 |
|
JAMA-EXPRESS
Safety and Efficacy of Enoxaparin vs Unfractionated Heparin in Patients With Non–ST-Segment Elevation Acute Coronary Syndromes Who Receive Tirofiban and Aspirin
A Randomized Controlled Trial
Michael A. Blazing, MD;
James A. de Lemos, MD;
Harvey D. White, MD;
Keith A. A. Fox, MD;
Freek W. A. Verheugt, MD;
Diego Ardissino, MD;
Peter M. DiBattiste, MD;
Joanne Palmisano, MD;
David W. Bilheimer, MD;
Steven M. Snapinn, PhD;
Karen E. Ramsey, BS, RPh;
Laura H. Gardner, BSPH;
Vic Hasselblad, PhD;
Marc A. Pfeffer, MD, PhD;
Eldrin F. Lewis, MD;
Eugene Braunwald, MD;
Robert M. Califf, MD; for the A to Z Investigators
JAMA. 2004;292:55-64.
Context Enoxaparin or the combination of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor tirofiban with unfractionated heparin independently have shown superior efficacy over unfractionated heparin alone in patients with non–ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes (ACS). It is not clear if combining enoxaparin with glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors is as safe or as effective as the current standard combination of unfractionated heparin with glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors.
Objective To assess efficacy and safety of the combination of enoxaparin and tirofiban compared with unfractionated heparin and tirofiban in patients with non–ST-elevation ACS.
Design, Setting, and Participants A prospective, international, open-label, randomized, noninferiority trial of 1 mg/kg of enoxaparin every 12 hours (n = 2026) compared with weight-adjusted intravenous unfractionated heparin (n = 1961) in patients with non–ST-elevation ACS receiving tirofiban and aspirin. Phase A of the A to Z trial was conducted between December 1999 and May 2002.
Main Outcome Measures Death, recurrent myocardial infarction, or refractory ischemia at 7 days in the intent-to-treat population with boundaries set for superiority and noninferiority. Safety based on measures of bleeding using the Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) classification system.
Results A total of 169 (8.4%) of 2018 patients randomized to enoxaparin experienced death, myocardial infarction, or refractory ischemia at 7 days compared with 184 (9.4%) of 1952 patients randomized to unfractionated heparin (hazard ratio [HR], 0.88; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.71-1.08). This met the prespecified criterion for noninferiority. All components of the composite primary and secondary end points favored enoxaparin except death, which occurred in only 1% of patients (23 for enoxaparin and 17 for unfractionated heparin). Rates for any TIMI grade bleeding were low (3.0% for enoxaparin and 2.2% for unfractionated heparin; P = .13). Using a worst-case approach that combined 2 independent bleeding evaluations, use of enoxaparin was associated with 1 additional TIMI major bleeding episode for each 200 patients treated.
Conclusions In patients receiving tirofiban and aspirin, enoxaparin is a suitable alternative to unfractionated heparin for treatment of non–ST-elevation ACS. The 12% relative and 1% absolute reductions in the primary end point in favor of enoxaparin met criterion for noninferiority and are consistent with prior trials performed without the use of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors.
Author Affiliations: Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, NC (Drs Blazing, Hasselblad, and Califf and Ms Gardner); Donald W. Reynolds Cardiovascular Clinical Research Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas (Dr de Lemos); Department of Cardiology, Green Lane Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand (Dr White); Department of Cardiology Research, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Scotland (Dr Fox); Department of Interventional Cardiology, University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (Dr Verheugt); Division of Cardiology, Ospedale Maggiore, Parma, Italy (Dr Ardissino); Merck & Company, Whitehouse Station, NJ (Drs DiBattiste, Palmisano, Bilheimer, and Snapinn and Ms Ramsey); and Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Mass (Drs Pfeffer, Lewis, and Braunwald).
RELATED LETTER
Enoxaparin vs Unfractionated Heparin in Acute Coronary Syndrome
Michael Pedrini, Frank Hartig, and Christoph Pechlaner
JAMA. 2004;292(16):1952.
EXTRACT
| FULL TEXT
RELATED ARTICLES
Fractionating Heparins and Their Clinical Trial Data—Something for Everyone
Pranab Das and David J. Moliterno
JAMA. 2004;292(1):101-103.
EXTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Enoxaparin vs Unfractionated Heparin in High-Risk Patients With Non–ST-Segment Elevation Acute Coronary Syndromes Managed With an Intended Early Invasive Strategy: Primary Results of the SYNERGY Randomized Trial
SYNERGY Trial Investigators
JAMA. 2004;292(1):45-54.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Efficacy and Bleeding Complications Among Patients Randomized to Enoxaparin or Unfractionated Heparin for Antithrombin Therapy in Non–ST-Segment Elevation Acute Coronary Syndromes: A Systematic Overview
John L. Petersen, Kenneth W. Mahaffey, Vic Hasselblad, Elliott M. Antman, Marc Cohen, Shaun G. Goodman, Anatoly Langer, Michael A. Blazing, Anne Le-Moigne-Amrani, James A. de Lemos, Christopher C. Nessel, Robert A. Harrington, James J. Ferguson, Eugene Braunwald, and Robert M. Califf
JAMA. 2004;292(1):89-96.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES
|
Outcomes in elderly patients with acute coronary syndromes randomized to enoxaparin vs. unfractionated heparin: results from the SYNERGY trial
Lopes et al.
Eur Heart J 2008;29:1827-1833.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Optimizing antithrombotic therapy in patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome
Dobesh et al.
Am J Health Syst Pharm 2008;65:S22-S28.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
2007 Guideline Update for Unstable Angina/Non-ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction: Focus on Antiplatelet and Anticoagulant Therapies
Coons and Battistone
The Annals of Pharmacotherapy 2008;42:989-1001.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Antithrombotic Therapy for Non-ST-Segment Elevation Acute Coronary Syndromes: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines (8th Edition)
Harrington et al.
Chest 2008;133:670S-707S.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Bleeding risk and the management of bleeding complications in patients undergoing anticoagulant therapy: focus on new anticoagulant agents
Crowther and Warkentin
Blood 2008;111:4871-4879.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Serial Measurement of Monocyte Chemoattractant Protein-1 After Acute Coronary Syndromes: Results From the A to Z Trial
de Lemos et al.
J Am Coll Cardiol 2007;50:2117-2124.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Efficacy and safety of the low-molecular weight heparin enoxaparin compared with unfractionated heparin across the acute coronary syndrome spectrum: a meta-analysis
Murphy et al.
Eur Heart J 2007;28:2077-2086.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
ACC/AHA 2007 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Unstable Angina/Non-ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Revise the 2002 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Unstable Angina/Non-ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction) Developed in Collaboration with the American College of Emergency Physicians, the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and the Society of Thoracic Surgeons Endorsed by the American Association of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Rehabilitation and the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine
Anderson et al.
J Am Coll Cardiol 2007;50:e1-e157.
FULL TEXT
ACC/AHA 2007 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Unstable Angina/Non ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction Executive Summary: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Revise the 2002 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Unstable Angina/Non ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction) Developed in Collaboration with the American College of Emergency Physicians, the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and the Society of Thoracic Surgeons Endorsed by the American Association of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Rehabilitation and the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine
Anderson et al.
J Am Coll Cardiol 2007;50:652-726.
FULL TEXT
Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes: The Task Force for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Non-ST-Segment Elevation Acute Coronary Syndromes of the European Society of Cardiology
Authors/Task Force Members et al.
Eur Heart J 2007;28:1598-1660.
FULL TEXT
Acute Coronary Care in the Elderly, Part I: Non-ST-Segment-Elevation Acute Coronary Syndromes: A Scientific Statement for Healthcare Professionals From the American Heart Association Council on Clinical Cardiology: In Collaboration With the Society of Geriatric Cardiology
Alexander et al.
Circulation 2007;115:2549-2569.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Anticoagulants in heart disease: current status and perspectives
De Caterina et al.
Eur Heart J 2007;0:ehl492v1-34.
FULL TEXT
The Cardiovascular Disease Continuum Validated: Clinical Evidence of Improved Patient Outcomes: Part II: Clinical Trial Evidence (Acute Coronary Syndromes Through Renal Disease) and Future Directions
Dzau et al.
Circulation 2006;114:2871-2891.
FULL TEXT
A Subgroup Analysis of the Impact of Prerandomization Antithrombin Therapy on Outcomes in the SYNERGY Trial: Enoxaparin Versus Unfractionated Heparin in Non-ST-Segment Elevation Acute Coronary Syndromes
Cohen et al.
J Am Coll Cardiol 2006;48:1346-1354.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Good Enough: A Primer on the Analysis and Interpretation of Noninferiority Trials
Kaul and Diamond
ANN INTERN MED 2006;145:62-69.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Angiographic and Clinical Outcomes in Patients Receiving Low-Molecular-Weight Heparin Versus Unfractionated Heparin in ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction Treated With Fibrinolytics in the CLARITY-TIMI 28 Trial
Sabatine et al.
Circulation 2005;112:3846-3854.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
The Year in Non--ST-Segment Elevation Acute Coronary Syndromes
Giugliano and Braunwald
J Am Coll Cardiol 2005;46:906-919.
FULL TEXT
Routine vs Selective Invasive Strategies in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndromes: A Collaborative Meta-analysis of Randomized Trials
Mehta et al.
JAMA 2005;293:2908-2917.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
The year in interventional cardiology
O'Neill et al.
J Am Coll Cardiol 2005;45:1117-1134.
FULL TEXT
Guidelines for Percutaneous Coronary Interventions: The Task Force for Percutaneous Coronary Interventions of the European Society of Cardiology
Authors/Task Force Members et al.
Eur Heart J 2005;26:804-847.
FULL TEXT
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention and Adjunctive Pharmacotherapy in Women: A Statement for Healthcare Professionals From the American Heart Association
Lansky et al.
Circulation 2005;111:940-953.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
A Simplified Approach to the Management of Non-ST-Segment Elevation Acute Coronary Syndromes
Gluckman et al.
JAMA 2005;293:349-357.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Role of Low-Molecular-Weight Heparin in Invasive Management of Non-ST-Elevation Acute Coronary Syndromes
Moser and Kalus
The Annals of Pharmacotherapy 2004;38:2094-2104.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Enoxaparin vs Unfractionated Heparin in Acute Coronary Syndrome
Pedrini et al.
JAMA 2004;292:1952-1952.
FULL TEXT
Enoxaparin vs Unfractionated Heparin in Acute Coronary Syndrome
Kanna and Sharma
JAMA 2004;292:1952-1952.
FULL TEXT
Enoxaparin in non-ST segment elevation acute coronary syndromes: duration of therapy is essential to benefit
Steg and Juliard
Eur Heart J 2004;25:1667-1669.
FULL TEXT
Enoxaparin versus unfractionated heparin in patients treated with tirofiban, aspirin and an early conservative initial management strategy: results from the A phase of the A-to-Z trial
de Lemos et al.
Eur Heart J 2004;25:1688-1694.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
JournalScan
Malik
Heart 2004;90:1235-1236.
FULL TEXT
Early Intensive vs a Delayed Conservative Simvastatin Strategy in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndromes: Phase Z of the A to Z Trial
de Lemos et al.
JAMA 2004;292:1307-1316.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Enoxaparin vs. UFH for Non-ST-Segment-Elevation ACS
Journal Watch Cardiology 2004;2004:2-2.
FULL TEXT
Which Type of Heparin for Non-ST-Segment-Elevation Acute Coronary Syndromes?
JWatch General 2004;2004:3-3.
FULL TEXT
Enoxaparin vs Unfractionated Heparin in High-Risk Patients With Non-ST-Segment Elevation Acute Coronary Syndromes Managed With an Intended Early Invasive Strategy: Primary Results of the SYNERGY Randomized Trial
SYNERGY Trial Investigators
JAMA 2004;292:45-54.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Efficacy and Bleeding Complications Among Patients Randomized to Enoxaparin or Unfractionated Heparin for Antithrombin Therapy in Non-ST-Segment Elevation Acute Coronary Syndromes: A Systematic Overview
Petersen et al.
JAMA 2004;292:89-96.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Fractionating Heparins and Their Clinical Trial Data--Something for Everyone
Das and Moliterno
JAMA 2004;292:101-103.
FULL TEXT
|
