 |
|
Methodological Differences in Clinical Trials Evaluating Nonpharmacological and Pharmacological Treatments of Hip and Knee Osteoarthritis
Isabelle Boutron, MD;
Florence Tubach, MD;
Bruno Giraudeau, PhD;
Philippe Ravaud, MD, PhD
JAMA. 2003;290:1062-1070.
Context Randomized controlled trials have been developed essentially in the context of pharmacological treatments (ie, oral drugs; intra-articular injection; and topical, intramuscular, and intravenous treatments), but assessment of the effectiveness of nonpharmacological treatments (ie, surgery, arthroscopy, joint lavage, rehabilitation, acupuncture, and education) presents specific issues.
Objectives To compare the quality of articles of nonpharmacological and pharmacological treatments of hip and knee osteoarthritis and to identify specific methodological issues related to assessment of nonpharmacological treatments.
Design and Setting We searched MEDLINE and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials for articles of randomized controlled trials published between January 1, 1992, and February 28, 2002, in 28 general medical and specialty journals with high impact factors and assessing nonpharmacological and pharmacological treatments in patients with hip or knee osteoarthritis.
Main Outcome Measures The quality of the methods reported in the selected articles was assessed by 2 independent reviewers using the Jadad scale, the Delphi list, and guidelines found in the Users' Guides to the Medical Literature. Investigators also used a checklist of items developed by the authors to analyze study characteristics.
Results A total of 110 articles were included in the analysis; 50 (45.5%) assessed nonpharmacological treatments and 60 (54.5%) assessed pharmacological treatments. Reports of nonpharmacological treatments had a lower global quality score than did reports of pharmacological treatments as measured by the Jadad scale (mean [SD] score, 1.4 [1.3] vs 3.0 [1.3]) and the Delphi list (mean [SD] score, 5.2 [1.5] vs 7.5 [1.1]). Lack of reporting adequate random sequence generation and intention-to-treat analyses were found in both nonpharmacological and pharmacological articles. Nonpharmacological treatments were less often compared with a placebo than were pharmacological treatments (28.0% of articles vs 71.7%). Compared with pharmacological articles, nonpharmacological articles less often described blinding of patients (26.0% vs 96.7%), care providers (6.0% vs 81.7%), and outcome assessors (68.0% vs 98.3%). Care providers' skill levels could influence treatment effect in 84.0% of nonpharmacological articles vs 23.3% of pharmacological articles.
Conclusions In this analysis of reports of hip and knee osteoarthritis therapy, nonpharmacological articles scored lower than pharmacological articles in terms of quality. Assessments of nonpharmacological treatments must take into consideration additional methodological issues.
Author Affiliations: Département d'Epidémiologie, Biostatistique et Recherche Clinique, Groupe Hospitalier Bichat–Claude Bernard (Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris), Faculté Xavier Bichat, Université Paris VII (Drs Boutron, Tubach, and Ravaud), and INSERM EMI 0357 (Drs Boutron, Tubach, and Ravaud), Paris, France; and INSERM CIC 202, Tours, France (Dr Giraudeau).
THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES
|
Extending the CONSORT Statement to Randomized Trials of Nonpharmacologic Treatment: Explanation and Elaboration
Boutron et al.
ANN INTERN MED 2008;148:295-309.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Methods and Processes of the CONSORT Group: Example of an Extension for Trials Assessing Nonpharmacologic Treatments
Boutron et al.
ANN INTERN MED 2008;148:W-60-W-66.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Scales to Assess the Quality of Randomized Controlled Trials: A Systematic Review
Olivo et al.
ptjournal 2008;88:156-175.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Acupuncture: What Underlies Needle Administration?
Liu
Evid Based Complement Alternat Med 2008;0:nen002v1-nen002.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Effectiveness of Nonpharmacological and Nonsurgical Interventions for Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis: An Overview of Systematic Reviews
Christie et al.
ptjournal 2007;87:1697-1715.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Effectiveness of Nonpharmacological and Nonsurgical Interventions for Hip Osteoarthritis: An Umbrella Review of High-Quality Systematic Reviews
Moe et al.
ptjournal 2007;87:1716-1727.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
The Quality of Reporting of Orthopaedic Randomized Trials with Use of a Checklist for Nonpharmacological Therapies
Chan and Bhandari
JBJS 2007;89:1970-1978.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Non-drug care for RA is the era of evidence-based practice approaching?
Vliet Vlieland
Rheumatology (Oxford) 2007;46:1397-1404.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
The design and assessment of prospective randomised, controlled trials in orthopaedic surgery
Boutron et al.
J Bone Joint Surg Br 2007;89-B:858-863.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Perceptions and Competence in Evidence-Based Medicine: Are Surgeons Getting Better? A Questionnaire Survey of Members of the Dutch Orthopaedic Association
Poolman et al.
JBJS 2007;89:206-215.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Lunate Chondromalacia: Evaluation of Routine MRI Sequences
Bordalo-Rodrigues et al.
Am. J. Roentgenol. 2005;184:1464-1469.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Inappropriateness of randomised trials for complex phenomena: Single trial is never enough evidence to base decisions on
Boutron et al.
BMJ 2005;330:94-94.
FULL TEXT
|
