You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 293 No. 23, June 15, 2005 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Original Contribution
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (26)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related letters
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Topic Collections
 •Quality of Care
 •Quality of Care, Other
 •Prognosis/ Outcomes
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Do Quality Improvement Organizations Improve the Quality of Hospital Care for Medicare Beneficiaries?

Claire Snyder, PhD; Gerard Anderson, PhD

JAMA. 2005;293:2900-2907.

Context  Quality improvement organizations (QIOs) are charged with improving the quality of medical care for Medicare beneficiaries.

Objective  To explore whether the quality of hospital care for Medicare beneficiaries improves more in hospitals that voluntarily participate with Medicare’s QIOs compared with nonparticipating hospitals.

Design, Setting, and Data  Data from 4 QIOs charged with improving the quality of care in 5 states (Maryland, Nevada, New York, Utah, and Washington) and the District of Columbia were used. Hospitals participate with the QIOs on quality improvement on a voluntary basis. A retrospective study was conducted comparing improvement in the quality of care of patients in hospitals that actively participated with the QIOs vs hospitals that did not. The medical records of approximately 750 Medicare beneficiaries per state in each of 5 clinical areas (atrial fibrillation, acute myocardial infarction, heart failure, pneumonia, and stroke) were abstracted at baseline (1998) and follow-up (2000-2001).

Main Outcome Measure  Fifteen quality indicators associated with improved outcomes in the prevention or treatment of the 5 clinical areas were used as quality of care measures. These 15 indicators were specifically targeted by the QIOs for quality improvement during the study period.

Results  Hospitals that voluntarily participate with the QIOs are more likely to be larger than nonparticipating hospitals (P<.05). At baseline, there were statistically significant (P<.05) differences between participating and nonparticipating hospitals on 5 of 15 quality indicators, with participating hospitals performing better on 3 of 5. There was no statistically significant difference in change from baseline to follow-up between participating and nonparticipating hospitals on 14 of 15 quality indicators. The one exception was that participating hospitals improved more on the pneumonia immunization indicator than nonparticipating hospitals (P = .005).

Conclusion  Hospitals that participate with the QIO program are not more likely to show improvement on quality indicators than hospitals that do not participate.


Author Affiliations: Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Md.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

RELATED LETTERS

Quality Improvement Organizations and the Institute of Medicine
Stephen M. Shortell
JAMA. 2005;294(6):680.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Quality Improvement Organizations and the Institute of Medicine—Reply
Claire Snyder
JAMA. 2005;294(6):680.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Preventable Morbidity at a Mature Trauma Center--Invited Critique
Velmahos
Arch Surg 2009;144:541-542.
FULL TEXT  

Using quality indicators to improve hospital care: a review of the literature
De Vos et al.
Int J Qual Health Care 2009;21:119-129.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

A Statewide Collaborative Initiative to Improve the Quality of Care for Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction and Heart Failure
Brush et al.
Circulation 2009;119:1609-1615.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Health sector accreditation research: a systematic review
Greenfield and Braithwaite
Int J Qual Health Care 2008;20:172-183.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Diabetes Health Disparities: A Systematic Review of Health Care Interventions
Peek et al.
Med Care Res Rev 2007;64:101S-156S.
ABSTRACT  

Assessment of the Medicare Quality Improvement Organization Program
Rollow et al.
ANN INTERN MED 2006;145:342-353.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Is a public reporting approach appropriate for nursing home care?
Stevenson
Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law 2006;31:773-810.
ABSTRACT  

Quality Improvement Organizations and Hospital Care
Jencks
JAMA 2005;294:2028-2028.
FULL TEXT  

Quality Improvement Organizations and Hospital Care
Sugarman and Baumgardner
JAMA 2005;294:2029-2029.
FULL TEXT  

Quality Improvement Organizations and Hospital Care
Bratzler
JAMA 2005;294:2028-2029.
FULL TEXT  

Quality Improvement Organizations and Hospital Care
Gold et al.
JAMA 2005;294:2029-2029.
FULL TEXT  

Quality Improvement Organizations and the Institute of Medicine
Shortell
JAMA 2005;294:680-680.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2005 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.