You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 293 No. 17, May 4, 2005 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Original Contribution
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on ISI (64)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related letters
 •Related article
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Topic Collections
 •Randomized Controlled Trial
 •Cardiovascular Disease/ Myocardial Infarction
 •Alert me on articles by topic

Tirofiban and Sirolimus-Eluting Stent vs Abciximab and Bare-Metal Stent for Acute Myocardial Infarction

A Randomized Trial

Marco Valgimigli, MD; Gianfranco Percoco, MD; Patrizia Malagutti, MD; Gianluca Campo, MD; Fabrizio Ferrari, MD; Dario Barbieri, MD; Giordano Cicchitelli, MD; Eugène P. McFadden, MD, FRCPI; Fabia Merlini, MD; Lucia Ansani, MD; Gabriele Guardigli, MD; Alessandro Bettini, MD; Giovanni Parrinello, PhD; Eric Boersma, PhD; Roberto Ferrari, MD, PhD; for the STRATEGY Investigators

JAMA. 2005;293:2109-2117.

Context  Bare-metal stenting with abciximab pretreatment is currently considered a reasonable reperfusion strategy for acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Sirolimus-eluting stents significantly reduce the need for target-vessel revascularization (TVR) vs bare-metal stents but substantially increase procedural costs. At current European list prices, the use of tirofiban instead of abciximab would absorb the difference in cost between stenting with sirolimus-eluting vs bare-metal stents.

Objective  To evaluate the clinical and angiographic impact of single high-dose bolus tirofiban plus sirolimus-eluting stenting vs abciximab plus bare-metal stenting in patients with STEMI.

Design, Setting, and Patients  Prospective, single-blind, randomized controlled study (Single High Dose Bolus Tirofiban and Sirolimus Eluting Stent vs Abciximab and Bare Metal Stent in Myocardial Infarction [STRATEGY]) of 175 patients (median age, 63 [interquartile range, 55-72] years) presenting to a single referral center in Italy with STEMI or presumed new left bundle-branch block and randomized between March 6, 2003, and April 23, 2004.

Intervention  Single high-dose bolus tirofiban regimen plus sirolimus-eluting stenting (n = 87) vs standard-dose abciximab plus bare-metal stenting (n = 88).

Main Outcome Measures  The primary end point was a composite of death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, stroke, or binary restenosis at 8 months. Secondary outcomes included freedom, at day 30 and month 8, from major cardiac or cerebrovascular adverse events (composite of death, reinfarction, stroke, and repeat TVR).

Results  Cumulatively, 14 of 74 patients (19%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 10%-28%) in the tirofiban plus sirolimus-eluting stent group and 37 of 74 patients (50%; 95% CI, 44%-56%) in the abciximab plus bare-metal stent group reached the primary end point (hazard ratio, 0.33; 95% CI, 0.18-0.60; P<.001 [P<.001 by Fischer exact test]). The cumulative incidence of death, reinfarction, stroke, or TVR was significantly lower in the tirofiban plus sirolimus-eluting stent group (18%) vs the abciximab plus bare-metal stent group (32%) (hazard ratio, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.28-0.92; P = .04), predominantly reflecting a reduction in the need for TVR. Binary restenosis was present in 6 of 67 (9%; 95% CI, 2%-16%) and 24 of 66 (36%; 95% CI, 26%-46%) patients in the tirofiban plus sirolimus-eluting stent and abciximab plus bare-metal stent groups, respectively (P = .002).

Conclusion  Tirofiban-supported sirolimus-eluting stenting of infarcted arteries holds promise for improving outcomes while limiting health care expenditure in patients with myocardial infarction undergoing primary intervention.


Author Affiliations: Chair of Cardiology, University of Ferrara, Italy (Drs Valgimigli, Percoco, Malagutti, Campo, F. Ferrari, Barbieri, Cicchitelli, Merlini, Ansani, Guardigli, and R. Ferrari); Cardiovascular Research Centre, Salvatore Maugeri Foundation, IRCCS Gussago (BS), Italy (Drs Valgimigli, Bettini, and R. Ferrari); Medical Statistics Unit, University of Brescia, Italy (Dr Parrinello); Erasmus Medical Center, Thoraxcenter, Rotterdam, the Netherlands (Drs McFadden and Boersma).


RELATED LETTERS

Tirofiban Plus Sirolimus-Eluting Stent vs Abciximab Plus Bare-Metal Stent
Faizel Osman, Sohail Qaisar, Nadia El Gaylani, and Michael Pitt
JAMA. 2005;294(13):1616-1617.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Tirofiban Plus Sirolimus-Eluting Stent vs Abciximab Plus Bare-Metal Stent
Leonardo De Luca and Gennaro Sardella
JAMA. 2005;294(13):1617.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Tirofiban Plus Sirolimus-Eluting Stent vs Abciximab Plus Bare-Metal Stent—Reply
Marco Valgimigli
JAMA. 2005;294(13):1617-1618.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

RELATED ARTICLE

Drug-Eluting Stents in Acute Myocardial Infarction: Is Science Catching Up With Practice?
Mauricio G. Cohen and E. Magnus Ohman
JAMA. 2005;293(17):2154-2156.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Drug-Eluting or Bare-Metal Stents for Acute Myocardial Infarction
Mauri et al.
NEJM 2008;359:1330-1342.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Drug-Eluting Versus Bare Metal Stents in Patients With ST-Segment-Elevation Myocardial Infarction: Eight-Month Follow-Up in the Drug Elution and Distal Protection in Acute Myocardial Infarction (DEDICATION) Trial
Kelbaek et al.
Circulation 2008;118:1155-1162.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Angioplasty Strategies in ST-Segment-Elevation Myocardial Infarction: Part I: Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
Stone
Circulation 2008;118:538-551.
FULL TEXT  

Comparison of Drug-Eluting Stents Versus Bare-Metal Stents for Treating ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction
Shishehbor et al.
J Am Coll Cardiol Intv 2008;1:227-232.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

An Entropic Perspective of Protein Stability on Surfaces
Knotts et al.
Biophys. J 2008;94:4473-4483.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Comparison of Angioplasty With Infusion of Tirofiban or Abciximab and With Implantation of Sirolimus-Eluting or Uncoated Stents for Acute Myocardial Infarction: The MULTISTRATEGY Randomized Trial
Valgimigli et al.
JAMA 2008;299:1788-1799.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Sirolimus-eluting stents versus bare-metal stents in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: 9-month angiographic and intravascular ultrasound results and 12-month clinical outcome results from the MISSION! Intervention Study.
van der Hoeven et al.
J Am Coll Cardiol 2008;51:618-626.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Myocardial Revascularization with Percutaneous Devices
Wilson and Willerson
Card Surg Adult 2008;3:573-598.
FULL TEXT  

Myocardial Revascularization after Acute Myocardial Infarction
George and Oz
Card Surg Adult 2008;3:669-696.
FULL TEXT  

Meta-analysis of randomized trials on drug-eluting stents vs. bare-metal stents in patients with acute myocardial infarction
Kastrati et al.
Eur Heart J 2007;28:2706-2713.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Drug-Eluting Stent Update 2007: Part III: Technique and Unapproved/Unsettled Indications (Left Main, Bifurcations, Chronic Total Occlusions, Small Vessels and Long Lesions, Saphenous Vein Grafts, Acute Myocardial Infarctions, and Multivessel Disease)
Colombo and Chieffo
Circulation 2007;116:1424-1432.
FULL TEXT  

Angiographic Stent Thrombosis After Routine Use of Drug-Eluting Stents in ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction: The Importance of Thrombus Burden
Sianos et al.
J Am Coll Cardiol 2007;50:573-583.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Drug-Eluting Stents: Is Their Future as Bright as Their Past?
Kastrati and Schomig
J Am Coll Cardiol 2007;50:146-148.
FULL TEXT  

Two-Year Clinical Follow-Up After Sirolimus-Eluting Versus Bare-Metal Stent Implantation Assisted by Systematic Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa Inhibitor Infusion in Patients With Myocardial Infarction: Results From the STRATEGY Study
Valgimigli et al.
J Am Coll Cardiol 2007;50:138-145.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Late and Very Late Thrombosis of Drug-Eluting Stents: Evolving Concepts and Perspectives
Jaffe and Strauss
J Am Coll Cardiol 2007;50:119-127.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Clinical impact of in-stent late loss after drug-eluting coronary stent implantation
Moreno et al.
Eur Heart J 2007;28:1583-1591.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Randomized Trial of Sirolimus-Eluting Stent Versus Bare-Metal Stent in Acute Myocardial Infarction (SESAMI)
Menichelli et al.
J Am Coll Cardiol 2007;49:1924-1930.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Reports of clinical trials should begin and end with up-to-date systematic reviews of other relevant evidence: a status report
Clarke et al.
JRSM 2007;100:187-190.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Analysis of 14 Trials Comparing Sirolimus-Eluting Stents with Bare-Metal Stents
Kastrati et al.
NEJM 2007;356:1030-1039.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Impact of Stable Versus Unstable Coronary Artery Disease on 1-Year Outcome in Elective Patients Undergoing Multivessel Revascularization With Sirolimus-Eluting Stents: A Subanalysis of the ARTS II Trial
Valgimigli et al.
J Am Coll Cardiol 2007;49:431-441.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Primary PCI for Myocardial Infarction with ST-Segment Elevation
Keeley and Hillis
NEJM 2007;356:47-54.
FULL TEXT  

Randomized Double-Blind Comparison of Sirolimus-Eluting Stent Versus Bare-Metal Stent Implantation in Diseased Saphenous Vein Grafts: Six-Month Angiographic, Intravascular Ultrasound, and Clinical Follow-Up of the RRISC Trial
Vermeersch et al.
J Am Coll Cardiol 2006;48:2423-2431.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Drug-eluting stents in primary PCI.
Alfonso et al.
NEJM 2006;355:2483-2484.
FULL TEXT  

Value of Platelet Reactivity in Predicting Response to Treatment and Clinical Outcome in Patients Undergoing Primary Coronary Intervention: Insights Into the STRATEGY Study
Campo et al.
J Am Coll Cardiol 2006;48:2178-2185.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Sirolimus-Eluting versus Uncoated Stents in Acute Myocardial Infarction
Spaulding et al.
NEJM 2006;355:1093-1104.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Paclitaxel-Eluting versus Uncoated Stents in Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
Laarman et al.
NEJM 2006;355:1105-1113.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Drug-Eluting Stents in Acute Myocardial Infarction
Van de Werf
NEJM 2006;355:1169-1170.
FULL TEXT  

Prevalence, Predictors, and Outcomes of Premature Discontinuation of Thienopyridine Therapy After Drug-Eluting Stent Placement: Results From the PREMIER Registry
Spertus et al.
Circulation 2006;113:2803-2809.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The Year in Interventional Cardiology
Dixon et al.
J Am Coll Cardiol 2006;47:1689-1706.
FULL TEXT  

Tirofiban Plus Sirolimus-Eluting Stent vs Abciximab Plus Bare-Metal Stent
Osman et al.
JAMA 2005;294:1616-1617.
FULL TEXT  

Tirofiban Plus Sirolimus-Eluting Stent vs Abciximab Plus Bare-Metal Stent
De Luca and Sardella
JAMA 2005;294:1617-1617.
FULL TEXT  

New and old strategies to afford the liberal use of drug-eluting stents in real-life scenarios
Valgimigli et al.
Eur Heart J Suppl 2005;7:K31-K35.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

To Cath or Not to Cath: That Is No Longer the Question
Bhatt
JAMA 2005;293:2935-2937.
FULL TEXT  

A Low-Cost Strategy for Primary PCI?
Journal Watch Cardiology 2005;2005:2-2.
FULL TEXT  

Drug-Eluting Stents in Acute Myocardial Infarction: Is Science Catching Up With Practice?
Cohen and Ohman
JAMA 2005;293:2154-2156.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2005 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.