This Article  • Full text  • PDF  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Citation map  • Citing articles on HighWire  • Citing articles on ISI (125)  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Similar articles in JAMA  Topic Collections  • Patient-Physician Relationship/ Care  • Patient-Physician Communication  • Quality of Care  • Evidence-Based Medicine  • Alert me on articles by topic  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

Ronald M. Epstein, MD; Brian S. Alper, MD, MSPH; Timothy E. Quill, MD

JAMA. 2004;291:2359-2366.

Context  Informed patients are more likely to actively participate in their care, make wiser decisions, come to a common understanding with their physicians, and adhere more fully to treatment; however, currently there are no evidence-based guidelines for discussing clinical evidence with patients in the process of making medical decisions.

Objective  To identify ways to communicate evidence that improve patient understanding, involvement in decisions, and outcomes.

Data Sources and Study Selection  Systematic review of MEDLINE for the period 1966-2003 and review of reference lists of retrieved articles to identify original research dealing with communication between clinicians and patients and directly addressing methods of presenting clinical evidence to patients.

Data Extraction  Two investigators and a research assistant screened 367 abstracts and 2 investigators reviewed 51 full-text articles, yielding 8 potentially relevant articles.

Data Synthesis  Methods for communicating clinical evidence to patients include nonquantitative general terms, numerical translation of clinical evidence, graphical representations, and decision aids. Focus-group data suggest presenting options and/or equipoise before asking patients about preferred decision-making roles or formats for presenting details. Relative risk reductions may be misleading; absolute risk is preferred. Order of information presented and time-frame of outcomes can bias patient understanding. Limited evidence supports use of human stick figure graphics or faces for single probabilities and vertical bar graphs for comparative information. Less-educated and older patients preferred proportions to percentages and did not appreciate confidence intervals. Studies of decision aids rarely addressed patient-physician communication directly. No studies addressed clinical outcomes of discussions of clinical evidence.

Conclusions  There is a paucity of evidence to guide how physicians can most effectively share clinical evidence with patients facing decisions; however, basing our recommendations largely on related studies and expert opinion, we describe means of accomplishing 5 communication tasks to address in framing and communicating clinical evidence: understanding the patient's (and family members') experience and expectations; building partnership; providing evidence, including a balanced discussion of uncertainties; presenting recommendations informed by clinical judgment and patient preferences; and checking for understanding and agreement.

Author Affiliations: Rochester Center to Improve Communication in Health Care, Department of Family Medicine (Dr Epstein) and Departments of Internal Medicine (Dr Quill) and Psychiatry (Drs Quill and Epstein), University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY; Department of Family and Community Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Missouri-Columbia (Dr Alper); and Dynamic Medical Information Systems LLC, Columbia, Mo (Dr Alper).

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Errors in clinical reasoning: causes and remedial strategies
Scott
BMJ 2009;338:b1860-b1860.
FULL TEXT  

Information provision in fertility care: a call for improvement
Mourad et al.
Hum Reprod 2009;24:1420-1426.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Attitudes Toward Neonatal Intensive Care Treatment of Preterm Infants With a High Risk of Developing Long-term Disabilities
Lam et al.
Pediatrics 2009;123:1501-1508.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Development of life-expectancy tables for people with type 2 diabetes
Leal et al.
Eur Heart J 2009;30:834-839.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

A 41-Year-Old African American Man With Poorly Controlled Hypertension: Review of Patient and Physician Factors Related to Hypertension Treatment Adherence
Cooper
JAMA 2009;301:1260-1272.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Faculty Development to Change the Paradigm of Communication Skills Teaching in Oncology
Back et al.
JCO 2009;27:1137-1141.
FULL TEXT  

The Diagnosis of Tourette's Syndrome: Communication and Impact
Rivera-Navarro et al.
Clin Child Psychol Psychiatry 2009;14:13-23.
ABSTRACT  

Impact of Internet Use on Health-Related Behaviors and the Patient-Physician Relationship: A Survey-Based Study and Review
Iverson et al.
JAOA: Journal of the American Osteopathic Association 2008;108:699-711.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Standard versus patient-centred asthma education in the emergency department: a randomised study
Smith et al.
Eur Respir J 2008;31:990-997.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Patients Prefer Pictures to Numbers to Express Cardiovascular Benefit From Treatment
Goodyear-Smith et al.
Ann Fam Med 2008;6:213-217.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Hormone Therapy, Dilemmas, Medical Decisions.
Schulkin
J Law Med Ethics 2008;36:73-88.
 

Discussing Prognosis
Back et al.
Am Soc Clin Oncol Ed Book 2008;2008:135-138.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Communicating the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis - a qualitative study
Solari et al.
Mult Scler 2007;13:763-769.
ABSTRACT  

When the patient knows best: A challenge in translating clinical trial evidence into practice
Vickrey
Neurology 2007;68:1172-1173.
FULL TEXT  

Reassuring patients about normal test results
Penzien and Rains
BMJ 2007;334:325-325.
FULL TEXT  

Discussing Prognosis: "How Much Do You Want to Know?" Talking to Patients Who Are Prepared for Explicit Information
Back and Arnold
JCO 2006;24:4209-4213.
FULL TEXT  

Prophylactic Oophorectomy Reduces Breast Cancer Penetrance During Prospective, Long-Term Follow-Up of BRCA1 Mutation Carriers
Kramer et al.
JCO 2005;23:8629-8635.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Communicating Risk Information in Genetic Counseling: An Observational Study
Michie et al.
Health Educ Behav 2005;32:589-598.
ABSTRACT  

Prognosis and Decision Making in Severe Stroke
G. Holloway et al.
JAMA 2005;294:725-733.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Age and Time Need Not and Should Not Be Eliminated From the Coronary Risk Prediction Models
Vasan and D'Agostino
Circulation 2005;111:542-545.
FULL TEXT  

A Look Back...and Ahead
Helfand
Med Decis Making 2005;25:8-10.
 

Evidence informed policy making for health communication
Stewart et al.
Health Education Journal 2005;64:120-128.
ABSTRACT  

Potential Pitfalls of Disease-Specific Guidelines for Patients with Multiple Conditions
Tinetti et al.
NEJM 2004;351:2870-2874.
FULL TEXT  

The Biopsychosocial Model 25 Years Later: Principles, Practice, and Scientific Inquiry
Borrell-Carrio et al.
Ann Fam Med 2004;2:576-582.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

23 Apr 2004 to 23 Jul 2004
Evid. Based Nurs. 2004;7:e4-e4.
FULL TEXT  

Other articles noted
Evid. Based Med. 2004;9:e5-e5.
FULL TEXT  

HPV Communication: Review of Existing Research and Recommendations for Patient Education
Anhang et al.
CA Cancer J Clin 2004;54:248-259.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Correctional Health Care Systems and Collaboration With Academic Medicine
Kendig
JAMA 2004;292:501-503.
FULL TEXT