 |
|
Outbreak of Pseudomonas aeruginosa Infections Caused by Commercial Piercing of Upper Ear Cartilage
William E. Keene, PhD, MPH;
Amy C. Markum, RN, BSN;
Mansour Samadpour, PhD
JAMA. 2004;291:981-985.
Context Sporadic infections following ear piercing are well documented, but common-source outbreaks are rarely recognized.
Objective To investigate reports of auricular chondritis subsequent to commercial ear piercing.
Design, Setting, and Subjects Outbreak investigation by Oregon public health agencies, including cohort study of persons pierced at a jewelry kiosk in August-September 2000, environmental sampling, and molecular subtyping of isolates. Confirmed cases had Pseudomonas aeruginosa cultured from ear wounds. Suspected cases had signs and symptoms of external ear infection, including drainage of pus or blood for at least 14 days.
Main Outcome Measures Risk factors for infection and comparison of bacterial isolates by molecular subtyping.
Results From 186 piercings in 118 individuals, we identified 7 confirmed P aeruginosa infections and 18 suspected infections. Confirmed cases were 10 to 19 years old. Most were initially treated with antibiotics ineffective against Pseudomonas. Four were hospitalized, 4 underwent incision and drainage surgeries (1 as an outpatient), and several were cosmetically deformed. Upper ear cartilage piercing was more likely to result in either confirmed or suspected infection than was lobe piercing (confirmed: RR undefined, P<.001; suspected: RR, 3.6; 95% confidence interval, 1.5-8.5). All persons with confirmed infections had their ear cartilage pierced with an open, spring-loaded piercing gun. Patient isolates were indistinguishable by molecular subtyping, and matching isolates were recovered from a disinfectant bottle and nearby sink. At least 1 worker admitted sometimes spraying the disinfectant on the ear studs before piercing.
Conclusions Ear cartilage piercing is inherently more risky than lobe piercing. Clinicians should respond aggressively to potential auricular chondritis and consider Pseudomonas a possible cause pending culture results.
Author Affiliations: Acute & Communicable Disease Program, Oregon Department of Human Services, Portland (Dr Keene); Klamath County Department of Public Health, Klamath Falls, Ore (Ms Markum); and Department of Environmental Health, University of Washington School of Public Health, Seattle (Dr Samadpour). Dr Samadpour is now with the Institute for Environmental Health, Seattle.
 CiteULike  Connotea  Del.icio.us  Digg  Reddit  Technorati  Twitter
What's this?
RELATED ARTICLE
Body Piercing
Janet M. Torpy, Cassio Lynm, and Richard M. Glass
JAMA. 2004;291(8):1024.
EXTRACT
| FULL TEXT
THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES
|
Appraising the need for tighter control over the practices of the tattooing and body piercing industry
Chalmers
British Journal of Infection Control 2009;10:134-137.
ABSTRACT
Sonography of the Ear Pinna
Wortsman and Jemec
J Ultrasound Med 2008;27:761-770.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Pseudomonas aeruginosa otochondritis complicating localized cutaneous leishmaniasis: prevention of mutilation by early antibiotic therapy.
VAN DER VLIET et al.
Am J Trop Med Hyg 2006;75:270-272.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Pseudomonas Infections Caused By Commercial Piercing of Upper Ear Cartilage
Brookman
AAP Grand Rounds 2004;11:53-54.
FULL TEXT
Infections caused by cartilage piercing
Kemp
AAP News 2004;24:214-214.
FULL TEXT
Commercial Ear Piercing More Risky in Cartilage Than in the Earlobe
Journal Watch Dermatology 2004;2004:3-3.
FULL TEXT
Infection After Ear Piercing -- Think Pseudomonas
JWatch Pediatrics 2004;2004:7-7.
FULL TEXT
|
