You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 292 No. 8, August 25, 2004 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Brief Report
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on ISI (2)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Topic Collections
 •Randomized Controlled Trial
 •Pediatrics
 •Child Development
 •Primary Care/ Family Medicine
 •Alert me on articles by topic

Effect of a Clinic-Based Referral System to Head Start

A Randomized Controlled Trial

Michael Silverstein, MD, MPH; Christopher Mack, MS; Nicole Reavis, MEd; Thomas D. Koepsell, MD, MPH; Gregory S. Gross, EdD; David C. Grossman, MD, MPH

JAMA. 2004;292:968-971.

Context  Early childhood development programs such as Head Start have proven benefits for impoverished children. However, few physicians assist families with enrollment.

Objective  To test if a primary care–based intervention is efficacious in increasing Head Start attendance.

Design, Setting, and Participants  Randomized controlled trial of 246 Head Start–eligible children aged 0 through 4 years recruited in spring 2003 from 4 health clinics in Seattle, Wash.

Interventions  List of Head Start telephone contacts provided to families of all children and, for those in the intervention group, a computer-generated packet containing a physician referral letter (and a physical examination form and immunization record, if available) mailed directly to Head Start by study personnel.

Main Outcome Measure  Head Start attendance by January 2004.

Results  The 123 children analyzed in each study group were similar at baseline. Overall, 72 children (29%) were successfully connected with Head Start (ie, actively attending or on a waiting list) by January 2004. Among the intervention group, 50 children (41%) were successfully connected with Head Start, contrasted with 22 (18%) in the control group (adjusted difference, 17%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 8%-27%). Among the intervention group, 31 children (25%) were actively attending Head Start, contrasted with 14 (11%) in the control group (adjusted difference, 12%; 95% CI, 3%-21%). Only 2 clinics contributed children to Head Start waiting lists. Among children from these clinics, 19 of 87 (22%) in the intervention group got onto a Head Start waiting list, vs 8 of 94 (9%) in the control group (adjusted difference, 13%; 95% CI, 5%-21%). To get 1 child either into Head Start or onto a waiting list, we needed to refer 4 children.

Conclusion  Facilitating an initial connection to Head Start on families' behalf substantially increased Head Start attendance.


Author Affiliations: Department of Pediatrics, Boston Medical Center, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Mass (Dr Silverstein); Robert Wood Johnson Clinical Scholars Program (Drs Silverstein, Koepsell, and Grossman), Harborview Medical Center (Mr Mack and Dr Grossman), and Departments of Pediatrics (Ms Reavis and Dr Grossman) and Epidemiology (Dr Koepsell), University of Washington, Seattle; Dr Gross is an independent consultant in Jacksonville, Fla.



THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Revisiting the Social History for Child Health
Kenyon et al.
Pediatrics 2007;120:e734-e738.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2004 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.