You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 291 No. 5, February 4, 2004 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Special Communication
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on ISI (33)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Topic Collections
 •Statistics and Research Methods
 •Medical Ethics
 •Complementary and Alternative Medicine
 •Alert me on articles by topic

Ethical Issues Concerning Research in Complementary and Alternative Medicine

Franklin G. Miller, PhD; Ezekiel J. Emanuel, MD; Donald L. Rosenstein, MD; Stephen E. Straus, MD

JAMA. 2004;291:599-604.

The use of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) has grown dramatically in recent years, as has research on the safety and efficacy of CAM treatments. Minimal attention, however, has been devoted to the ethical issues relating to research on CAM. We argue that public health and safety demand rigorous research evaluating CAM therapies, research on CAM should adhere to the same ethical requirements for all clinical research, and randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trials should be used for assessing the efficacy of CAM treatments whenever feasible and ethically justifiable. In addition, we explore the legitimacy of providing CAM and conventional therapies that have been demonstrated to be effective only by virtue of the placebo effect.


Author Affiliations: Department of Clinical Bioethics, Warren Grant Magnuson Clinical Center (Drs Miller and Emanuel); Office of the Clinical Director, National Institute of Mental Health (Dr Rosenstein); and National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine (Dr Straus), National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Md.



THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Acupuncture trials and informed consent
Miller and Kaptchuk
J. Med. Ethics 2007;33:43-44.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Sham device v inert pill: randomised controlled trial of two placebo treatments
Kaptchuk et al.
BMJ 2006;332:391-397.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Is Acupuncture Analgesia an Expectancy Effect?: Preliminary Evidence Based on Participants' Perceived Assignments in Two Placebo-Controlled Trials
Bausell et al.
Eval Health Prof 2005;28:9-26.
ABSTRACT  

The Challenges of Randomized Trials in Integrative Cancer Care
Block et al.
Integr Cancer Ther 2004;3:112-127.
 

Ethical Issues in Research in Complementary and Alternative Medicine
Cantor and Malani
JAMA 2004;291:2192-2192.
FULL TEXT  

Ethical Issues in Research in Complementary and Alternative Medicine
Kaptchuk and Lembo
JAMA 2004;291:2193-2193.
FULL TEXT  

Ethical Issues in Research in Complementary and Alternative Medicine
Jonas et al.
JAMA 2004;291:2192-2192.
FULL TEXT  

Ethical Issues in Research in Complementary and Alternative Medicine
Marusic
JAMA 2004;291:2193-2193.
FULL TEXT  

Ethical Issues in Research in Complementary and Alternative Medicine
Millea
JAMA 2004;291:2193-2193.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2004 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.