 |
|
Effect of a Practice-Based Strategy on Test Ordering Performance of Primary Care Physicians
A Randomized Trial
Wim H. J. M. Verstappen, MD;
Trudy van der Weijden, MD, PhD;
Jildou Sijbrandij, MSc;
Ivo Smeele, MD, PhD;
Jan Hermsen, MD;
Jeremy Grimshaw, PhD;
Richard P. T. M. Grol, PhD
JAMA. 2003;289:2407-2412.
Context Numbers of diagnostic tests ordered by primary care physicians are growing and many of these tests seem to be unnecessary according to established, evidence-based guidelines. An innovative strategy that focused on clinical problems and associated tests was developed.
Objective To determine the effects of a multifaceted strategy aimed at improving the performance of primary care physicians' test ordering.
Design Multicenter, randomized controlled trial with a balanced, incomplete block design and randomization at group level. Thirteen groups of primary care physicians underwent the strategy for 3 clinical problems (arm A; cardiovascular topics, upper and lower abdominal complaints), while 13 other groups underwent the strategy for 3 other clinical problems (arm B; chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and asthma, general complaints, degenerative joint complaints). Each arm acted as a control for the other.
Setting Primary care physician groups in 5 regions in the Netherlands with diagnostic centers recruited from May to September 1998.
Study Participants Twenty-six primary care physician groups, including 174 primary care physicians.
Intervention During the 6 months of intervention, physicians discussed 3 consecutive, personal feedback reports in 3 small group meetings, related them to 3 evidence-based clinical guidelines, and made plans for change.
Main Outcome Measure According to existing national, evidence-based guidelines, a decrease in the total numbers of tests ordered per clinical problem, and of some defined inappropriate tests, is considered a quality improvement.
Results For clinical problems allocated to arm A, the mean total number of requested tests per 6 months per physician was reduced from baseline to follow-up by 12% among physicians in the arm A intervention, but was unchanged in the arm B control, with a mean reduction of 67 more tests per physician per 6 months in arm A than in arm B (P = .01). For clinical problems allocated to arm B, the mean total number of requested tests per 6 months per physician was reduced from baseline to follow-up by 8% among physicians in the arm B intervention, and by 3% in the arm A control, with a mean reduction of 28 more tests per physician per 6 months in arm B than in arm A (P = .22). Physicians in arm A had a significant reduction in mean total number of inappropriate tests ordered for problems allocated to arm A, whereas the reduction in inappropriate test ordered physicians in arm B for problems allocated to arm B was not statistically significant.
Conclusion In this study, a practice-based, multifaceted strategy using guidelines, feedback, and social interaction resulted in modest improvements in test ordering by primary care physicians.
Author Affiliations: Center for Quality of Care Research, Department of General Practice (Drs Verstappen, Weijden, and Grol), Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands; Medical Integration Center Kempenland, Maxima Medical Center, Veldhoven, the Netherlands (Dr Verstappen); Department of Methodology and Statistics, Maastricht University, (Ms Sijbrandij); Center for Diagnostics and Consultation, Elkerliek Hospital, Helmond, the Netherlands (Dr Smeele); Medical Diagnostic Center of the Canisius Wilhelmina Hospital Nijmegen (Dr Hermsen), Ottawa Health Research Institute, Center of Best Practice, Institute of Population Health, University of Ottawa, Canada (Dr Grimshaw).
 CiteULike  Connotea  Del.icio.us  Digg  Reddit  Technorati
What's this?
RELATED LETTER
Strategies to Improve Test Ordering in Primary Care
Arthur M. Bohnen
JAMA. 2003;290(17):2253.
EXTRACT
| FULL TEXT
THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES
|
Laboratory Medicine Quality Indicators: A Review of the Literature
Shahangian and Snyder
Am J Clin Pathol 2009;131:418-431.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
The unbearable lightness of diagnostic testing: time to contain inappropriate test ordering
Schattner
Postgrad. Med. J. 2008;84:618-621.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Evidence-based medicine as viewed by key decision-makers of health plans in southern Brazil
Tiburi
Health Serv Manage Res 2008;21:185-191.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Cost Consequences of Implementing an Electronic Decision Support System for Ordering Laboratory Tests in Primary Care: Evidence from a Controlled Prospective Study in The Netherlands
Poley et al.
Clin. Chem. 2007;53:213-219.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Pediatricians' Clinical Decision Making: Results of 2 Randomized Controlled Trials of Test Performance Characteristics
Sox et al.
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2006;160:487-492.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
The Logic Behind a Multimethod Intervention to Improve Adherence to Clinical Practice Guidelines in a Nationwide Network of Primary Care Practices
Feifer et al.
Eval Health Prof 2006;29:65-88.
ABSTRACT
Improving Test Ordering in Primary Care: The Added Value of a Small-Group Quality Improvement Strategy Compared With Classic Feedback Only
Verstappen et al.
Ann Fam Med 2004;2:569-575.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Comparing cost effects of two quality strategies to improve test ordering in primary care: a randomized trial
Verstappen et al.
Int J Qual Health Care 2004;16:391-398.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Pitfalls of and Controversies in Cluster Randomization Trials
Donner and Klar
Am. J. Public Health 2004;94:416-422.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Effect of a Controlled Feedback Intervention on Laboratory Test Ordering by Community Physicians
Bunting and van Walraven
Clin. Chem. 2004;50:321-326.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Strategies to Improve Test Ordering in Primary Care
Bohnen
JAMA 2003;290:2253-2253.
FULL TEXT
|
