You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 291 No. 9, March 3, 2004 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Original Contribution
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (56)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Topic Collections
 •Oncology
 •Oncology, Other
 •Quality of Life
 •Randomized Controlled Trial
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Effect of Neurolytic Celiac Plexus Block on Pain Relief, Quality of Life, and Survival in Patients With Unresectable Pancreatic Cancer

A Randomized Controlled Trial

Gilbert Y. Wong, MD; Darrell R. Schroeder, MS; Paul E. Carns, MD; Jack L. Wilson, MD; David P. Martin, MD, PhD; Michelle O. Kinney, MD; Carlos B. Mantilla, MD, PhD; David O. Warner, MD

JAMA. 2004;291:1092-1099.

Context  Pancreatic cancer is an aggressive tumor associated with high mortality. Optimal pain control may improve quality of life (QOL) for these patients.

Objective  To test the hypothesis that neurolytic celiac plexus block (NCPB) vs opioids alone improves pain relief, QOL, and survival in patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer.

Design, Setting, and Patients  Double-blind, randomized clinical trial conducted at Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn. Enrolled (October 1997 and January 2001) were 100 eligible patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer experiencing pain. Patients were followed up for at least 1 year or until death.

Intervention  Patients were randomly assigned to receive either NCPB or systemic analgesic therapy alone with a sham injection. All patients could receive additional opioids managed by a clinician blinded to the treatment assignment.

Main Outcome Measures  Pain intensity (0-10 numerical rating scale), QOL, opioid consumption and related adverse effects, and survival time were assessed weekly by a blinded observer.

Results  Mean (SD) baseline pain was 4.4 (1.7) for NCPB vs 4.1 (1.8) for opioids alone. The first week after randomization, pain intensity and QOL scores were improved (pain intensity, P<=.01 for both groups; QOL, P<.001 for both groups), with a larger decrease in pain for the NCPB group (P = .005). From repeated measures analysis, pain was also lower for NCPB over time (P = .01). However, opioid consumption (P = .93), frequency of opioid adverse effects (all P>.10), and QOL (P = .46) were not significantly different between groups. In the first 6 weeks, fewer NCPB patients reported moderate or severe pain (pain intensity rating of >=5/10) vs opioid-only patients (14% vs 40%, P = .005). At 1 year, 16% of NCPB patients and 6% of opioid-only patients were alive. However, survival did not differ significantly between groups (P = .26, proportional hazards regression).

Conclusion  Although NCPB improves pain relief in patients with pancreatic cancer vs optimized systemic analgesic therapy alone, it does not affect QOL or survival.


Author Affiliations: Department of Anesthesiology and Division of Pain Medicine, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine (Drs Wong, Carns, Wilson, Martin, Kinney, Mantilla, and Warner) and Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic (Mr Schroeder), Rochester, Minn.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Interventional Approaches to Treating Cancer Pain
Fine and Brogan
Am Soc Clin Oncol Ed Book 2009;2009:583-588.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Biology and management of pancreatic cancer
Ghaneh et al.
Postgrad. Med. J. 2008;84:478-497.
FULL TEXT  

Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer 2008: Is the Glass Less Empty?
Nieto et al.
The Oncologist 2008;13:562-576.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Biology and management of pancreatic cancer
Ghaneh et al.
Gut 2007;56:1134-1152.
FULL TEXT  

Impacting Quality of Life for Patients With Advanced Cancer With a Structured Multidisciplinary Intervention: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Rummans et al.
JCO 2006;24:635-642.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Does an oral analgesic protocol improve pain control for patients with cancer? An intergroup study coordinated by the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group
Cleeland et al.
Ann Oncol 2005;16:972-980.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

An implantable drug delivery system (IDDS) for refractory cancer pain provides sustained pain control, less drug-related toxicity, and possibly better survival compared with comprehensive medical management (CMM)
Smith et al.
Ann Oncol 2005;16:825-833.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Neurolytic Celiac Plexus Block for Pancreatic Cancer Pain?
JWatch Gastroenterology 2004;2004:6-6.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2004 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.