You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 291 No. 22, June 9, 2004 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  The Rational Clinical Examination
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (35)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Topic Collections
 •Pediatrics
 •Pediatrics, Other
 •Physical Examination
 •Diagnosis
 •The Rational Clinical Examination
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

CLINICIAN'S CORNER
Is This Child Dehydrated?

Michael J. Steiner, MD; Darren A. DeWalt, MD, MPH; Julie S. Byerley, MD, MPH

JAMA. 2004;291:2746-2754.

Context  The ability to assess the degree of dehydration quickly and accurately in infants and young children often determines patient treatment and disposition.

Objective  To systematically review the precision and accuracy of symptoms, signs, and basic laboratory tests for evaluating dehydration in infants and children.

Data Sources  We identified 1561 potential articles by multiple search strategies of the MEDLINE database through PubMed. Searches of bibliographies of retrieved articles, the Cochrane Library, textbooks, and private collections of experts in the field yielded an additional 42 articles.

Study Selection  Twenty-six of 1603 reviewed studies contained original data on the precision or accuracy of findings for the diagnosis of dehydration in young children (1 month to 5 years).

Data Extraction  Two of the 3 authors independently reviewed and abstracted data for estimating the likelihood ratios (LRs) of diagnostic tests. We eliminated 13 of the 26 studies because of the lack of an accepted diagnostic standard or other limitation in study design. The other 13 studies were included in the review.

Data Synthesis  The most useful individual signs for predicting 5% dehydration in children are an abnormal capillary refill time (LR, 4.1; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.7-9.8), abnormal skin turgor (LR, 2.5; 95% CI, 1.5-4.2), and abnormal respiratory pattern (LR, 2.0; 95% CI, 1.5-2.7). Combinations of examination signs perform markedly better than any individual sign in predicting dehydration. Historical points and laboratory tests have only modest utility for assessing dehydration.

Conclusions  The initial assessment of dehydration in young children should focus on estimating capillary refill time, skin turgor, and respiratory pattern and using combinations of other signs. The relative imprecision and inaccuracy of available tests limit the ability of clinicians to estimate the exact degree of dehydration.


Author Affiliations: Departments of Pediatrics (Drs Steiner, DeWalt, and Byerley) and Internal Medicine (Drs Steiner and DeWalt), University of North Carolina School of Medicine, and Robert Wood Johnson Clinical Scholars Program, University of North Carolina (Dr DeWalt), Chapel Hill. Dr Steiner is now at the Clinica Sierra Vista, Bakersfield, Calif.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Predictors of Outcomes in Pediatric Enteritis: A Prospective Cohort Study
Freedman et al.
Pediatrics 2009;123:e9-e16.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Validation of the Clinical Dehydration Scale for Children With Acute Gastroenteritis
Goldman et al.
Pediatrics 2008;122:545-549.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Does This Patient With Diabetes Have Osteomyelitis of the Lower Extremity?
Butalia et al.
JAMA 2008;299:806-813.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Skin turgor: author's response
Body
Emerg. Med. J. 2007;24:743-743.
FULL TEXT  

Is skin turgor reliable as a means of assessing hydration status in children?
Fayomi et al.
Emerg. Med. J. 2007;24:124-125.
FULL TEXT  

Acute gastroenteritis in children
Elliott
BMJ 2007;334:35-40.
FULL TEXT  

A Novel Imaging Technique to Measure Capillary-Refill Time: Improving Diagnostic Accuracy for Dehydration in Young Children With Gastroenteritis
Shavit et al.
Pediatrics 2006;118:2402-2408.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Oral ondansetron for gastroenteritis in a pediatric emergency department.
Freedman et al.
NEJM 2006;354:1698-1705.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Does the Clinical Examination Predict Lower Extremity Peripheral Arterial Disease?
Khan et al.
JAMA 2006;295:536-546.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Does This Patient Have Hearing Impairment?
Bagai et al.
JAMA 2006;295:416-428.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Review: capillary refill time, abnormal skin turgor, and abnormal respiratory pattern help to detect dehydration in children
Ball
EDUCATION AND PRACTICE 2005;90:ep51-ep51.
FULL TEXT  

Review: capillary refill time, abnormal skin turgor, and abnormal respiratory pattern are useful signs for detecting dehydration in children
Popov
Evid. Based Nurs. 2005;8:57-57.
FULL TEXT  

Review: capillary refill time, abnormal skin turgor, and abnormal respiratory pattern help to detect dehydration in children
Ball
Evid. Based Med. 2005;10:24-24.
FULL TEXT  

Hospital-Acquired Hyponatremia Is Associated With Excessive Administration of Intravenous Maintenance Fluid: In Reply
Moritz and Ayus
Pediatrics 2004;114:1368-1369.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2004 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.