You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 289 No. 6, February 12, 2003 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Special Communication
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on ISI (19)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Topic Collections
 •Drug Therapy, Other
 •Statistics and Research Methods
 •Academic Medical Centers
 •Conflict of Interest
 •Alert me on articles by topic

Restoring Balance to Industry-Academia Relationships in an Era of Institutional Financial Conflicts of Interest

Promoting Research While Maintaining Trust

Michael M. E. Johns, MD; Mark Barnes, JD, LLM; Patrik S. Florencio, LLB, BCL

JAMA. 2003;289:741-746.

Economic partnerships between industry and academia accelerate medical innovation and enhance patient access to medical advances, but such partnerships have sometimes eroded public trust in the research enterprise. There is particular risk for conflict of interest when economic partnerships extend beyond a university's corporate interests to involve institutional decision makers. Institutions and institutional decision makers should fully disclose industry-related financial interests and relationships. Without legitimate justification for such interests, individuals should divest themselves from these interests or recuse themselves from responsibility for research oversight. Management of institutional partnerships also might entail the physical separation of certain facilities, the placement of restrictions on information shared between investment and research staffs, and provision of oversight by independent review panels made up of persons who have expertise in intellectual property, finance, and research, but who are not financially or otherwise dependent on the institution. Through these means, it is possible to restore balance to industry-academia relationships, thereby promoting progress while maintaining public trust in research.


Author Affiliations: Robert W. Woodruff Health Sciences Center, Emory University, Atlanta, Ga (Dr Johns); Health Care Group, Ropes & Gray, New York, NY (Mssrs Barnes and Florencio).



THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Responses of Medical Schools to Institutional Conflicts of Interest
Ehringhaus et al.
JAMA 2008;299:665-671.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Origin and funding of the most frequently cited papers in medicine: database analysis
Patsopoulos et al.
BMJ 2006;332:1061-1064.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Regulating Academic-Industrial Research Relationships -- Solving Problems or Stifling Progress?
Stossel
NEJM 2005;353:1060-1065.
FULL TEXT  

Industry Funding of Clinical Trials: Benefit or Bias?
Chopra
JAMA 2003;290:113-114.
FULL TEXT  

Handling Conflicts of Interest Between Industry and Academia
Egilman and Ehrle
JAMA 2003;289:3240-3240.
FULL TEXT  

The "Price" of Information
Heinig
J Hum Lact 2003;19:133-135.
 

The power of clinical trials and guidelines,and the challenge of conflicts of interest
Bruce Fye
J Am Coll Cardiol 2003;41:1237-1242.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2003 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.