You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 290 No. 10, September 10, 2003 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Original Contribution
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on ISI (18)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related letter
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Topic Collections
 •Randomized Controlled Trial
 •Alert me on articles by topic

Effect of Awareness of a Randomized Controlled Trial on Use of Experimental Therapy

William F. Clark, MD, FRCPC; Amit X. Garg, MD, FRCPC; Peter G. Blake, MB, FRCPC; Gail A. Rock, PhD, MD; A. Paul Heidenheim, MA; David L. Sackett, MD, FRCPC

JAMA. 2003;290:1351-1355.

Context  Use of experimental therapies during but outside of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) has not been studied.

Objective  To determine whether initiation of an RCT leads to increased use of the experimental therapy outside the trial.

Design and Setting  Data on national apheresis use during 3 Canadian RCTs for multiple sclerosis (1986-1988), thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (1982-1988), and myeloma cast nephropathy (1998-2000) were obtained from 19 major medical centers in Canada. The multiple sclerosis and myeloma cast nephropathy trials had data on apheresis use for 3 years prior to and during the trials, which permitted a time-series analysis to determine the impact of the RCTs on the use of apheresis. The ongoing myeloma cast nephropathy trial provided data on the number of patients inside and outside of the RCTs in trial and nontrial centers. Initial and follow-up questionnaires were sent to 24 Canadian physicians in trial and nontrial centers to determine if they had noted an increase in apheresis activity during the trials and, if so, their explanation for it.

Main Outcome Measure  Change in number of patients undergoing apheresis for thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura, multiple sclerosis, and myeloma cast nephropathy prior to and during the respective RCTs compared with all patients undergoing apheresis during the same periods.

Results  During all 3 RCTs, there were large increases in use of apheresis. The majority of the increased use of apheresis was outside of the trials: for multiple sclerosis, 30 of 49 patients per year (61% of increase); thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura, 49 of 56 patients per year (72% of increase); and myeloma cast nephropathy, 60 of 72 patients per year (57% of increase). The myeloma cast nephropathy study noted that this increase occurred in both nontrial and trial centers. Among questionnaire respondents (n = 22; 92% response rate), most physicians noted an increase in apheresis activity during the trials and attributed it to a "jumping-the-gun" phenomenon.

Conclusions  During 3 Canadian RCTs, apheresis increased, but most of the increase occurred outside the trials. This behavior during an RCT, in the absence of clear efficacy, can be termed jumping the gun.


Author Affiliations: Division of Nephrology, London Health Sciences Centre, University of Western Ontario, London (Drs Clark, Garg, and Blake and Mr Heidenheim); and the Canadian Apheresis Group (Drs Clark and Rock) and Trout Research and Education Centre of Irish Lake (Dr Sackett), Markdale, Ontario.


RELATED LETTER

Premature Application of Trial Results to Clinical Practice
and
JAMA. ;290():3072-3072.
FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

A well-conducted randomized trial that establishes no benefit of therapy is an important medical advance
Garg et al.
Nephrol Dial Transplant 2008;23:52-55.
FULL TEXT  

Evaluation and Management of Patients With Thrombotic Thrombocytopenic Purpura
George
J Intensive Care Med 2007;22:82-91.
ABSTRACT  

Assessment of Patients' and Physicians' Compliance to an ACE Inhibitor Treatment Based on Urinary N-Acetyl Ser-Asp-Lys-Pro Determination in the Noninsulin-Dependent Diabetes, Hypertension, Microalbuminuria, Proteinuria, Cardiovascular Events, and Ramipril (DIABHYCAR) Study.
Azizi et al.
Diabetes Care 2006;29:1331-1336.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Clinical practice. Thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura.
George
NEJM 2006;354:1927-1935.
FULL TEXT  

Plasma Exchange When Myeloma Presents as Acute Renal Failure: A Randomized, Controlled Trial
Clark et al.
ANN INTERN MED 2005;143:777-784.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Reversal of oliguric tacrolimus nephrotoxicity in children
McLaughlin and Abitbol
Nephrol Dial Transplant 2005;20:1471-1475.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The Incidence of TTP-HUS: Racial Disparity among Patients with Severe ADAMTS13 Deficiency.
Williams et al.
ASH ANNUAL MEETING ABSTRACTS 2004;104:857-857.
ABSTRACT  

Premature Application of Trial Results to Clinical Practice
Boutron and Ravaud
JAMA 2003;290:3072-3072.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2003 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.