You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 290 No. 13, October 1, 2003 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Preliminary Communication
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on ISI (79)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Topic Collections
 •Randomized Controlled Trial
 •Pain
 •Alert me on articles by topic

Analgesic Effect of the Synthetic Cannabinoid CT-3 on Chronic Neuropathic Pain

A Randomized Controlled Trial

Matthias Karst, MD, PhD; Kahlid Salim, MS; Sumner Burstein, PhD; Ingomar Conrad, MD; Ludwig Hoy, PhD; Udo Schneider, MD, PhD

JAMA. 2003;290:1757-1762.

Context  1',1'Dimethylheptyl-{Delta}8-tetrahydrocannabinol-11-oic acid (CT-3), a potent analog of THC-11-oic acid, produces marked antiallodynic and analgesic effects in animals without evoking the typical effects described in models of cannabinoids. Therefore, CT-3 may be an effective analgesic for poorly controlled resistant neuropathic pain.

Objective  To examine the analgesic efficacy and safety of CT-3 in chronic neuropathic pain in humans.

Design and Setting  Randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind crossover trial conducted in Germany from May-September 2002.

Participants  Twenty-one patients (8 women and 13 men) aged 29 to 65 years (mean, 51 years) who had a clinical presentation and examination consistent with chronic neuropathic pain (for at least 6 months) with hyperalgesia (n = 21) and allodynia (n = 7).

Interventions  Patients were randomized to two 7-day treatment orders in a crossover design. Two daily doses of CT-3 (four 10-mg capsules per day) or identical placebo capsules were given during the first 4 days and 8 capsules per day were given in 2 daily doses in the following 3 days. After a washout and baseline period of 1 week each, patients crossed over to the second 7-day treatment period.

Main Outcome Measures  Visual analog scale (VAS) and verbal rating scale scores for pain; vital sign, hematologic and blood chemistry, and electrocardiogram measurements; scores on the Trail-Making Test and the Addiction Research Center Inventory–Marijuana scale; and adverse effects.

Results  The mean differences over time for the VAS values in the CT-3–placebo sequence measured 3 hours after intake of study drug differed significantly from those in the placebo–CT-3 sequence (mean [SD], -11.54 [14.16] vs 9.86 [21.43]; P = .02). Eight hours after intake of the drug, the pain scale differences between groups were less marked. No dose response was observed. Adverse effects, mainly transient dry mouth and tiredness, were reported significantly more often during CT-3 treatment (mean [SD] difference, -0.67 [0.50] for CT-3–placebo sequence vs 0.10 [0.74] for placebo–CT-3 sequence; P = .02). There were no significant differences with respect to vital signs, blood tests, electrocardiogram, Trail-Making Test, and Addiction Research Center Inventory–Marijuana scale. No carryover or period effects were observed except on the Trail-Making Test.

Conclusions  In this preliminary study, CT-3 was effective in reducing chronic neuropathic pain compared with placebo. No major adverse effects were observed.


Author Affiliations: Department of Anesthesiology, Pain Clinic (Drs Karst and Conrad and Mr Salim), Department of Biometrics (Dr Hoy), and Department of Clinical Psychiatry and Psychotherapy (Dr Schneider), Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany; and Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Pharmacology, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester (Dr Burstein).



THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Neuropathic pain: emerging treatments
Dray
Br J Anaesth 2008;101:48-58.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Therapeutic potential of cannabis in pain medicine
Hosking and Zajicek
Br J Anaesth 2008;101:59-68.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Multiple Sclerosis, Cannabinoids, and Cognition
Papathanasopoulos et al.
J. Neuropsychiatry Clin. Neurosi. 2008;20:36-51.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Comments on "Cannabimimetic Properties of Ajulemic Acid"
Karst
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 2007;322:420-421.
FULL TEXT  

Ajulemic Acid, a Synthetic Nonpsychoactive Cannabinoid Acid, Bound to the Ligand Binding Domain of the Human Peroxisome Proliferator-activated Receptor {gamma}
Ambrosio et al.
J. Biol. Chem. 2007;282:18625-18633.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Cannabimimetic Properties of Ajulemic Acid
Vann et al.
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 2007;320:678-686.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Cannabis use in patients with multiple sclerosis
Chong et al.
Mult Scler 2006;12:646-651.
ABSTRACT  

The Endocannabinoid System as an Emerging Target of Pharmacotherapy
Pacher et al.
Pharmacol. Rev. 2006;58:389-462.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Modulation of Neuropathic and Inflammatory Pain by the Endocannabinoid Transport Inhibitor AM404 [N-(4-Hydroxyphenyl)-eicosa-5,8,11,14-tetraenamide]
La Rana et al.
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 2006;317:1365-1371.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Cannabinoid Analgesia as a Potential New Therapeutic Option in the Treatment of Chronic Pain
Burns and Ineck
The Annals of Pharmacotherapy 2006;40:251-260.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Randomized, controlled trial of cannabis-based medicine in central pain in multiple sclerosis
Rog et al.
Neurology 2005;65:812-819.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Does the cannabinoid dronabinol reduce central pain in multiple sclerosis? Randomised double blind placebo controlled crossover trial
Svendsen et al.
BMJ 2004;329:253.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2003 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.