This Article  • Full text  • PDF  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Citation map  • Citing articles on HighWire  • Citing articles on ISI (70)  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Related letters  • Similar articles in JAMA  Topic Collections  • Quality of Care, Other  • Medical Practice, Other  • Prognosis/ Outcomes  • Alert me on articles by topic

Rachel M. Werner, MD, PhD; David A. Asch, MD, MBA

JAMA. 2005;293:1239-1244.

Health care report cards publicly report information about physician, hospital, and health plan quality in an attempt to improve that quality. Reporting quality information publicly is presumed to motivate quality improvement through 2 main mechanisms. First, public quality information allows patients, referring physicians, and health care purchasers to preferentially select high-quality physicians. Second, public report cards may motivate physicians to compete on quality and, by providing feedback and by identifying areas for quality improvement initiatives, help physicians to do so. Despite these plausible mechanisms of quality improvement, the value of publicly reporting quality information is largely undemonstrated and public reporting may have unintended and negative consequences on health care. These unintended consequences include causing physicians to avoid sick patients in an attempt to improve their quality ranking, encouraging physicians to achieve "target rates" for health care interventions even when it may be inappropriate among some patients, and discounting patient preferences and clinical judgment. Public reporting of quality information promotes a spirit of openness that may be valuable for enhancing trust of the health professions, but its ability to improve health remains undemonstrated, and public reporting may inadvertently reduce, rather than improve, quality. Given these limitations, it may be necessary to reassess the role of public quality reporting in quality improvement.

Author Affiliations: Center for Health Equity Research and Promotion, Philadelphia Veterans Affairs Medical Center; Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics, University of Pennsylvania; and Division of General Internal Medicine, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia.

RELATED LETTERS

Publicly Reporting Quality Information
Edward L. Hannan and Mark R. Chassin
JAMA. 2005;293(24):2999-3000.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Publicly Reporting Quality Information—Reply
Rachel M. Werner and David A. Asch
JAMA. 2005;293(24):3000-3001.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

ACCF 2008 Health Policy Statement on Principles for Public Reporting of Physician Performance Data: A Report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Writing Committee to Develop Principles for Public Reporting of Physician Performance Data
Drozda et al.
J Am Coll Cardiol 2008;51:1993-2001.
FULL TEXT  

Comparison of Change in Quality of Care Between Safety-Net and Non-Safety-Net Hospitals
Werner et al.
JAMA 2008;299:2180-2187.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Assessment of the Scientific Soundness of Clinical Performance Measures: A Field Test of the National Committee for Quality Assurance's Colorectal Cancer Screening Measure
Schneider et al.
Arch Intern Med 2008;168:876-882.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

When Things Go Wrong: The Impact of Being a Statistical Outlier in Publicly Reported Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery Mortality Data
Ettinger et al.
American Journal of Medical Quality 2008;23:90-95.
ABSTRACT  

Improving the Quality of Measurement and Evaluation in Quality Improvement Efforts
Pronovost et al.
American Journal of Medical Quality 2008;23:143-146.
 

Obesity Impacts Access to Kidney Transplantation
Segev et al.
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2008;19:349-355.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Systematic Review: The Evidence That Publishing Patient Care Performance Data Improves Quality of Care
Fung et al.
ANN INTERN MED 2008;148:111-123.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Do we know quality epilepsy care when we see it?
Langfitt
Neurology 2007;69:1968-1969.
FULL TEXT  

Pay for Performance, Public Reporting, and Racial Disparities in Health Care: How Are Programs Being Designed?
Chien et al.
Med Care Res Rev 2007;64:283S-304S.
ABSTRACT  

Performance Measures in Neuroradiology
Seidenwurm et al.
Am. J. Neuroradiol. 2007;28:1435-1438.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Mortality as a Measure of Quality: Implications for Palliative and End-of-Life Care
Holloway and Quill
JAMA 2007;298:802-804.
FULL TEXT  

Toward Evidence-Based Policy Making and Standardized Assessment of Health Policy Reform
Wharam and Daniels
JAMA 2007;298:676-679.
FULL TEXT  

Nursing Homes' Response to the Nursing Home Compare Report Card
Mukamel et al.
J. Gerontol. B Psychol. Sci. Soc. Sci. 2007;62:S218-S225.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The Inverse Relationship Between Mortality Rates And Performance In The Hospital Quality Alliance Measures
Jha et al.
Health Aff (Millwood) 2007;26:1104-1110.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Relationship between Number of Medical Conditions and Quality of Care
Higashi et al.
NEJM 2007;356:2496-2504.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Has the publication of cardiac surgery outcome data been associated with changes in practice in northwest England: an analysis of 25 730 patients undergoing CABG surgery under 30 surgeons over eight years
Bridgewater et al.
Heart 2007;93:744-748.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Management Patterns in Relation to Risk Stratification Among Patients With Non-ST Elevation Acute Coronary Syndromes
Yan et al.
Arch Intern Med 2007;167:1009-1016.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Will Pay-For-Performance And Quality Reporting Affect Health Care Disparities?
Casalino et al.
Health Aff (Millwood) 2007;26:w405-w414.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Quality Measurement in Adult Cardiac Surgery: Part 1--Conceptual Framework and Measure Selection
Shahian et al.
Ann. Thorac. Surg. 2007;83:S3-S12.
FULL TEXT  

General Internists' Views On Pay-For-Performance And Public Reporting Of Quality Scores: A National Survey
Casalino et al.
Health Aff (Millwood) 2007;26:492-499.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Impact of Self-Reported Patient Characteristics Upon Assessment of Glycemic Control in the Veterans Health Administration
Maney et al.
Diabetes Care 2007;30:245-251.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The moderate success of quality of care improvement efforts: three observations on the situation
Katz-Navon et al.
Int J Qual Health Care 2007;19:4-7.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The challenge of explaining why quality improvement has not done better
Kane and Mosser
Int J Qual Health Care 2007;19:8-10.
FULL TEXT  

Public Reporting and Pay for Performance in Hospital Quality Improvement
Lindenauer et al.
NEJM 2007;356:486-496.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Relationship Between Medicare's Hospital Compare Performance Measures and Mortality Rates
Werner and Bradlow
JAMA 2006;296:2694-2702.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Quality of Care for the Treatment of Acute Medical Conditions in US Hospitals
Landon et al.
Arch Intern Med 2006;166:2511-2517.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Process Measures and Short-term Mortality for Acute Myocardial Infarction
McKalip and Harbaugh
JAMA 2006;296:2557-2557.
FULL TEXT  

Assessing the validity of national quality measures for coronary artery disease using an electronic health record.
Persell et al.
Arch Intern Med 2006;166:2272-2277.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Public Report Cards -- Cardiac Surgery and Beyond
Steinbrook
NEJM 2006;355:1847-1849.
FULL TEXT  

Do cardiac surgery report cards reduce mortality? Assessing the evidence.
Epstein
Med Care Res Rev 2006;63:403-426.
ABSTRACT  

Is a public reporting approach appropriate for nursing home care?
Stevenson
Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law 2006;31:773-810.
ABSTRACT  

Measuring hospital quality: what physicians do? How patients fare? Or both?
Jha
JAMA 2006;296:95-97.
FULL TEXT  

Proposed standards for quality improvement research and publication: one step forward and two steps back.
Pronovost and Wachter
Qual Saf Health Care 2006;15:152-153.
FULL TEXT  

Clinical Decision-Making in Blood Pressure Management of Patients with Diabetes Mellitus: An Oklahoma Physicians Resource/Research Network (OKPRN) Study.
Cotton et al.
J Am Board Fam Med 2006;19:232-239.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Will physician-level measures of clinical performance be used in medical malpractice litigation?
Kesselheim et al.
JAMA 2006;295:1831-1834.
FULL TEXT  

Strategies for improving surgical quality--should payers reward excellence or effort?
Birkmeyer and Birkmeyer
NEJM 2006;354:864-870.
FULL TEXT  

Comparison of Weighted Performance Measurement and Dichotomous Thresholds for Glycemic Control in the Veterans Health Administration
Pogach et al.
Diabetes Care 2006;29:241-246.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Using markets to reform health care
Edwards
BMJ 2005;331:1464-1466.
FULL TEXT  

Control, compare and communicate: designing control charts to summarise efficiently data from multiple quality indicators
Guthrie et al.
Qual Saf Health Care 2005;14:450-454.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Moving beyond Round Pegs and Square Holes: Restructuring Medicare To Improve Chronic Care
Wolff and Boult
ANN INTERN MED 2005;143:439-445.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Publicly Reporting Quality Information
Hannan and Chassin
JAMA 2005;293:2999-3000.
FULL TEXT  

Quality and Quality Improvement in Forensic Mental Health Evaluations
Wettstein
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law 2005;33:158-175.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT