 |
|
Contamination Rates of Blood Cultures Obtained by Dedicated Phlebotomy vs Intravenous Catheter
Alonna Norberg, MD;
Norman C. Christopher, MD;
Maria L. Ramundo, MD;
John R. Bower, MD;
Shirley A. Berman, RN
JAMA. 2003;289:726-729.
Context Blood culture is the criterion standard for identifying children with bacteremia. However, elevated false-positive rates are common and are associated with substantial health care costs.
Objective To compare contamination rates in blood culture specimens obtained from separate sites vs through newly inserted intravenous catheters.
Design, Setting, and Participants Observational study conducted January 1998 through December 1999 among patients aged 18 years or younger who were seen at a US children's hospital emergency department and had a blood culture obtained as part of their care. Medical records were reviewed in all cases with a positive blood culture. Patients with indwelling vascular catheters were excluded.
Intervention All phlebotomy was performed by emergency department registered nurses. During the baseline phase, blood specimens for culture were obtained simultaneously with intravenous catheter insertion. During the postintervention phase, specimens were obtained by a separate, dedicated procedure.
Main Outcome Measure Contamination rate in the postintervention period compared with the baseline period.
Results A total of 4108 blood cultures were evaluated, including 2108 during the baseline phase and 2000 in the postintervention phase. The false-positive blood culture rate decreased from 9.1% to 2.8% (P<.001). A statistical process control chart demonstrated a steady-state process in the baseline phase and the establishment of a significantly improved steady state in the postintervention phase. Young age was associated with increased contamination rate in both the baseline and postintervention periods.
Conclusion Blood culture contamination rates were lower when specimens were drawn from a separate site compared with when they were drawn through a newly inserted intravenous catheter.
Author Affiliations: Divisions of Emergency Medicine (Drs Norberg, Christopher, Ramundo, and Ms Berman) and Infectious Diseases (Dr Bower), Department of Pediatrics, Children's Hospital Medical Center of Akron, Akron, Ohio; and Departments of Emergency Medicine and Pediatrics, Northeastern Ohio Universities College of Medicine, Rootstown (Drs Norberg, Christopher, Ramundo, and Bower).
 CiteULike  Connotea  Del.icio.us  Digg  Reddit  Technorati  Twitter
What's this?
THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES
|
Effects of Volume and Site of Blood Draw on Blood Culture Results
Gonsalves et al.
J. Clin. Microbiol. 2009;47:3482-3485.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Discarding the Initial Aliquot of Blood Does Not Reduce Contamination Rates in Intravenous-Catheter-Drawn Blood Cultures
Dwivedi et al.
J. Clin. Microbiol. 2009;47:2950-2951.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Blood cultures: towards zero false positives
Thompson and Madeo
British Journal of Infection Control 2009;10:s24-s26.
ABSTRACT
Impact of Blood Cultures Drawn by Phlebotomy on Contamination Rates and Health Care Costs in a Hospital Emergency Department
Gander et al.
J. Clin. Microbiol. 2009;47:1021-1024.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Laboratory Medicine Quality Indicators: A Review of the Literature
Shahangian and Snyder
Am J Clin Pathol 2009;131:418-431.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Application of statistical process control in healthcare improvement: systematic review
Thor et al.
Qual Saf Health Care 2007;16:387-399.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Updated Review of Blood Culture Contamination
Hall and Lyman
Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2006;19:788-802.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Incidence and Predictors of Serious Bacterial Infections Among 57- to 180-Day-Old Infants
Hsiao et al.
Pediatrics 2006;117:1695-1701.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Drawing Blood Culture Specimens from Non-IV Sites Decreases Contamination in Children
JWatch Emergency Med. 2003;2003:9-9.
FULL TEXT
Preventing Contaminated Blood Cultures -- Don't Use Intravenous Catheters!
JWatch Infect. Diseases 2003;2003:6-6.
FULL TEXT
|
