 |
|
Regionalization of High-Risk Surgery and Implications for Patient Travel Times
John D. Birkmeyer, MD;
Andrea E. Siewers, MPH;
Nancy J. Marth, MS;
David C. Goodman, MD, MS
JAMA. 2003;290:2703-2708.
Context Given the strong volume-outcome relationships observed with many surgical procedures, restricting some procedures to hospitals exceeding a minimum volume standard is advocated. However, such regionalization policies might cause unreasonable travel burdens for surgical patients.
Objective To estimate how minimum volume standards for esophagectomy and pancreatic resection would affect how long patients must travel for these procedures.
Design, Setting, and Patients Simulated trial based on Medicare claims and US road network data. All US hospitals in the 48 continental states were in the study if their surgical procedures included esophagectomy and pancreatic resection. Data from Medicare patients (N = 15 796) undergoing these 2 procedures for cancer between 1994 and 1999 were used.
Main Outcome Measure Additional travel time for patients required to change to higher-volume centers as a result of alternative hospital volume standards (procedures per year).
Results With low-volume standards (1/year for pancreatectomy; 2/year for esophagectomy), approximately 15% of patients would change to higher-volume centers, with negligible effect on their travel times. Most patients would need to travel less than 30 additional minutes (74% pancreatectomy; 76% esophagectomy). Many patients already lived closer to a higher-volume hospital (25% pancreatectomy; 26% esophagectomy). Conversely, with very high-volume standards (>16/year for pancreatectomy; >19/year for esophagectomy), approximately 80% of patients would change to higher-volume centers. More than 50% of these patients would increase their travel time by more than 60 minutes. Travel times would increase most for patients living in rural areas.
Conclusions Many patients travel past a higher-volume center to undergo surgery at a low-volume hospital. If not set too high, hospital volume standards could be implemented for selected operations without imposing unreasonable travel burdens on patients.
Author Affiliations: Departments of Surgery (Dr Birkmeyer) and Pediatrics (Dr Goodman), Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH; Center for the Evaluative Clinical Sciences, Dartmouth Medical School, Hanover, NH (Drs Birkmeyer and Goodman and Ms Marth); and Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Maine Medical Center, Portland (Ms Siewers).
THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES
|
Directing Surgical Quality Improvement Initiatives: Comparison of Perioperative Mortality and Long-Term Survival for Cancer Surgery
Bilimoria et al.
JCO 2008;26:4626-4633.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Measuring and Improving the Quality of Care for Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Surgery
Dimick and Upchurch
Circulation 2008;117:2534-2541.
FULL TEXT
Reducing Avoidable Deaths Among Veterans: Directing Private-Sector Surgical Care to High-Performance Hospitals
Weeks et al.
Am. J. Public Health 2007;97:2186-2192.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Application of a Similarity Index to State Discharge Abstract Data to Identify Opportunities for Growth of Surgical and Anesthesia Practices
Wachtel et al.
Anesth. Analg. 2007;104:1157-1170.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Impact of Surgeon and Hospital Caseload on the Likelihood of Performing Laparoscopic vs Open Sigmoid Resection for Diverticular Disease: A Study Based on 55 949 Patients
Weber et al.
Arch Surg 2007;142:253-259.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Volume-Based Referral for Cancer Surgery: Informing the Debate
Hollenbeck et al.
JCO 2007;25:91-96.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Hospital Volumes for Common Pediatric Specialty Operations
Berry et al.
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2007;161:38-43.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Distance From Home When Death Occurs: A Population-Based Study of Washington State, 1989-2002
Feudtner et al.
Pediatrics 2006;117:e932-e939.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Driving Times and Distances to Hospitals With Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in the United States: Implications for Prehospital Triage of Patients With ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction
Nallamothu et al.
Circulation 2006;113:1189-1195.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
The Case for Community Hospital Angioplasty
Wharton et al.
Circulation 2005;112:3509-3534.
FULL TEXT
Clinical Predictions and Decisions to Perform Cardiac Surgery on High-Risk Patients
Dupuis
SEMIN CARDIOTHORAC VASC ANESTH 2005;9:179-186.
ABSTRACT
Cardiac Revascularization in Specialty and General Hospitals
Cram et al.
NEJM 2005;352:1454-1462.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Regionalization of Percutaneous Transluminal Coronary Angioplasty and Implications for Patient Travel Distance
Kansagra et al.
JAMA 2004;292:1717-1723.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
|
