You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 290 No. 14, October 8, 2003 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Original Contribution
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on ISI (100)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related letters
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Topic Collections
 •Patient Safety/ Medical Error
 •Infectious Diseases, Other
 •Alert me on articles by topic

Safety of Patients Isolated for Infection Control

Henry Thomas Stelfox, MD; David W. Bates, MD, MSc; Donald A. Redelmeier, MD, MSc

JAMA. 2003;290:1899-1905.

Context  Hospital infection control policies that use patient isolation prevent nosocomial transmission of infectious diseases, but may inadvertently lead to patient neglect and errors.

Objective  To examine the quality of medical care received by patients isolated for infection control.

Design, Setting, and Patients  We identified consecutive adults who were isolated for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus colonization or infection at 2 large North American teaching hospitals: a general cohort (patients admitted with all diagnoses between January 1, 1999, and January 1, 2000; n = 78); and a disease-specific cohort (patients admitted with a diagnosis of congestive heart failure between January 1, 1999, and July 1, 2002; n = 72). Two matched controls were selected for each isolated patient (n = 156 general cohort controls and n = 144 disease-specific cohort controls).

Main Outcome Measures  Quality-of-care measures encompassing processes, outcomes, and satisfaction. Adjustments for study cohort and patient demographic, hospital, and clinical characteristics were conducted using multivariable regression.

Results  Isolated and control patients generally had similar baseline characteristics; however, isolated patients were twice as likely as control patients to experience adverse events during their hospitalization (31 vs 15 adverse events per 1000 days; P<.001). This difference in adverse events reflected preventable events (20 vs 3 adverse events per 1000 days; P<.001) as opposed to nonpreventable events (11 vs 12 adverse events per 1000 days; P = .98). Isolated patients were also more likely to formally complain to the hospital about their care than control patients (8% vs 1%; P<.001), to have their vital signs not recorded as ordered (51% vs 31%; P<.001), and more likely to have days with no physician progress note (26% vs 13%; P<.001). No differences in hospital mortality were observed for the 2 groups (17% vs 10%; P = .16).

Conclusion  Compared with controls, patients isolated for infection control precautions experience more preventable adverse events, express greater dissatisfaction with their treatment, and have less documented care.


Author Affiliations: Department of Medicine (Drs Stelfox and Redelmeier) and Department of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation (Dr Redelmeier), University of Toronto, and Clinical Epidemiology Unit, Sunnybrook and Women's College Health Sciences Centre (Dr Redelmeier), Toronto, Ontario; Graduate School of Arts and Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge, Mass (Dr Stelfox); and Division of General Medicine and Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School (Drs Stelfox and Bates), and Partners HealthCare Systems (Dr Bates), Boston, Mass.


RELATED LETTERS

Quality of Care and Satisfaction Among Patients Isolated for Infection Control
Jean-Jacques Parienti
JAMA. 2004;291(4):420.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Quality of Care and Satisfaction Among Patients Isolated for Infection Control
Nasia Safdar and Dennis G. Maki
JAMA. 2004;291(4):420-421.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Quality of Care and Satisfaction Among Patients Isolated for Infection Control
Stephen G. Weber, Trish M. Perl, and Sara E. Cosgrove
JAMA. 2004;291(4):421.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Quality of Care and Satisfaction Among Patients Isolated for Infection Control—Reply
Henry Thomas Stelfox, David W. Bates, and Donald A. Redelmeier
JAMA. 2004;291(4):421-422.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Single-Patient Rooms for Safe Patient-Centered Hospitals
Detsky and Etchells
JAMA 2008;300:954-956.
FULL TEXT  

Care of Children Isolated for Infection Control: A Prospective Observational Cohort Study
Cohen et al.
Pediatrics 2008;122:e411-e415.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Rapid Identification of Hospitalized Patients at High Risk for MRSA Carriage
Evans et al.
J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 2008;15:506-512.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Benefits and Drawbacks of Universal Surveillance of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus
Diekema
ANN INTERN MED 2008;149:67-67.
FULL TEXT  

Benefits and Drawbacks of Universal Surveillance of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus
Peterson et al.
ANN INTERN MED 2008;149:68-69.
FULL TEXT  

Ethical Implications of Active Surveillance Cultures and Contact Precautions for Controlling Multidrug Resistant Organisms in the Hospital Setting
Edmond et al.
Public Health Ethics 2008;0:phn014v1-phn014.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Preventing MRSA Infections: Finding It Is Not Enough
Diekema and Climo
JAMA 2008;299:1190-1192.
FULL TEXT  

Use of a Regional Health Information Exchange to Detect Crossover of Patients with MRSA between Urban Hospitals
Kho et al.
J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 2008;15:212-216.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The Tension between Needing to Improve Care and Knowing How to Do It
Auerbach et al.
NEJM 2007;357:608-613.
FULL TEXT  

Differences in HIV Care Between Patients With and Without Severe Mental Illness
Fremont et al.
Psychiatr. Serv. 2007;58:681-688.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Microbial Colonization of the Hands of Residents
Baker and Katz
CLIN PEDIATR 2006;45:341-345.
ABSTRACT  

Controlling methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: Quantifying the effects of interventions and rapid diagnostic testing
Bootsma et al.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2006;103:5620-5625.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Let MRSA-positive patients live a normal life
Geffers and Ruden
Nephrol Dial Transplant 2006;21:835-836.
FULL TEXT  

Advantages and Disadvantages of Single-Versus Multiple-Occupancy Rooms in Acute Care Environments: A Review and Analysis of the Literature
Chaudhury et al.
Environment and Behavior 2005;37:760-786.
ABSTRACT  

Enhanced Notification of Critical Ventilator Events
Evans et al.
J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 2005;12:589-595.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Number of Negative Acid-Fast Smears Needed To Adequately Assess Infectivity of Patients With Pulmonary Tuberculosis
Mixides et al.
Chest 2005;128:108-115.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Does isolation prevent the spread of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus?
Dhaliwal and McGeer
CMAJ 2005;172:875-875.
FULL TEXT  

Medical Errors
Holder
ASH Education Book 2005;2005:503-506.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Rapid Detection of Antimicrobial-Resistant Organism Carriage: an Unmet Clinical Need
Diekema et al.
J. Clin. Microbiol. 2004;42:2879-2883.
FULL TEXT  

Quality of Care and Satisfaction Among Patients Isolated for Infection Control
Parienti
JAMA 2004;291:420-420.
FULL TEXT  

Quality of Care and Satisfaction Among Patients Isolated for Infection Control
Weber et al.
JAMA 2004;291:421-421.
FULL TEXT  

Quality of Care and Satisfaction Among Patients Isolated for Infection Control
Safdar and Maki
JAMA 2004;291:420-421.
FULL TEXT  

Isolation Practices Decrease Patients' Safety
JWatch Infect. Diseases 2003;2003:4-4.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2003 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.