You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 292 No. 11, September 15, 2004 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Health Law and Ethics
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (12)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Topic Collections
 •Medical Practice
 •Health Policy
 •Medical Ethics
 •Neurology
 •Dementias
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Addressing the Ethical, Legal, and Social Issues Raised by Voting by Persons With Dementia

Jason H. Karlawish, MD; Richard J. Bonnie, JD; Paul S. Appelbaum, MD; Constantine Lyketsos, MD; Bryan James, MBioethics; David Knopman, MD; Christopher Patusky, JD; Rosalie A. Kane, PhD; Pamela S. Karlan, JD

JAMA. 2004;292:1345-1350.

This article addresses an emerging policy problem in the United States participation in the electoral process by citizens with dementia. At present, health care professionals, family caregivers, and long-term care staff lack adequate guidance to decide whether individuals with dementia should be precluded from or assisted in casting a ballot. Voting by persons with dementia raises a series of important questions about the autonomy of individuals with dementia, the integrity of the electoral process, and the prevention of fraud. Three subsidiary issues warrant special attention: development of a method to assess capacity to vote; identification of appropriate kinds of assistance to enable persons with cognitive impairment to vote; and formulation of uniform and workable policies for voting in long-term care settings. In some instances, extrapolation from existing policies and research permits reasonable recommendations to guide policy and practice. However, in other instances, additional research is necessary.


Author Affiliations: Department of Medicine, Center for Bioethics (Dr Karlawish), Department of Medicine (Mr James), and Fels Institute of Government (Mr Patusky), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia (Dr Karlawish); Schools of Law and Medicine and Institute of Law, Psychiatry and Public Policy, University of Virginia, Charlottesville (Mr Bonnie); Department of Psychiatry, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester (Dr Appelbaum); Division of Geriatric Psychiatry and Neuropsychiatry, Department of Psychiatry, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Md (Dr Lyketsos); Alzheimer's Disease Research Center, Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn (Dr Knopman); Long-term Care Resources Center, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis (Dr Kane); and Stanford University School of Law, Stanford, Calif (Ms Karlan).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

The Vote of Acute Medical Inpatients: A Prospective Study
Bosquet et al.
J Aging Health 2009;21:699-712.
ABSTRACT  

The Capacity to Vote of Persons With Serious Mental Illness
Raad et al.
Psychiatr. Serv. 2009;60:624-628.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The Capacity to Vote of Persons With Alzheimer's Disease
Appelbaum et al.
Am. J. Psychiatry 2005;162:2094-2100.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2004 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.