You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 292 No. 16, October 27, 2004 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Special Communication
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on ISI (1)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related articles
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Topic Collections
 •Caring for the Uninsured and Underinsured
 •Health Policy
 •Law and Medicine
 •Alert me on articles by topic

10 Years Beyond the Health Security Act Failure

Subsequent Developments and Persistent Problems

Peter P. Budetti, MD, JD

JAMA. 2004;292:2000-2006.

Ten years after the failure of President Clinton’s Health Security Act (HSA), the United States continues to face multiple stresses in health care, including large numbers of uninsured individuals, increasing costs, questions about quality, and dissatisfaction with managed care. Using the framework of the HSA—particularly universal coverage, spending and managed competition, insurance for low-income persons, and patients’ rights—the post-HSA evolution and current status of the US health care system is traced and lessons to guide future actions are outlined. Neither incremental legislation nor private sector changes in health care organization and financing during the past decade have ameliorated the problems addressed by the HSA, and new troubles have emerged. These problems affect every group in the country and continue to deteriorate health care, yet there has been no political support for large-scale reform. The core components of a vision for future action—universal coverage, quality improvement, cost containment, and subsidies for the economically vulnerable—are essential. There is a pressing need to construct a clear vision that would tie together incremental steps into a rational approach to comprehensive reform and to actually move toward the realization of that vision.


Author Affiliations: Edward E. and Helen T. Bartlett Foundation Chair in Public Health, Department of Health Administration and Policy, College of Public Health, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City.

Corresponding Author: Peter P. Budetti, MD, JD, Department of Health Administration and Policy, College of Public Health, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, 801 NE 13th St, CHB 343A, Oklahoma City, OK 73104-5072 (peter-budetti{at}ouhsc.edu).


RELATED ARTICLES

Ensuring Access to Health Care: The Kerry Plan
John Kerry
JAMA. 2004;292(16):2007-2009.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Ensuring Access to Health Care: The Bush Plan
George W. Bush
JAMA. 2004;292(16):2010-2011.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Do We Really Want Broad Access to Health Care?
Mongan and Lee
NEJM 2005;352:1260-1263.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2004 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.