You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 292 No. 11, September 15, 2004 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Original Contribution
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on ISI (180)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related letters
 •Related article
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Topic Collections
 •Oncology
 •Breast Cancer
 •Magnetic Resonance Imaging
 •Mammography
 •Ultrasonography
 •Alert me on articles by topic

Surveillance of BRCA1 and BRCA2 Mutation Carriers With Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Ultrasound, Mammography, and Clinical Breast Examination

Ellen Warner, MD; Donald B. Plewes, PhD; Kimberley A. Hill, BA; Petrina A. Causer, MD; Judit T. Zubovits, MD; Roberta A. Jong, MD; Margaret R. Cutrara, RN; Gerrit DeBoer, PhD; Martin J. Yaffe, PhD; Sandra J. Messner, MD; Wendy S. Meschino, MD; Cameron A. Piron, MSc; Steven A. Narod, MD

JAMA. 2004;292:1317-1325.

Context  Current recommendations for women who have a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation are to undergo breast surveillance from age 25 years onward with mammography annually and clinical breast examination (CBE) every 6 months; however, many tumors are detected at a relatively advanced stage. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and ultrasound may improve the ability to detect breast cancer at an early stage.

Objective  To compare the sensitivity and specificity of 4 methods of breast cancer surveillance (mammography, ultrasound, MRI, and CBE) in women with hereditary susceptibility to breast cancer due to a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation.

Design, Setting, and Participants  A surveillance study of 236 Canadian women aged 25 to 65 years with BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations who underwent 1 to 3 annual screening examinations, consisting of MRI, mammography, and ultrasound at a single tertiary care teaching hospital between November 3, 1997, and March 31, 2003. On the day of imaging and at 6-month intervals, CBE was performed.

Main Outcome Measures  Sensitivity and specificity of each of the 4 surveillance modalities, and sensitivity of all 4 screening modalities vs mammography and CBE.

Results  Each imaging modality was read independently by a radiologist and scored on a 5-point Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System scale. All lesions with a score of 4 or 5 (suspicious or highly suspicious for malignancy) were biopsied. There were 22 cancers detected (16 invasive and 6 ductal carcinoma in situ). Of these, 17 (77%) were detected by MRI vs 8 (36%) by mammography, 7 (33%) by ultrasound, and 2 (9.1%) by CBE. The sensitivity and specificity (based on biopsy rates) were 77% and 95.4% for MRI, 36% and 99.8% for mammography, 33% and 96% for ultrasound, and 9.1% and 99.3% for CBE, respectively. There was 1 interval cancer. All 4 screening modalities combined had a sensitivity of 95% vs 45% for mammography and CBE combined.

Conclusions  In BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers, MRI is more sensitive for detecting breast cancers than mammography, ultrasound, or CBE alone. Whether surveillance regimens that include MRI will reduce mortality from breast cancer in high-risk women requires further investigation.


Author Affiliations: Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine (Dr Warner and Mss Hill and Cutrara), Imaging Research and Department of Medical Biophysics (Drs Plewes, DeBoer, and Yaffe, and Mr Piron), Department of Medical Imaging (Drs Causer and Jong), Department of Pathology (Dr Zubovits), Division of Clinical Trials and Epidemiology (Dr DeBoer), Departments of Preventive Oncology and Family and Community Medicine (Dr Messner), and Center for Research in Women's Health (Dr Narod), Sunnybrook and Women's College Health Sciences Centre and University of Toronto; and Department of Genetics, North York General Hospital (Dr Meschino), Toronto, Ontario.


RELATED LETTERS

Surveillance of BRCA1 and BRCA2 Carriers
Mark Helvie
JAMA. 2005;293(8):931.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Surveillance of BRCA1 and BRCA2 Carriers—Reply
Ellen Warner, Roberta Jong, Donald Plewes, Martin Yaffe, and Steven Narod
JAMA. 2005;293(8):931.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

RELATED ARTICLE

Breast MRI for Women With Hereditary Cancer Risk
Mark E. Robson and Kenneth Offit
JAMA. 2004;292(11):1368-1370.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Preliminary In Vivo Validation of a Dedicated Breast MRI and Sonographic Coregistration Imaging System
Causer et al.
Am. J. Roentgenol. 2008;191:1203-1207.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Screening for Recurrences in Patients Treated with Breast-Conserving Surgery: Is there a Role for MRI?
Gorechlad et al.
Ann. Surg. Oncol. 2008;15:1703-1709.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Combined Screening With Ultrasound and Mammography vs Mammography Alone in Women at Elevated Risk of Breast Cancer
Berg et al.
JAMA 2008;299:2151-2163.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The "Coming of Age" of Nonmammographic Screening for Breast Cancer
Kuhl
JAMA 2008;299:2203-2205.
FULL TEXT  

Systematic Review: Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging to Screen Women at High Risk for Breast Cancer
Warner et al.
ANN INTERN MED 2008;148:671-679.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

BRCA Screening
Obstet Gynecol 2008;111:1205-1206.
FULL TEXT  

The impact of a false-positive MRI on the choice for mastectomy in BRCA mutation carriers is limited
Hoogerbrugge et al.
Ann Oncol 2008;19:655-659.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Is Mammography Adequate for Screening Women with Inherited BRCA Mutations and Low Breast Density?
Bigenwald et al.
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev. 2008;17:706-711.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Breast Cancer Screening in BRCA1 Mutation Carriers: Effectiveness of MR Imaging--Markov Monte Carlo Decision Analysis
Lee et al.
Radiology 2008;246:763-771.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Cancer surveillance based on imaging techniques in carriers of BRCA1/2 gene mutations: a systematic review
BERMEJO-PEREZ et al.
Br. J. Radiol. 2008;81:172-179.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Who Should Have Breast Magnetic Resonance Imaging Evaluation?
Orel
JCO 2008;26:703-711.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

MRI Screening in a Clinic Population with a Family History of Breast Cancer
Yu et al.
Ann. Surg. Oncol. 2008;15:452-461.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Relationship of Breast Magnetic Resonance Imaging to Outcome After Breast-Conservation Treatment With Radiation for Women With Early-Stage Invasive Breast Carcinoma or Ductal Carcinoma in Situ
Solin et al.
JCO 2008;26:386-391.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Increased Uptake of BRCA1/2 Genetic Testing Among African American Women With a Recent Diagnosis of Breast Cancer
Susswein et al.
JCO 2008;26:32-36.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Screening mammography for young women treated with supradiaphragmatic radiation for Hodgkin's lymphoma
Lee et al.
Ann Oncol 2008;19:62-67.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Mammographic, US, and MR Imaging Phenotypes of Familial Breast Cancer
Schrading and Kuhl
Radiology 2008;246:58-70.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Genetic Testing in Diverse Populations: Are Researchers Doing Enough to Get Out the Correct Message?
Huo and Olopade
JAMA 2007;298:2910-2911.
FULL TEXT  

BRCA1 Mutation and Young Age Predict Fast Breast Cancer Growth in the Dutch, United Kingdom, and Canadian Magnetic Resonance Imaging Screening Trials
Tilanus-Linthorst et al.
Clin. Cancer Res. 2007;13:7357-7362.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Case 32-2007 -- A 62-Year-Old Woman with a Second Breast Cancer
Winer et al.
NEJM 2007;357:1640-1648.
FULL TEXT  

Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Breast Improves Detection of Invasive Cancer, Preinvasive Cancer, and Premalignant Lesions during Surveillance of Women at High Risk for Breast Cancer
Riedl et al.
Clin. Cancer Res. 2007;13:6144-6152.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Breast Cancers Detected with Imaging Screening in the BRCA Population: Emphasis on MR Imaging with Histopathologic Correlation
Causer et al.
RadioGraphics 2007;27:S165-S182.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Current Status of Breast MR Imaging * Part 2. Clinical Applications
Kuhl
Radiology 2007;244:672-691.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Cancer Yield of Mammography, MR, and US in High-Risk Women: Prospective Multi-Institution Breast Cancer Screening Study
Lehman et al.
Radiology 2007;244:381-388.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

BRCA Mutations in Women with Ductal Carcinoma In situ
Smith et al.
Clin. Cancer Res. 2007;13:4306-4310.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Management of an Inherited Predisposition to Breast Cancer
Robson and Offit
NEJM 2007;357:154-162.
FULL TEXT  

Breast MR Imaging: Computer-aided Evaluation Program for Discriminating Benign from Malignant Lesions
Williams et al.
Radiology 2007;244:94-103.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Limited Family Structure and BRCA Gene Mutation Status in Single Cases of Breast Cancer
Weitzel et al.
JAMA 2007;297:2587-2595.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Sonographic Features of Breast Carcinoma Presenting as Masses in BRCA Gene Mutation Carriers
Mesurolle et al.
J Ultrasound Med 2007;26:817-824.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Electromagnetic Breast Imaging: Results of a Pilot Study in Women with Abnormal Mammograms
Poplack et al.
Radiology 2007;243:350-359.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

American Cancer Society Guidelines for Breast Screening with MRI as an Adjunct to Mammography
Saslow et al.
CA Cancer J Clin 2007;57:75-89.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The Utility of Screening Mammography
JWatch Women's Health 2007;2007:1-1.
FULL TEXT  

Multicenter Comparative Multimodality Surveillance of Women at Genetic-Familial High Risk for Breast Cancer (HIBCRIT Study): Interim Results
Sardanelli et al.
Radiology 2007;242:698-715.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Effects on Breast MRI of Artifacts Caused by Metallic Tissue Marker Clips
Genson et al.
Am. J. Roentgenol. 2007;188:372-376.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Reduced Mammographic Density with Use of a Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Agonist-Based Chemoprevention Regimen in BRCA1 Carriers
Weitzel et al.
Clin. Cancer Res. 2007;13:654-658.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Breast Ultrasound
ODLE
radtech 2007;78:222M-242M.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Cost-effectiveness of Breast Magnetic Resonance Imaging to Screen BRCA1/2 Mutation Carriers
Crystal
JAMA 2006;296:2681-2682.
FULL TEXT  

Cost-effectiveness of Breast Magnetic Resonance Imaging to Screen BRCA1/2 Mutation Carriers--Reply
Plevritis et al.
JAMA 2006;296:2682-2682.
FULL TEXT  

Breast MR
ODLE
radtech 2006;78:45M-66M.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Breast Cancer Diagnosis in Women <= 40 versus 50 to 60 Years: Increasing Size and Stage Disparity Compared With Older Women Over Time
Zabicki et al.
Ann. Surg. Oncol. 2006;13:1072-1077.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

MR Imaging-guided Breast Localization System with Medial or Lateral Access
Causer et al.
Radiology 2006;240:369-379.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The Case for Individualized Screening Recommendations for Breast Cancer
Bradbury and Olopade
JCO 2006;24:3328-3330.
FULL TEXT  

A new automated software system to evaluate breast MR examinations: improved specificity without decreased sensitivity.
Lehman et al.
Am. J. Roentgenol. 2006;187:51-56.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Cost-effectiveness of screening BRCA1/2 mutation carriers with breast magnetic resonance imaging.
Plevritis et al.
JAMA 2006;295:2374-2384.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Deliberate Deceit of Family Members: A Challenge to Providers of Clinical Genetics Services
Loud et al.
JCO 2006;24:1643-1646.
FULL TEXT  

Genetic Testing for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer: Responsibility and Choice
d'Agincourt-Canning
Qual Health Res 2006;16:97-118.
ABSTRACT  

Update in Women's Health
Crandall and Pregler
ANN INTERN MED 2005;143:823-829.
FULL TEXT  

Mammography, Breast Ultrasound, and Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Surveillance of Women at High Familial Risk for Breast Cancer
Kuhl et al.
JCO 2005;23:8469-8476.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Current Role of Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Breast Imaging: A Primer for the Primary Care Physician
Shah et al.
J Am Board Fam Med 2005;18:478-490.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Surgical Management of BRCA1 and BRCA2 Carriers: Bitter Choices Slightly Sweetened
Rubinstein
JCO 2005;23:7772-7774.
FULL TEXT  

Cumulative Absolute Breast Cancer Risk for Young Women Treated for Hodgkin Lymphoma
Travis et al.
JNCI J Natl Cancer Inst 2005;97:1428-1437.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Genetic Risk Assessment and BRCA Mutation Testing for Breast and Ovarian Cancer Susceptibility: Recommendation Statement
U.S. Preventive Services Task Force*
ANN INTERN MED 2005;143:355-361.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Genetic Risk Assessment and BRCA Mutation Testing for Breast and Ovarian Cancer Susceptibility: Systematic Evidence Review for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force
Nelson et al.
ANN INTERN MED 2005;143:362-379.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Reading Protocol for Dynamic Contrast-enhanced MR Images of the Breast: Sensitivity and Specificity Analysis
Warren et al.
Radiology 2005;236:779-788.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Should women at high risk of breast cancer be screened with MRI?
Choi
CMAJ 2005;173:32-32.
FULL TEXT  

Ductal Lavage of Fluid-Yielding and Non-Fluid-Yielding Ducts in BRCA1 and BRCA2 Mutation Carriers and Other Women at High Inherited Breast Cancer Risk
Kurian et al.
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev. 2005;14:1082-1089.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Electrical Impedance Scanning for the Early Detection of Breast Cancer in Young Women: Preliminary Results of a Multicenter Prospective Clinical Trial
Stojadinovic et al.
JCO 2005;23:2703-2715.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Prevention and Management of Hereditary Breast Cancer
Narod and Offit
JCO 2005;23:1656-1663.
FULL TEXT  

Future Directions in Breast Imaging
Koomen et al.
JCO 2005;23:1674-1677.
FULL TEXT  

Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Breast: Opportunities to Improve Breast Cancer Management
Hylton
JCO 2005;23:1678-1684.
FULL TEXT  

Screening for Breast Cancer
Elmore et al.
JAMA 2005;293:1245-1256.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Surveillance of BRCA1 and BRCA2 Carriers
Helvie
JAMA 2005;293:931-931.
FULL TEXT  

Functional and genomic approaches reveal an ancient CHEK2 allele associated with breast cancer in the Ashkenazi Jewish population
Shaag et al.
Hum Mol Genet 2005;14:555-563.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Hereditary Cancer Predisposition Syndromes
Garber and Offit
JCO 2005;23:276-292.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

American Cancer Society Guidelines for the Early Detection of Cancer, 2005
Smith et al.
CA Cancer J Clin 2005;55:31-44.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Breast Cancer: One Step Forward, Two Steps Back?
Morrow
JAMA 2004;292:2779-2780.
FULL TEXT  

More Support for Breast MRI in High-Risk Women
JWatch Women's Health 2004;2004:5-5.
FULL TEXT  

Screening BRCA Carriers for Breast Cancer
JWatch General 2004;2004:1-1.
FULL TEXT  

Breast MRI for Women With Hereditary Cancer Risk
Robson and Offit
JAMA 2004;292:1368-1370.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2004 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.