You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 289 No. 7, February 19, 2003 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  On Call: Issues in Graduate Medical Education
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on ISI (17)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related letter
 •Related article
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Topic Collections
 •Medical Education
 •Alert me on articles by topic

The Origins, History, and Design of the Resident Match

Alvin E. Roth, PhD

JAMA. 2003;289:909-912.

In the early 1900s, competition among hospitals for interns and among medical students for good internships led to increasingly early offers of internships to students. By the 1940s, appointments were often made as early as the beginning of the junior year of medical school. Hospitals thus had little information about students' performance, and students frequently had to make a final decision to accept or reject an offer without knowing which other offers might be forthcoming. From 1945 through 1951, efforts were made to enforce a uniform date for accepting offers. However, students were still faced with offers having very short deadlines, compelling them to accept or reject offers without knowing what other offers might be forthcoming. Hospitals often had to scramble for available students, since if an offer was rejected, it was often too late for them to reach their next preferred candidate. A centralized clearinghouse was thus developed as a way of alleviating this chaos and allowing a larger role to the preferences of both students and hospitals. This evolved into the current matching program, whose algorithm continues to be updated to take account of changing needs of applicants, such as growth in the number of couples who seek 2 positions in the same vicinity.


Author Affiliation: Department of Economics, Harvard University, Cambridge, Mass.


RELATED LETTER

Effect of a Match on Salaries for Medical Fellows—Reply
Muriel Niederle and Alvin E. Roth
JAMA. 2003;290(18):2408.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

RELATED ARTICLE

The National Resident Matching Program and Antitrust Law
Frances H. Miller and Thomas L. Greaney
JAMA. 2003;289(7):913-918.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

AOA Symposium. Current State of Fellowship Hiring: Is a Universal Match Necessary? Is It Possible?
Harner et al.
JBJS 2008;90:1375-1384.
FULL TEXT  

Graduate Medical Education Research in the 21st Century and JAMA On Call
Lim and Golub
JAMA 2004;292:2913-2915.
FULL TEXT  

Assessment of the Neuroradiology Fellowship Match: Year 3
Yousem and Hammoud
Am. J. Neuroradiol. 2004;25:897-900.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Effect of a Match on Salaries for Medical Fellows--Reply
Niederle and Roth
JAMA 2003;290:2408-2408.
FULL TEXT  

Economic Issues in the Residency Match
Lumer
JAMA 2003;289:2502-2502.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2003 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.