 |
|
Patient-Controlled Transdermal Fentanyl Hydrochloride vs Intravenous Morphine Pump for Postoperative Pain
A Randomized Controlled Trial
Eugene R. Viscusi, MD;
Lowell Reynolds, MD;
Frances Chung, MD;
Linda E. Atkinson, PhD;
Sarita Khanna, PhD
JAMA. 2004;291:1333-1341.
Context Patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) with morphine is commonly used to provide acute postoperative pain control after major surgery. The fentanyl hydrochloride patient-controlled transdermal system eliminates the need for venous access and complicated programming of pumps.
Objective To assess the efficacy and safety of an investigational patient-controlled iontophoretic transdermal system using fentanyl hydrochloride compared with a standard intravenous morphine patient-controlled pump.
Design, Setting, and Patients Prospective randomized controlled parallel-group trial conducted between September 2000 and March 2001 at 33 North American hospitals, enrolling 636 adult patients who had just undergone major surgery.
Interventions In surgical recovery rooms, patients were randomly assigned to intravenous morphine (1-mg bolus every 5 minutes; maximum of 10 mg/h) by a patient-controlled analgesia pump (n = 320) or iontophoretic fentanyl hydrochloride (40-µg infusion over 10 minutes) by a patient-controlled transdermal system (n = 316). Supplemental analgesia (morphine or fentanyl intravenous boluses) was administered as needed before and for the first 3 hours after activation of the PCA treatments. Patients then used the PCA treatments without additional analgesics for up to 72 hours.
Main Outcome Measures The primary efficacy variable was patient global assessment of the method of pain control during the first 24 hours. Additional efficacy measures were the proportion of patients discontinuing the study because of inadequate analgesia for any reason, patient-reported pain intensity scores on a 100-mm visual analog scale (VAS), and patient global assessments at 48 and 72 hours. Adverse effects were also recorded.
Results Ratings of good or excellent after 24 hours of treatment for the method of pain control were given by 73.7% of patients (233/316) who used transdermal fentanyl PCA and 76.9% of patients (246/320) who used intravenous morphine PCA; treatment difference was –3.2% (95% confidence interval, –9.9% to 3.5%; P = .36). Early patient discontinuations (25.9% fentanyl vs 25.0% morphine; P = .78) and last pain intensity scores (32.7 fentanyl vs 31.1 morphine on the VAS; P = .45) were not different between the 2 treatments. With continued treatment for up to 48 or 72 hours, more than 80% of patient assessments in each treatment group were good or excellent. The incidence of opioid-related adverse events was similar between the groups.
Conclusion An investigational PCA transdermal system using iontophoresis to deliver fentanyl provided postsurgical pain control equivalent to that of a standard intravenous morphine regimen delivered by a PCA pump.
Author Affiliations: Department of Anesthesiology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pa (Dr Viscusi); Loma Linda University–Center for Pain Management, Loma Linda, Calif (Dr Reynolds); Department of Anesthesiology, University of Toronto, Toronto Western Hospital, Ontario (Dr Chung); Statistics and Data Management (Dr Khanna) and Clinical Development (Dr Atkinson), ALZA Corporation, Mountain View, Calif.
 CiteULike  Connotea  Del.icio.us  Digg  Reddit  Technorati  Twitter
What's this?
THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES
|
The Safety and Efficacy of Fentanyl Iontophoretic Transdermal System Compared with Morphine Intravenous Patient-Controlled Analgesia for Postoperative Pain Management: An Analysis of Pooled Data from Three Randomized, Active-Controlled Clinical Studies
Viscusi et al.
Anesth. Analg. 2007;105:1428-1436.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
System-Related Events and Analgesic Gaps During Postoperative Pain Management with the Fentanyl Iontophoretic Transdermal System and Morphine Intravenous Patient-Controlled Analgesia
Panchal et al.
Anesth. Analg. 2007;105:1437-1441.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Iontophoretic transdermal system using fentanyl compared with patient-controlled intravenous analgesia using morphine for postoperative pain management
Grond et al.
Br J Anaesth 2007;98:806-815.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Emerging treatment modalities: Balancing efficacy and safety
Viscusi
Am J Health Syst Pharm 2007;64:S6-S11.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Transdermal patient-controlled analgesia
Maddox and Overdyk
Am J Health Syst Pharm 2007;64:25-25.
FULL TEXT
Fentanyl HCl iontophoretic transdermal system (ITS): clinical application of iontophoretic technology in the management of acute postoperative pain
Power
Br J Anaesth 2007;98:4-11.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Transdermal patient-controlled analgesia
Viscusi and Schechter
Am J Health Syst Pharm 2007;64:25-26.
FULL TEXT
Fentanyl HCl Patient-Controlled Iontophoretic Transdermal System for the Management of Acute Postoperative Pain
Mayes and Ferrone
The Annals of Pharmacotherapy 2006;40:2178-2186.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Patient-controlled analgesia: Finding a balance between cost and comfort
Viscusi and Schechter
Am J Health Syst Pharm 2006;63:S3-S13.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Opioid Analgesics in Primary Care: Challenges and New Advances in the Management of Noncancer Pain
Sinatra
J Am Board Fam Med 2006;19:165-177.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
An Iontophoretic Fentanyl Patient-Activated Analgesic Delivery System for Postoperative Pain: A Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial
Viscusi et al.
Anesth. Analg. 2006;102:188-194.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Patient-Controlled Analgesia
Grass
Anesth. Analg. 2005;101:S44-61.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Novel Depots of Ketorolac Esters Have Long-Acting Antinociceptive and Antiinflammatory Effects
Liu et al.
Anesth. Analg. 2005;101:785-792.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Postoperative pain management with a patient-controlled transdermal delivery system for fentanyl
Koo
Am J Health Syst Pharm 2005;62:1171-1176.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
|
