 |
|
Comparison of Performance of Traditional Medicare vs Medicare Managed Care
Bruce E. Landon, MD, MBA;
Alan M. Zaslavsky, PhD;
Shulamit L. Bernard, PhD;
Matthew J. Cioffi, MS;
Paul D. Cleary, PhD
JAMA. 2004;291:1744-1752.
Context Since 2000, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) has been collecting information on beneficiaries' experiences with health care for Medicare managed care (MMC) and traditional fee-for-service (FFS) Medicare.
Objectives To compare beneficiary experiences with managed care and FFS arrangements throughout the country and to assess the stability of those differences over time.
Design, Setting, and Participants CMS administered managed care and FFS versions of the Consumer Assessment of Health Plans Study (CAHPS) survey to samples of beneficiaries (aged  65 years) from Medicare + Choice MMC organizations and from geographic strata within the traditional FFS Medicare program. We analyzed responses collected in 2000 and 2001 from 497 869 respondents: 299 058 beneficiaries enrolled in MMC plans (response rate, 82%) and 198 811 enrolled in FFS Medicare (response rate, 68%). Differences between MMC and FFS within states were assessed after adjustment for case mix and nonresponse. For estimates at the regional and national level, state estimates were combined after weighting by the MMC enrollment in the state.
Main Outcome Measures Four overall ratings (of the plan, personal physician, care received overall, and care received from specialists), 5 measures summarizing beneficiaries' experiences with care (getting care needed; getting care quickly; communication with clinicians; courtesy and respect of physician's office staff; and paperwork, information, and customer service), and reports of receipt of 3 preventive services (flu shots, pneumococcal vaccinations, and being advised to quit smoking) were assessed.
Results Respondents in MMC and FFS plans were similar to each other and to the Medicare population as a whole. Nationally, FFS Medicare beneficiaries rated experiences with care measured by the CAHPS survey higher than did MMC beneficiaries; for instance, in ratings of care received overall (scale of 1-10) (8.91 FFS vs 8.86 MMC, P<.001, in 2000; and 8.88 FFS vs 8.78 MMC, P<.001, in 2001). Differences between FFS and MMC varied across states, however. Managed care enrollees reported significantly fewer problems with paperwork, information, and customer service (2.62 FFS vs 2.55 MMC, P<.001, in 2000; and 2.59 FFS vs 2.51 MMC, P<.001, in 2001). Enrollees in MMC were also more likely to report having received immunizations for influenza and pneumococcus (from any source) (in 2000, 77% of MMC vs 63% of FFS respondents; P<.001), and smokers were more likely to report having received counseling to quit smoking.
Conclusions Our data suggest that managed care was better at delivering preventive services, whereas traditional Medicare was better in other aspects of care related to access and beneficiary experiences. These relative strengths should be considered when policy decisions are made that affect the availability of choice or influence beneficiaries to choose one model of care over another.
Author Affiliations: Department of Health Care Policy, Harvard Medical School (Drs Landon, Zaslavsky, and Cleary and Mr Cioffi) and the Division of General Medicine and Primary Care, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (Dr Landon), Boston, Mass; and the Research Triangle Institute, Research Triangle Park, NC (Dr Bernard).
 CiteULike  Connotea  Del.icio.us  Digg  Reddit  Technorati
What's this?
RELATED LETTERS
Fee-for-Service vs Managed Care Medicine
Roger K. Howe
JAMA. 2004;292(2):170.
EXTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Fee-for-Service vs Managed Care Medicine—Reply
Bruce E. Landon, Alan M. Zaslavsky, and Paul D. Cleary
JAMA. 2004;292(2):170.
EXTRACT
| FULL TEXT
THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES
|
Capitation and enhanced fee-for-service models for primary care reform: a population-based evaluation
Glazier et al.
CMAJ 2009;180:E72-E81.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Rapidity and Modality of Imaging for Acute Low Back Pain in Elderly Patients
Pham et al.
Arch Intern Med 2009;169:972-981.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Patient Satisfaction and Its Relationship With Quality and Outcomes of Care After Acute Myocardial Infarction
Lee et al.
Circulation 2008;118:1938-1945.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Disenrollment From Medicare Managed Care Among Beneficiaries With and Without a Cancer Diagnosis
Elkin et al.
JNCI J Natl Cancer Inst 2008;100:1013-1021.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Use of Preventive Care by Elderly Male Veterans Receiving Care Through the Veterans Health Administration, Medicare Fee-for-Service, and Medicare HMO Plans
Keyhani et al.
Am. J. Public Health 2007;97:2179-2185.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Quality of Care in Medicaid Managed Care and Commercial Health Plans
Landon et al.
JAMA 2007;298:1674-1681.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Comparison of Data Quality for Reports and Ratings of Ambulatory Care by African American and White Medicare Managed Care Enrollees
Fongwa et al.
J Aging Health 2006;18:707-721.
ABSTRACT
Patient-reported service quality on a medicine unit
Weingart et al.
Int J Qual Health Care 2006;18:95-101.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Are Managed Care Medicare Beneficiaries With Chronic Conditions Satisfied With Their Care?
Pourat et al.
J Aging Health 2006;18:70-90.
Hearing the patient's voice? Factors affecting the use of patient survey data in quality improvement
Davies and Cleary
Qual Saf Health Care 2005;14:428-432.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Race/Ethnicity, Socioeconomic Status, and Satisfaction With Health Care
Haviland et al.
American Journal of Medical Quality 2005;20:195-203.
ABSTRACT
Fee-for-Service vs Managed Care Medicine
Howe
JAMA 2004;292:170-170.
FULL TEXT
|
