This Article  • Full text  • PDF  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Citation map  • Citing articles on HighWire  • Citing articles on ISI (87)  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Related letters  • Similar articles in JAMA  Topic Collections  • Medical Practice  • Medical Practice, Other  • Quality of Care  • Quality of Care, Other  • Prognosis/ Outcomes  • Alert me on articles by topic  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

Rachel M. Werner, MD, PhD; David A. Asch, MD, MBA

JAMA. 2005;293:1239-1244.

Health care report cards publicly report information about physician, hospital, and health plan quality in an attempt to improve that quality. Reporting quality information publicly is presumed to motivate quality improvement through 2 main mechanisms. First, public quality information allows patients, referring physicians, and health care purchasers to preferentially select high-quality physicians. Second, public report cards may motivate physicians to compete on quality and, by providing feedback and by identifying areas for quality improvement initiatives, help physicians to do so. Despite these plausible mechanisms of quality improvement, the value of publicly reporting quality information is largely undemonstrated and public reporting may have unintended and negative consequences on health care. These unintended consequences include causing physicians to avoid sick patients in an attempt to improve their quality ranking, encouraging physicians to achieve "target rates" for health care interventions even when it may be inappropriate among some patients, and discounting patient preferences and clinical judgment. Public reporting of quality information promotes a spirit of openness that may be valuable for enhancing trust of the health professions, but its ability to improve health remains undemonstrated, and public reporting may inadvertently reduce, rather than improve, quality. Given these limitations, it may be necessary to reassess the role of public quality reporting in quality improvement.

Author Affiliations: Center for Health Equity Research and Promotion, Philadelphia Veterans Affairs Medical Center; Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics, University of Pennsylvania; and Division of General Internal Medicine, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia.

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati     What's this?

RELATED LETTERS

Publicly Reporting Quality Information
and
JAMA. ;293():2999-3000.
FULL TEXT  

Publicly Reporting Quality Information--Reply
and
JAMA. ;293():3000-3001.
FULL TEXT  

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Assessment of Pancreatic Cancer Care in the United States Based on Formally Developed Quality Indicators
Bilimoria et al.
JNCI J Natl Cancer Inst 2009;101:848-859.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Improving data quality control in quality improvement projects
Needham et al.
Int J Qual Health Care 2009;21:145-150.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The public health hazards of risk avoidance associated with public reporting of risk-adjusted outcomes in coronary intervention.
Resnic and Welt
J Am Coll Cardiol 2009;53:825-830.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Transformation of Health Care at the Front Line
Conway and Clancy
JAMA 2009;301:763-765.
FULL TEXT  

Motivating Public Use of Physician-Level Performance Data: An Experiment on the Effects of Message and Mode
Ranganathan et al.
Med Care Res Rev 2009;66:68-81.
ABSTRACT  

Physicians' Views on Public Reporting of Hospital Quality Data
Barr et al.
Med Care Res Rev 2008;65:655-673.
ABSTRACT  

Public Reporting of Quality Data for Stroke: Is It Measuring Quality?
Kelly et al.
Stroke 2008;39:3367-3371.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Sex Differences in Hospital Risk-Adjusted Mortality Rates for Medicare Beneficiaries Undergoing CABG Surgery
Culler et al.
Arch Intern Med 2008;168:2317-2322.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Regulation, measurements and incentives. The experience in the US and UK: does context matter?
Hamblin
The Journal of the Royal Society for the Promotion of Health 2008;128:291-298.
ABSTRACT  

Performance indicators in acute myocardial infarction: a proposal for the future assessment of good quality care
Weston
Heart 2008;94:1397-1401.
FULL TEXT  

Value-Driven Health Care: Proceed With Caution
Fink
J Am Board Fam Med 2008;21:458-460.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Does the choice of risk-adjustment model influence the outcome of surgeon-specific mortality analysis? A retrospective analysis of 14 637 patients under 31 surgeons
Grant et al.
Heart 2008;94:1044-1049.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Reductions in Mortality Associated With Intensive Public Reporting of Hospital Outcomes
Hollenbeak et al.
American Journal of Medical Quality 2008;23:279-286.
ABSTRACT  

Improving Care Quality and Reducing Disparities: Physicians' Roles
Clancy
Arch Intern Med 2008;168:1135-1136.
FULL TEXT  

ACCF 2008 Health Policy Statement on Principles for Public Reporting of Physician Performance Data: A Report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Writing Committee to Develop Principles for Public Reporting of Physician Performance Data
Drozda et al.
J Am Coll Cardiol 2008;51:1993-2001.
FULL TEXT  

Comparison of Change in Quality of Care Between Safety-Net and Non-Safety-Net Hospitals
Werner et al.
JAMA 2008;299:2180-2187.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Assessment of the Scientific Soundness of Clinical Performance Measures: A Field Test of the National Committee for Quality Assurance's Colorectal Cancer Screening Measure
Schneider et al.
Arch Intern Med 2008;168:876-882.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

When Things Go Wrong: The Impact of Being a Statistical Outlier in Publicly Reported Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery Mortality Data
Ettinger et al.
American Journal of Medical Quality 2008;23:90-95.
ABSTRACT  

Improving the Quality of Measurement and Evaluation in Quality Improvement Efforts
Pronovost et al.
American Journal of Medical Quality 2008;23:143-146.
 

Obesity Impacts Access to Kidney Transplantation
Segev et al.
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2008;19:349-355.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Systematic Review: The Evidence That Publishing Patient Care Performance Data Improves Quality of Care
Fung et al.
ANN INTERN MED 2008;148:111-123.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Do we know quality epilepsy care when we see it?
Langfitt
Neurology 2007;69:1968-1969.
FULL TEXT  

Pay for Performance, Public Reporting, and Racial Disparities in Health Care: How Are Programs Being Designed?
Chien et al.
Med Care Res Rev 2007;64:283S-304S.
ABSTRACT  

Performance Measures in Neuroradiology
Seidenwurm et al.
Am. J. Neuroradiol. 2007;28:1435-1438.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Mortality as a Measure of Quality: Implications for Palliative and End-of-Life Care
Holloway and Quill
JAMA 2007;298:802-804.
FULL TEXT  

Toward Evidence-Based Policy Making and Standardized Assessment of Health Policy Reform
Wharam and Daniels
JAMA 2007;298:676-679.
FULL TEXT  

Nursing Homes' Response to the Nursing Home Compare Report Card
Mukamel et al.
Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Science 2007;62:S218-S225.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The Inverse Relationship Between Mortality Rates And Performance In The Hospital Quality Alliance Measures
Jha et al.
Health Aff (Millwood) 2007;26:1104-1110.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Relationship between Number of Medical Conditions and Quality of Care
Higashi et al.
NEJM 2007;356:2496-2504.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Has the publication of cardiac surgery outcome data been associated with changes in practice in northwest England: an analysis of 25 730 patients undergoing CABG surgery under 30 surgeons over eight years
Bridgewater et al.
Heart 2007;93:744-748.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Management Patterns in Relation to Risk Stratification Among Patients With Non-ST Elevation Acute Coronary Syndromes
Yan et al.
Arch Intern Med 2007;167:1009-1016.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Will Pay-For-Performance And Quality Reporting Affect Health Care Disparities?
Casalino et al.
Health Aff (Millwood) 2007;26:w405-w414.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Quality Measurement in Adult Cardiac Surgery: Part 1--Conceptual Framework and Measure Selection
Shahian et al.
Ann. Thorac. Surg. 2007;83:S3-S12.
FULL TEXT  

General Internists' Views On Pay-For-Performance And Public Reporting Of Quality Scores: A National Survey
Casalino et al.
Health Aff (Millwood) 2007;26:492-499.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Impact of Self-Reported Patient Characteristics Upon Assessment of Glycemic Control in the Veterans Health Administration
Maney et al.
Diabetes Care 2007;30:245-251.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The moderate success of quality of care improvement efforts: three observations on the situation
Katz-Navon et al.
Int J Qual Health Care 2007;19:4-7.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The challenge of explaining why quality improvement has not done better
Kane and Mosser
Int J Qual Health Care 2007;19:8-10.
FULL TEXT  

Public Reporting and Pay for Performance in Hospital Quality Improvement
Lindenauer et al.
NEJM 2007;356:486-496.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Relationship Between Medicare's Hospital Compare Performance Measures and Mortality Rates
Werner and Bradlow
JAMA 2006;296:2694-2702.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Quality of Care for the Treatment of Acute Medical Conditions in US Hospitals
Landon et al.
Arch Intern Med 2006;166:2511-2517.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Process Measures and Short-term Mortality for Acute Myocardial Infarction
McKalip and Harbaugh
JAMA 2006;296:2557-2557.
FULL TEXT  

Assessing the validity of national quality measures for coronary artery disease using an electronic health record.
Persell et al.
Arch Intern Med 2006;166:2272-2277.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Public Report Cards -- Cardiac Surgery and Beyond
Steinbrook
NEJM 2006;355:1847-1849.
FULL TEXT  

Do Cardiac Surgery Report Cards Reduce Mortality? Assessing the Evidence
Epstein
Med Care Res Rev 2006;63:403-426.
ABSTRACT  

Is a public reporting approach appropriate for nursing home care?
Stevenson
Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law 2006;31:773-810.
ABSTRACT  

Measuring hospital quality: what physicians do? How patients fare? Or both?
Jha
JAMA 2006;296:95-97.
FULL TEXT  

Proposed standards for quality improvement research and publication: one step forward and two steps back.
Pronovost and Wachter
Qual Saf Health Care 2006;15:152-153.
FULL TEXT  

Clinical Decision-Making in Blood Pressure Management of Patients with Diabetes Mellitus: An Oklahoma Physicians Resource/Research Network (OKPRN) Study.
Cotton et al.
J Am Board Fam Med 2006;19:232-239.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Will physician-level measures of clinical performance be used in medical malpractice litigation?
Kesselheim et al.
JAMA 2006;295:1831-1834.
FULL TEXT  

Strategies for improving surgical quality--should payers reward excellence or effort?
Birkmeyer and Birkmeyer
NEJM 2006;354:864-870.
FULL TEXT  

Comparison of Weighted Performance Measurement and Dichotomous Thresholds for Glycemic Control in the Veterans Health Administration
Pogach et al.
Diabetes Care 2006;29:241-246.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Using markets to reform health care
Edwards
BMJ 2005;331:1464-1466.
FULL TEXT  

Control, compare and communicate: designing control charts to summarise efficiently data from multiple quality indicators
Guthrie et al.
Qual Saf Health Care 2005;14:450-454.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Moving beyond Round Pegs and Square Holes: Restructuring Medicare To Improve Chronic Care
Wolff and Boult
ANN INTERN MED 2005;143:439-445.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Publicly Reporting Quality Information
Hannan and Chassin
JAMA 2005;293:2999-3000.
FULL TEXT  

Quality and Quality Improvement in Forensic Mental Health Evaluations
Wettstein
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law 2005;33:158-175.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT