You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 291 No. 2, January 14, 2004 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Original Contribution
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (26)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related article
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Topic Collections
 •Pediatrics
 •Neonatology and Infant Care
 •Quality of Care
 •Quality of Care, Other
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Indirect vs Direct Hospital Quality Indicators for Very Low-Birth-Weight Infants

Jeannette A. Rogowski, PhD; Jeffrey D. Horbar, MD; Douglas O. Staiger, PhD; Michael Kenny, MS; Joseph Carpenter, MS; Jeffrey Geppert, MA

JAMA. 2004;291:202-209.

Context  Evidence-based selective referral strategies are being used by an increasing number of insurers to ensure that medical care is provided by high-quality providers. In the absence of direct-quality measures based on patient outcomes, the standards currently in place for many conditions rely on indirect-quality measures such as patient volume.

Objectives  To assess the potential usefulness of volume as a quality indicator for very low-birth-weight (VLBW) infants and compare volume with other potential indicators based on readily available hospital characteristics and patient outcomes.

Design, Setting, and Participants  A retrospective study of 94 110 VLBW infants weighing 501 to 1500 g born in 332 Vermont Oxford Network hospitals with neonatal intensive care units between January 1, 1995, and December 31, 2000.

Main Outcome Measures  Mortality among VLBW infants prior to discharge home; detailed case-mix adjustment was performed by using patient characteristics available immediately after birth.

Results  In hospitals with less than 50 annual admissions of VLBW infants, an additional 10 admissions were associated with an 11% reduction in mortality (95% confidence interval [CI], 5%-16%; P<.001). The annual volume of admissions only explained 9% of the variation across hospitals in mortality rates, and other readily available hospital characteristics explained an additional 7%. Historical volume was not significantly related to mortality rates in 1999-2000, implying that volume cannot prospectively identify high-quality providers. In contrast, hospitals in the lowest mortality quintile between 1995 and 1998 were found to have significantly lower mortality rates in 1999-2000 (odds ratio [OR], 0.64; 95% CI, 0.55-0.76; P<.001) and hospitals in the highest mortality quintile between 1995 and 1998 had significantly higher mortality rates in 1999-2000 (OR, 1.37; 95% CI, 1.16-1.64; P<.001). The percentage of hospital-level variation in mortality in 1999-2000 that was forecasted by the highest and lowest quintiles based on patient mortality was 34% compared with only 1% for the highest and lowest quintiles of volume.

Conclusions  Referral of VLBW infants based on indirect-quality indicators such as patient volume may be minimally effective. Direct measures based on patient outcomes are more useful quality indicators for the purposes of selective referral, as they are better predictors of future mortality rates among providers and could save more lives.


Author Affiliations: RAND, Arlington, Va (Dr Rogowski); Department of Pediatrics, University of Vermont College of Medicine and Vermont Oxford Network, Burlington (Dr Horbar); Department of Economics, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH, and the National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, Mass (Dr Staiger); Biometry Division, University of Vermont, Burlington (Mr Kenny); Vermont Oxford Network, Burlington (Mr Carpenter); and National Bureau of Economic Research, Palo Alto, Calif (Mr Geppert).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLE

Procedural Volume as a Marker of Quality for CABG Surgery
, , , , and
JAMA. ;291():195-201.
FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Black/White Differences in Very Low Birth Weight Neonatal Mortality Rates Among New York City Hospitals
Howell et al.
Pediatrics 2008;121:e407-e415.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Characteristics of Neonatal Units That Care for Very Preterm Infants in Europe: Results From the MOSAIC Study
Van Reempts et al.
Pediatrics 2007;120:e815-e825.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Level and Volume of Neonatal Intensive Care and Mortality in Very-Low-Birth-Weight Infants
Phibbs et al.
NEJM 2007;356:2165-2175.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The Effect of Birth in Secondary- or Tertiary-Level Hospitals in Finland on Mortality in Very Preterm Infants: A Birth-Register Study
Rautava et al.
Pediatrics 2007;119:e257-e263.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Hospital volume and neonatal mortality among very low birth weight infants.
Bartels et al.
Pediatrics 2006;117:2206-2214.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Hospital volume: operative morbidity, mortality and survival in thoracotomy for lung cancer.: A Spanish multicenter study of 2994 cases
Freixinet et al.
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg. 2006;29:20-25.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Mortality Among Very Low-Birthweight Infants in Hospitals Serving Minority Populations
Morales et al.
AJPH 2005;95:2206-2212.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Fostering Rational Regulation of Patient Safety
Mello et al.
Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law 2005;30:375-426.
ABSTRACT  

The volume-quality relationship: insufficient evidence for use as a quality indicator
Sheldon
Qual Saf Health Care 2004;13:325-326.
FULL TEXT  

Variations In The Quality Of Care For Very-Low-Birthweight Infants: Implications For Policy
Rogowski et al.
Health Aff (Millwood) 2004;23:88-97.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2004 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.