 |
|
Different Patterns of Duplicate Publication
An Analysis of Articles Used in Systematic Reviews
Erik von Elm, MD;
Greta Poglia;
Bernhard Walder, MD;
Martin R. Tramèr, MD, DPhil
JAMA. 2004;291:974-980.
Context Duplicate publication is publication of an article that overlaps substantially with an article published elsewhere. Patterns of duplication are not well understood.
Objective To investigate duplication patterns and propose a decision tree for classification.
Data Sources We searched a comprehensive list of systematic reviews (1989 through August 15, 2002) in anesthesia and analgesia that is accessible on the Internet. We selected published full articles of duplicates that had been identified in these systematic reviews. Abstracts, letters, or book chapters were excluded.
Study Selection and Data Extraction Authors of 56 (40%) of 141 systematic reviews acknowledged identification of duplicates. Duplication patterns were identified independently by all investigators comparing samples and outcomes of pairs of duplicates and main articles. Information on cross-reference, sponsorship, authorship, and publication characteristics was extracted from the articles.
Data Synthesis The 56 systematic reviews included 1131 main articles (129 337 subjects) and excluded 103 duplicates (12 589 subjects) that originated from 78 main articles. Sixty articles were published twice, 13 three times, 3 four times, and 2 five times. We identified 6 duplication patterns: (1A) identical samples and identical outcomes (21 pairs); (1B) same as 1A but several duplicates assembled (n = 16); (2) identical samples and different outcomes (n = 24); (3A) increasing sample and identical outcomes (n = 11); (3B) decreasing sample and identical outcomes (n = 11); (4) different samples and different outcomes (n = 20). The prevalence of covert duplicate articles (without a cross-reference to the main article) was 5.3% (65/1234). Of the duplicates, 34 (33%) were sponsored by the pharmaceutical industry, and 66 (64%) had authorship that differed partly or completely from the main article. The median journal impact factor was 1.8 (range, 0.1-29.5) for duplicates and 2.0 (range, 0.4-29.5) for main articles (P = .13). The median annual citation rate was 1.7 (range, 0-27) for duplicates and 2.1 (range, 0-31) for main articles (P = .45). The median number of authors was 4 (range, 1-14) for duplicates and 4 (range, 1-15) for corresponding main articles (P = .02). The median delay in publication between main articles and duplicates was 1 year (range, 0-7 years).
Conclusions Duplication goes beyond simple copying. Six distinct duplication patterns were identified after comparing study samples and outcomes of duplicates and corresponding main articles. Authorship was an unreliable criterion. Duplicates were published in journals with similar impact factors and were cited as frequently as main articles.
Author Affiliations: Division of Anesthesiology, Department of Anesthesiology, Pharmacology, and Surgical Intensive Care, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland. Dr von Elm is now with the Department of Social and Preventive Medicine, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland; and Mrs Poglia is now with the Department of Psychiatry, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland.
 CiteULike  Connotea  Del.icio.us  Digg  Reddit  Technorati
What's this?
RELATED LETTER
Trial Registration to Prevent Duplicate Publication
Gerd Antes and Kay Dickersin
JAMA. 2004;291(20):2432.
EXTRACT
| FULL TEXT
THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES
|
The Roman Article: Read It Again--in the Same Journal
DeAngelis
JAMA 2009;301:1382-1383.
FULL TEXT
Deja vu: a database of highly similar citations in the scientific literature
Errami et al.
Nucleic Acids Res 2009;37:D921-D924.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Meta-analysis: Antibiotics for Prophylaxis against Hemodialysis Catheter-Related Infections
James et al.
ANN INTERN MED 2008;148:596-605.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Deja vu A study of duplicate citations in Medline
Errami et al.
Bioinformatics 2008;24:243-249.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Methodology for Dealing With Duplicate Study Effects in a Meta-Analysis
Wood
Organizational Research Methods 2008;11:79-95.
ABSTRACT
eTBLAST: a web server to identify expert reviewers, appropriate journals and similar publications
Errami et al.
Nucleic Acids Res 2007;35:W12-W15.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
The Illinois White Paper: Improving the System for Protecting Human Subjects: Counteracting IRB "Mission Creep"
Gunsalus et al.
Qualitative Inquiry 2007;13:617-649.
ABSTRACT
What else can you expect at www.erj.ersjournals.com?
Sterk and Rabe
Eur Respir J 2007;29:1-3.
FULL TEXT
Respiratory Physiotherapy To Prevent Pulmonary Complications After Abdominal Surgery: A Systematic Review
Pasquina et al.
Chest 2006;130:1887-1899.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Editing the ERJ: an observational study.
Rabe and Sterk
Eur Respir J 2006;27:1-2.
FULL TEXT
Consortium of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery Journals to Collaborate in Maintenance of High Ethical Standards
Benninger et al.
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2005;131:381-382.
FULL TEXT
Good research conduct
Grigg
Arch. Dis. Child. 2005;90:229-232.
FULL TEXT
Duplicate Publication
Rivara et al.
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2004;158:926-926.
FULL TEXT
Trial Registration to Prevent Duplicate Publication
Antes and Dickersin
JAMA 2004;291:2432-2432.
FULL TEXT
|
