 |
|
Effect of a Computer-Based Decision Aid on Knowledge, Perceptions, and Intentions About Genetic Testing for Breast Cancer Susceptibility
A Randomized Controlled Trial
Michael J. Green, MD, MS;
Susan K. Peterson, PhD, MPH;
Maria Wagner Baker, PhD;
Gregory R. Harper, MD, PhD;
Lois C. Friedman, PhD;
Wendy S. Rubinstein, MD, PhD;
David T. Mauger, PhD
JAMA. 2004;292:442-452.
Context As the availability of and demand for genetic testing for hereditary cancers increases in primary care and other clinical settings, alternative or adjunct educational methods to traditional genetic counseling will be needed.
Objective To compare the effectiveness of a computer-based decision aid with standard genetic counseling for educating women about BRCA1 and BRCA2 genetic testing.
Design Randomized controlled trial conducted from May 2000 to September 2002.
Setting and Participants Outpatient clinics offering cancer genetic counseling at 6 US medical centers enrolled 211 women with personal or family histories of breast cancer.
Interventions Standard one-on-one genetic counseling (n = 105) or education by a computer program followed by genetic counseling (n = 106).
Main Outcome Measures Participants' knowledge, risk perception, intention to undergo genetic testing, decisional conflict, satisfaction with decision, anxiety, and satisfaction with the intervention. Counselor group measures were administered at baseline and after counseling. Computer group measures were administered at baseline, after computer use, and after counseling. Testing decisions were assessed at 1 and 6 months. Outcomes were analyzed by high vs low risk of carrying a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation.
Results Both groups had comparable demographics, prior computer experience, medical literacy, and baseline knowledge of breast cancer and genetic testing, and both counseling and computer use were rated highly. Knowledge scores increased in both groups (P<.001) regardless of risk status, and change in knowledge was greater in the computer group compared with the counselor group (P = .03) among women at low risk of carrying a mutation. Perception of absolute risk of breast cancer decreased significantly after either intervention among all participants. Intention to undergo testing decreased significantly after either intervention among low-risk but not high-risk women. The counselor group had lower mean scores on a decisional conflict scale (P = .04) and, in low-risk women, higher mean scores on a satisfaction-with-decision scale (P = .001). Mean state anxiety scores were reduced by counseling but were within normal ranges for both groups at baseline and after either intervention, regardless of risk status.
Conclusions An interactive computer program was more effective than standard genetic counseling for increasing knowledge of breast cancer and genetic testing among women at low risk of carrying a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation. However, genetic counseling was more effective than the computer at reducing women's anxiety and facilitating more accurate risk perceptions. These results suggest that this computer program has the potential to stand alone as an educational intervention for low-risk women but should be used as a supplement to genetic counseling for those at high risk.
Author Affiliations: Penn State College of Medicine (Drs Green and Mauger) and Penn State Cancer Institute, the Milton S. Hershey Medical Center (Dr Baker), Hershey, Pa; The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston (Dr Peterson); Penn State Cancer Institute, Lehigh Valley Hospital, Allentown, Pa (Dr Harper); Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Tex (Dr Friedman); and Evanston Northwestern Healthcare, Evanston, Ill (Dr Rubinstein).
 CiteULike  Connotea  Del.icio.us  Digg  Reddit  Technorati  Twitter
What's this?
RELATED ARTICLES
Effect of a Decision Aid on Knowledge and Treatment Decision Making for Breast Cancer Surgery: A Randomized Trial
Timothy Whelan, Mark Levine, Andrew Willan, Amiram Gafni, Ken Sanders, Doug Mirsky, Shelley Chambers, Mary Ann O'Brien, Susan Reid, and Sacha Dubois
JAMA. 2004;292(4):435-441.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Decision Aids From Genetics to Treatment of Breast Cancer: Long-term Clinical Utility or Temporary Solution?
Charis Eng and Dirk Iglehart
JAMA. 2004;292(4):496-498.
EXTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Genetics and Breast Cancer
Sharon Parmet, Cassio Lynm, and Richard M. Glass
JAMA. 2004;292(4):522.
EXTRACT
| FULL TEXT
THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES
|
Risk Information Exposure and Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing for BRCA Mutations among Women with a Personal or Family History of Breast or Ovarian Cancer
Gray et al.
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev. 2009;18:1303-1311.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Anchoring-and-Adjustment Bias in Communication of Disease Risk
Senay and Kaphingst
Med Decis Making 2009;29:193-201.
ABSTRACT
Are Cancer-Related Decision Aids Effective? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
O'Brien et al.
JCO 2009;27:974-985.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Literacy and health literacy as defined in cancer education research: A systematic review
Friedman and Hoffman-Goetz
Health Education Journal 2008;67:285-304.
ABSTRACT
Too Many Referrals of Low-Risk Women for BRCA1/2 Genetic Services by Family Physicians
White et al.
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev. 2008;17:2980-2986.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Decision Making in Oncology: A Review of Patient Decision Aids to Support Patient Participation
Stacey et al.
CA Cancer J Clin 2008;58:293-304.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Do Patient Decision Aids Meet Effectiveness Criteria of the International Patient Decision Aid Standards Collaboration? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
O'Connor et al.
Med Decis Making 2007;27:554-574.
ABSTRACT
Rethinking the Objectives of Decision Aids: A Call for Conceptual Clarity
Nelson et al.
Med Decis Making 2007;27:609-618.
ABSTRACT
Using a Computer Kiosk to Promote Child Safety: Results of a Randomized, Controlled Trial in an Urban Pediatric Emergency Department
Gielen et al.
Pediatrics 2007;120:330-339.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Decision Aids and Breast Cancer: Do They Influence Choice for Surgery and Knowledge of Treatment Options?
Waljee et al.
JCO 2007;25:1067-1073.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Individualized Survival Curves Improve Satisfaction With Cancer Risk Management Decisions in Women With BRCA1/2 Mutations
Armstrong et al.
JCO 2005;23:9319-9328.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
The Role of Health Education and Behavior in Public Health Genetics
Kardia and Wang
Health Educ Behav 2005;32:583-588.
ABSTRACT
Enhanced Counseling for Women Undergoing BRCA1/2 Testing: Impact on Subsequent Decision Making About Risk Reduction Behaviors
Miller et al.
Health Educ Behav 2005;32:654-667.
ABSTRACT
Genetic Risk Assessment and BRCA Mutation Testing for Breast and Ovarian Cancer Susceptibility: Systematic Evidence Review for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force
Nelson et al.
ANN INTERN MED 2005;143:362-379.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Aids to Guide Patients with Breast Cancer Decisions
JWatch Women's Health 2004;2004:6-6.
FULL TEXT
Decision Aids From Genetics to Treatment of Breast Cancer: Long-term Clinical Utility or Temporary Solution?
Eng and Iglehart
JAMA 2004;292:496-498.
FULL TEXT
|
