You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 290 No. 6, August 13, 2003 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Special Communication
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related letters
 •Related article
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Topic Collections
 •Caring for the Uninsured and Underinsured
 •Health Policy
 •Alert me on articles by topic

Proposal of the Physicians' Working Group for Single-Payer National Health Insurance

The Physicians' Working Group for Single-Payer National Health Insurance*

JAMA. 2003;290:798-805.

The United States spends more than twice as much on health care as the average of other developed nations, all of which boast universal coverage. Yet more than 41 million Americans have no health insurance. Many more are underinsured. Confronted by the rising costs and capabilities of modern medicine, other nations have chosen national health insurance (NHI). The United States alone treats health care as a commodity distributed according to the ability to pay, rather than as a social service to be distributed according to medical need. In this market-driven system, insurers and providers compete not so much by increasing quality or lowering costs, but by avoiding unprofitable patients and shifting costs back to patients or to other payers. This creates the paradox of a health care system based on avoiding the sick. It generates huge administrative costs that, along with profits, divert resources from clinical care to the demands of business. In addition, burgeoning satellite businesses, such as consulting firms and marketing companies, consume an increasing fraction of the health care dollar. We endorse a fundamental change in US health care—the creation of an NHI program. Such a program, which in essence would be an expanded and improved version of traditional Medicare, would cover every American for all necessary medical care. An NHI program would save at least $200 billion annually (more than enough to cover all of the uninsured) by eliminating the high overhead and profits of the private, investor-owned insurance industry and reducing spending for marketing and other satellite services. Physicians and hospitals would be freed from the concomitant burdens and expenses of paperwork created by having to deal with multiple insurers with different rules, often designed to avoid payment. National health insurance would make it possible to set and enforce overall spending limits for the health care system, slowing cost growth over the long run. An NHI program is the only affordable option for universal, comprehensive coverage.


*Authors: The writing committee for the Physicians' Working Group for Single-Payer National Health Insurance included Steffie Woolhandler, MD, MPH (Department of Medicine, Cambridge Hospital/Harvard Medical School, Cambridge, Mass), David U. Himmelstein, MD (Department of Medicine, Cambridge Hospital/Harvard Medical School, Cambridge, Mass), Marcia Angell, MD (Department of Social Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass), and Quentin D. Young, MD (Physicians for a National Health Program, Chicago, Ill).


RELATED LETTERS

Proposals for US National Health Insurance
Donald J. Palmisano
JAMA. 2003;290(21):2797.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Proposals for US National Health Insurance
Michael Patmas
JAMA. 2003;290(21):2797-2798.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Proposals for US National Health Insurance
J. Timothy Ames
JAMA. 2003;290(21):2798.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Proposals for US National Health Insurance
Constantine L. Hampers
JAMA. 2003;290(21):2798.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Proposals for US National Health Insurance
Indira Jevaji
JAMA. 2003;290(21):2798.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Proposals for US National Health Insurance
Vic Velanovich
JAMA. 2003;290(21):2798-2799.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Proposals for US National Health Insurance
Elizabeth A. Bayliss
JAMA. 2003;290(21):2799.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

RELATED ARTICLE

Universal Health Insurance—Let the Debate Resume
Rashi Fein
JAMA. 2003;290(6):818-820.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Is Spending More Always Wasteful? The Appropriateness Of Care And Outcomes Among Colorectal Cancer Patients
Landrum et al.
Health Aff (Millwood) 2008;27:159-168.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Our Health Care System at the Crossroads: Single Payer or Market Reform?
Himmelstein et al.
Ann. Thorac. Surg. 2007;84:1435-1446.
FULL TEXT  

Two-Tiered Health Care: A Problematic Double Standard
Brett
Arch Intern Med 2007;167:430-432.
FULL TEXT  

Access and Ability to Pay: The Ethics of a Tiered Health Care System
Krohmal and Emanuel
Arch Intern Med 2007;167:433-437.
FULL TEXT  

Health Systems in Transition: Canada
Hussey
JAMA 2007;297:647-648.
FULL TEXT  

Twelve-Year Trends In Health Insurance Coverage Among Latinos, By Subgroup And Immigration Status
Shah and Carrasquillo
Health Aff (Millwood) 2006;25:1612-1619.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

How Nonprofits Matter In American Medicine, And What To Do About It
Schlesinger and Gray
Health Aff (Millwood) 2006;25:W287-W303.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Theme Issue on Access to Health Care: Call for Papers.
Rennie and Fontanarosa
JAMA 2006;295:2182-2183.
FULL TEXT  

Health Care Reform: Why? What? When?
Fuchs and Emanuel
Health Aff (Millwood) 2005;24:1399-1414.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Public Expectations Of Nonprofit And For-Profit Ownership In American Medicine: Clarifications And Implications
Schlesinger et al.
Health Aff (Millwood) 2004;23:181-191.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Insuring the Uninsured: Will the 2004 Election Provide an Answer?
Bodenheimer
ANN INTERN MED 2004;141:556-561.
FULL TEXT  

Keeping Health Insurance Tax Credits on the Table
Pauly
JAMA 2004;291:2255-2256.
FULL TEXT  

Is a Paradigm Shift in US Healthcare Reimbursement Inevitable?
Weintraub and Shine
Circulation 2004;109:1448-1455.
FULL TEXT  

Physician-Citizens--Public Roles and Professional Obligations
Gruen et al.
JAMA 2004;291:94-98.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Costs of Health Care Administration in the United States and Canada
Sekhon et al.
NEJM 2003;349:2461-2464.
FULL TEXT  

Proposals for US National Health Insurance
Palmisano
JAMA 2003;290:2797-2797.
FULL TEXT  

Proposals for US National Health Insurance
Ames
JAMA 2003;290:2798-2798.
FULL TEXT  

Proposals for US National Health Insurance
Bayliss
JAMA 2003;290:2799-2799.
FULL TEXT  

Proposals for US National Health Insurance
Patmas
JAMA 2003;290:2797-2798.
FULL TEXT  

Proposals for US National Health Insurance
Hampers
JAMA 2003;290:2798-2798.
FULL TEXT  

Proposals for US National Health Insurance
Jevaji
JAMA 2003;290:2798-2798.
FULL TEXT  

Proposals for US National Health Insurance
Velanovich
JAMA 2003;290:2798-2799.
FULL TEXT  

Universal Health Insurance--Let the Debate Resume
Fein
JAMA 2003;290:818-820.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2003 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.