You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 292 No. 10, September 8, 2004 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Original Contribution
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on ISI (9)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related letter
 •Related article
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Topic Collections
 •Neurology
 •Musculoskeletal Syndromes (Chronic Fatigue, Gulf War)
 •Randomized Controlled Trial
 •Alert me on articles by topic

Effect of Galantamine Hydrobromide in Chronic Fatigue Syndrome

A Randomized Controlled Trial

C. V. Russell Blacker, FRCPsych, MD; David T. Greenwood, PhD; Keith A. Wesnes, PhD; Rosamund Wilson, PhD; Carol Woodward, BSc; Ian Howe, MD; Tauhid Ali, MSc

JAMA. 2004;292:1195-1204.

Context  There is no established pharmacological treatment for the core symptoms of chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS). Galantamine hydrobromide, an acetyl cholesterone inhibitor, has pharmacological properties that might benefit patients with CFS.

Objective  To compare the efficacy and tolerability of galantamine hydrobromide in patients with CFS.

Design, Setting, and Patients  Randomized, double-blind trial conducted June 1997 through July 1999 at 35 outpatient centers in the United Kingdom (n = 17), United States (n = 14), the Netherlands (n = 2), Sweden (n = 1), and Belgium (n = 1) involving 434 patients with a clinical diagnosis of CFS (modified US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention criteria).

Interventions  A total of 89 patients were randomly assigned to receive 2.5 mg of galantamine hydrobromide; 86 patients, 5.0 mg; 91 patients, 7.5 mg; and 86 patients, 10 mg (these patients received medicine in the tablet form 3 times per day); a total of 82 patients received matching placebo tablets 3 times per day.

Main Outcome Measures  The primary efficacy variable was the global change on the Clinician Global Impression Scale after 4, 8, 12, and 16 weeks of treatment. Secondary outcomes were changes in core symptoms of CFS on the Chalder Fatigue Rating Scale, the Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire, and the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index; changes in quality of life on the Nottingham Health Profile; and assessment of plasma-free cortisol levels and cognitive performance on a computer-based battery of tests.

Results  After 16 weeks, there were no statistically significant differences between any of the galantamine or placebo groups in clinical condition on the Clinician Global Impression Scale, or for any of the secondary end points. Exploratory regression analysis failed to detect any consistent prognostic factor that might have influenced the primary or any secondary outcome measures.

Conclusion  This trial did not demonstrate any benefit of galantamine over placebo in the treatment of patients with CFS.


Author Affiliations: Department of Health and Social Sciences, University of Exeter, Exeter, England (Dr Blacker); Marix Drug Development Ltd, Cardiff, England (Dr Greenwood); PPD Development, Cambridge, England (Ms Woodward); Cognitive Drug Research Ltd, Goring-on-Thames, England (Dr Wesnes); Spica Consultants Ltd, East Grafton, England (Dr Wilson); Shire Pharmaceutical Development Ltd, Hampshire, England (Dr Howe); and Bioenvision Ltd, Edinburgh, Scotland (Mr Ali).


RELATED LETTER

Chronic Fatigue Syndrome and the Cholinergic Hypothesis
Peter V. Madill
JAMA. 2004;292(22):2723.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

RELATED ARTICLE

Pharmacotherapy of Chronic Fatigue Syndrome: Another Gallant Attempt
Stephen E. Straus
JAMA. 2004;292(10):1234-1235.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Interventions for the treatment, management and rehabilitation of patients with chronic fatigue syndrome/myalgic encephalomyelitis: an updated systematic review.
Chambers et al.
JRSM 2006;99:506-520.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Cognitive behaviour therapy for adolescents with chronic fatigue syndrome: Data are insufficient and conclusion inappropriate
Chaudhuri
BMJ 2005;330:789-790.
FULL TEXT  

The Placebo Response in the Treatment of Chronic Fatigue Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Cho et al.
Psychosom. Med. 2005;67:301-313.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Chronic Fatigue Syndrome and the Cholinergic Hypothesis
Madill
JAMA 2004;292:2723-2723.
FULL TEXT  

Pharmacotherapy of Chronic Fatigue Syndrome: Another Gallant Attempt
Straus
JAMA 2004;292:1234-1235.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2004 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.