You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 291 No. 3, January 21, 2004 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Original Contribution
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on ISI (9)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Topic Collections
 •Injury Prevention & Control
 •Alert me on articles by topic

Car Occupant Death According to the Restraint Use of Other Occupants

A Matched Cohort Study

Peter Cummings, MD, MPH; Frederick P. Rivara, MD, MPH

JAMA. 2004;291:343-349.

Context  A car occupant could be killed if struck by another occupant who was catapulted forward, backward, or sideways in a crash.

Objective  To estimate the association between death of a car occupant (the target) and restraint use by other occupants.

Design  Matched-pair cohort study comparing the outcomes of 2 target occupants in the same passenger car that crashed.

Setting  United States traffic crashes in 1988-2000, using data from the Fatality Analysis Reporting System.

Subjects  Target pairs, at least 1 of whom died: 61 834 front-seat pairs, 5278 rear-seat pairs, and 21 127 pairs on the left or right side.

Main Outcome Measures  Adjusted risk ratio (RR) for death within 30 days of a crash.

Results  The risk of death was greater for a restrained front target occupant in front of an unrestrained occupant compared with a restrained front target in front of a restrained occupant (adjusted RR, 1.20; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.10-1.31). For a restrained rear target occupant behind an unrestrained occupant compared with a restrained rear target occupant behind a restrained occupant, the adjusted RR was 1.22 (95% CI, 1.10-1.36). For a restrained side target occupant sitting next to an unrestrained occupant compared with a restrained side target occupant sitting next to a restrained occupant, the adjusted RR was 1.15 (95% CI, 1.08-1.22). Among unrestrained target occupants, the adjusted RRs were, for front targets, 1.04 (95% CI, 0.97-1.12), rear targets, 1.22 (95% CI, 1.10-1.36), and side targets, 0.85 (95% CI, 0.80-0.92).

Conclusion  Persons who wish to reduce their risk of death in a crash should wear their own restraint and should ask others in the same car to use their restraints.


Author Affiliations: Harborview Injury Prevention and Research Center (Drs Cummings and Rivara) and Departments of Epidemiology (Drs Cummings and Rivara) and Pediatrics (Dr Rivara), University of Washington, Seattle.



THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Pattern of seat belt wearing in Nanjing, China
Routley et al.
Inj. Prev. 2007;13:388-393.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

One relative risk versus two odds ratios: implications for meta-analyses involving paired and unpaired binary data
Zou
Clin Trials 2007;4:25-31.
ABSTRACT  

Association of First- and Second-Generation Air Bags with Front Occupant Death in Car Crashes: A Matched Cohort Study
Olson et al.
Am J Epidemiol 2006;164:161-169.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Unsafe driving in North American automobile commercials
Shin et al.
J Public Health (Oxf) 2005;27:318-325.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Buckle Up!
JWatch Emergency Med. 2004;2004:2-2.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2004 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.