You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 293 No. 23, June 15, 2005 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Review
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (152)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related letters
 •Related article
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Topic Collections
 •Revascularization
 •Cardiovascular System
 •Quality of Care
 •Evidence-Based Medicine
 •Surgery
 •Surgical Interventions
 •Cardiovascular/ Cardiothoracic Surgery
 •Review
 •Cardiovascular Disease/ Myocardial Infarction
 •Cardiovascular Intervention
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Routine vs Selective Invasive Strategies in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndromes

A Collaborative Meta-analysis of Randomized Trials

Shamir R. Mehta, MD, MSc; Christopher P. Cannon, MD; Keith A. A. Fox, MBCHB; Lars Wallentin, MD; William E. Boden, MD; Rudolf Spacek, MD; Petr Widimsky, MD; Peter A. McCullough, MD, MPH; David Hunt, MD; Eugene Braunwald, MD; Salim Yusuf, MBBS, DPhil

JAMA. 2005;293:2908-2917.

Context  Patients with unstable angina or non–ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) can be cared for with a routine invasive strategy involving coronary angiography and revascularization or more conservatively with a selective invasive strategy in which only those with recurrent or inducible ischemia are referred for acute intervention.

Objective  To conduct a meta-analysis that compares benefits and risks of routine invasive vs selective invasive strategies.

Data Sources  Randomized controlled trials identified through search of MEDLINE and the Cochrane databases (1970 through June 2004) and hand searching of cross-references from original articles and reviews.

Study Selection  Trials were included that involved patients with unstable angina or NSTEMI who received a routine invasive or a selective invasive strategy.

Data Extraction  Major outcomes of death and myocardial infarction (MI) occurring from initial hospitalization to the end of follow-up were extracted from published results of eligible trials.

Data Synthesis  A total of 7 trials (N = 9212 patients) were eligible. Overall, death or MI was reduced from 663 (14.4%) of 4604 patients in the selective invasive group to 561 (12.2%) of 4608 patients in the routine invasive group (odds ratio [OR], 0.82; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.72-0.93; P = .001). There was a nonsignificant trend toward fewer deaths (6.0% vs 5.5%; OR, 0.92; 95% CI, 0.77-1.09; P = .33) and a significant reduction in MI alone (9.4% vs 7.3%; OR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.65-0.88; P<.001). Higher-risk patients with elevated cardiac biomarker levels at baseline benefited more from routine intervention, with no significant benefit observed in lower-risk patients with negative baseline marker levels. During the initial hospitalization, a routine invasive strategy was associated with a significantly higher early mortality (1.1% vs 1.8% for selective vs routine, respectively; OR, 1.60; 95% CI, 1.14-2.25; P = .007) and the composite of death or MI (3.8% vs 5.2%; OR, 1.36; 95% CI, 1.12-1.66; P = .002). But after discharge, the routine invasive strategy was associated with fewer subsequent deaths (4.9% vs 3.8%; OR, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.62-0.94; P = .01) and the composite of death or MI (11.0% vs 7.4%; OR, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.56-0.75; P<.001). At the end of follow-up, there was a 33% reduction in severe angina (14.0% vs 11.2%; OR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.68-0.87; P<.001) and a 34% reduction in rehospitalization (41.3% vs 32.5%; OR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.60-0.72; P<.001) with a routine invasive strategy.

Conclusions  A routine invasive strategy exceeded a selective invasive strategy in reducing MI, severe angina, and rehospitalization over a mean follow-up of 17 months. But routine intervention was associated with a higher early mortality hazard and a trend toward a mortality reduction at follow-up. Future strategies should explore ways to minimize the early hazard and enhance later benefits by focusing on higher-risk patients and optimizing timing of intervention and use of proven therapies.


Author Affiliations: Department of Medicine, McMaster University, and Population Health Research Institute, Hamilton Health Sciences, Hamilton, Ontario (Drs Mehta and Yusuf); TIMI Study Group and Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass (Drs Cannon and Braunwald); Department of Medicine, Royal Infirmary, Edinburgh, Scotland (Dr Fox); Uppsala Clinical Research Center, University Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden (Dr Wallentin); Henry Low Heart Center and Division of Cardiology, Hartford Hospital, Hartford, Conn (Dr Boden); Cardiocenter, University Hospital Kralovske Vinohrady, Third Medical School of Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic (Drs Spacek and Widimsky); William Beaumont Hospital, Royal Oak, Mich (Dr McCullough); and Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Australia (Dr Hunt).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

RELATED LETTERS

Routine vs Selective Invasive Strategies in Acute Coronary Syndromes
Anthony A. Bavry and Dharam J. Kumbhani
JAMA. 2005;294(22):2844-2845.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Routine vs Selective Invasive Strategies in Acute Coronary Syndromes
Enrique V. Carbajal
JAMA. 2005;294(22):2845.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Routine vs Selective Invasive Strategies in Acute Coronary Syndromes—Reply
Shamir R. Mehta and Salim Yusuf
JAMA. 2005;294(22):2845-2846.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

RELATED ARTICLE

To Cath or Not to Cath: That Is No Longer the Question
Deepak L. Bhatt
JAMA. 2005;293(23):2935-2937.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

The Relative Efficacy and Safety of Clopidogrel in Women and Men: A Sex-Specific Collaborative Meta-Analysis
Berger et al.
J Am Coll Cardiol 2009;54:1935-1945.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Delays in angiography may cost lives
Rothman and De Palma
Heart 2009;95:1815-1817.
FULL TEXT  

Immediate vs Delayed Intervention for Acute Coronary Syndromes: A Randomized Clinical Trial
Montalescot et al.
JAMA 2009;302:947-954.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Early Angiography in Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease: A Collaborative Systematic Review
Charytan et al.
CJASN 2009;4:1032-1043.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Early versus Delayed Invasive Intervention in Acute Coronary Syndromes
Mehta et al.
NEJM 2009;360:2165-2175.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Optimal Management of Acute Coronary Syndromes
Hillis and Lange
NEJM 2009;360:2237-2240.
FULL TEXT  

Immediate versus deferred coronary angioplasty in non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes
Riezebos et al.
Heart 2009;95:807-812.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Comparison of Drug-Eluting and Bare-Metal Stents for Stable Coronary Artery Disease
Horst et al.
J Am Coll Cardiol Intv 2009;2:321-328.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Diverging associations of an intended early invasive strategy compared with actual revascularization, and outcome in patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome: the problem of treatment selection bias
Hirsch et al.
Eur Heart J 2009;30:645-654.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Temporal management patterns and outcomes of non-ST elevation acute coronary syndromes in patients with kidney dysfunction
Wong et al.
Eur Heart J 2009;30:549-557.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Treatment disparities in patients with acute coronary syndromes and kidney disease
McCullough
Eur Heart J 2009;30:526-527.
FULL TEXT  

Policy Research: Using Evidence to Improve Healthcare Delivery Systems
Ross and Gross
Circulation 2009;119:891-898.
FULL TEXT  

The Drug-Eluting Stent Saga
Windecker and Juni
Circulation 2009;119:653-656.
FULL TEXT  

Early invasive compared with a selective invasive strategy in women with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes: a substudy of the OASIS 5 trial and a meta-analysis of previous randomized trials
Swahn et al.
Eur Heart J 2009;0:ehp009v1-10.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Review: an early invasive strategy has similar benefits in men and women with NSTEMI or unstable angina
Granger
Evid. Based Med. 2009;14:19-19.
FULL TEXT  

Refining the Art and Science of Coronary Stenting
Ellis
NEJM 2009;360:292-294.
FULL TEXT  

Interpreting troponin elevations: do we need multiple diagnoses?
Pierpont and McFalls
Eur Heart J 2009;30:135-138.
FULL TEXT  

Expanding the Orbit of Primary Prevention -- Moving beyond JUPITER
Hlatky
NEJM 2008;359:2280-2282.
FULL TEXT  

Antiplatelet Therapy Use After Discharge Among Acute Myocardial Infarction Patients With In-Hospital Bleeding
Wang et al.
Circulation 2008;118:2139-2145.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Antithrombotic Therapy With Fondaparinux in Relation to Interventional Management Strategy in Patients With ST- and Non-ST-Segment Elevation Acute Coronary Syndromes: An Individual Patient-Level Combined Analysis of the Fifth and Sixth Organization to Assess Strategies in Ischemic Syndromes (OASIS 5 and 6) Randomized Trials
Mehta et al.
Circulation 2008;118:2038-2046.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Should Percutaneous Revascularization for Stable Coronary Artery Disease Be Performed Sooner or Later?
Prasad and Gersh
J Am Coll Cardiol Intv 2008;1:480-482.
FULL TEXT  

Drug-Eluting or Bare-Metal Stents for Acute Myocardial Infarction
Mauri et al.
NEJM 2008;359:1330-1342.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Stable Coronary Artery Disease
Katritsis and Meier
J Am Coll Cardiol 2008;52:889-893.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Impact of In-Hospital Revascularization on Survival in Patients With Non-ST-Elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome and Congestive Heart Failure
Steg et al.
Circulation 2008;118:1163-1171.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

When Is Better Not Good Enough?: Insights From the COURAGE Economic Study
Kirtane and Cohen
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes 2008;1:4-6.
FULL TEXT  

Cost-Effectiveness of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Optimally Treated Stable Coronary Patients
Weintraub et al.
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes 2008;1:12-20.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Effect of PCI on Quality of Life in Patients with Stable Coronary Disease
Weintraub et al.
NEJM 2008;359:677-687.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Angioplasty Strategies in ST-Segment-Elevation Myocardial Infarction: Part II: Intervention After Fibrinolytic Therapy, Integrated Treatment Recommendations, and Future Directions
Stone
Circulation 2008;118:552-566.
FULL TEXT  

Early Invasive vs Conservative Treatment Strategies in Women and Men With Unstable Angina and Non-ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction: A Meta-analysis
O'Donoghue et al.
JAMA 2008;300:71-80.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The cost-effectiveness of an early interventional strategy in non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome based on the RITA 3 trial
Henriksson et al.
Heart 2008;94:717-723.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Clinical benefit and practical use of fondaparinux in the invasive management of patients with acute coronary syndromes
Mehta
Eur Heart J Suppl 2008;10:C14-C21.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Fitness consequences of personality: a meta-analysis
Smith and Blumstein
Behav Ecol 2008;19:448-455.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Systematic Review: Comparing Routine and Selective Invasive Strategies for the Acute Coronary Syndrome
Qayyum et al.
ANN INTERN MED 2008;148:186-196.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

One-year clinical outcomes with abciximab vs. placebo in patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention after pre-treatment with clopidogrel: results of the ISAR-REACT 2 randomized trial
Ndrepepa et al.
Eur Heart J 2008;29:455-461.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Percutaneous coronary intervention for chronic stable angina a reassessment.
Holmes et al.
J Am Coll Cardiol Intv 2008;1:34-43.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

2007 Focused Update of the ACC/AHA/SCAI 2005 Guideline Update for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
American College of Cardiology/American Heart Asso et al.
J Am Coll Cardiol 2008;51:172-209.
FULL TEXT  

2007 Focused Update of the ACC/AHA/SCAI 2005 Guideline Update for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines: 2007 Writing Group to Review New Evidence and Update the ACC/AHA/SCAI 2005 Guideline Update for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention, Writing on Behalf of the 2005 Writing Committee
King et al.
Circulation 2008;117:261-295.
FULL TEXT  

Predictors of Outcome and the Lack of Effect of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Across the Risk Strata in Patients With Persistent Total Occlusion After Myocardial Infarction. Results From the Occluded Artery Trial (OAT).
Kruk et al.
J Am Coll Cardiol Intv 2008;1:511-520.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Antithrombotic Strategies in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndromes Undergoing Early Invasive Management: One-Year Results From the ACUITY Trial
Stone et al.
JAMA 2007;298:2497-2506.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Time to Coronary Angiography and Outcomes Among Patients With High-Risk Non ST-Segment Elevation Acute Coronary Syndromes: Results From the SYNERGY Trial
Tricoci et al.
Circulation 2007;116:2669-2677.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Sex in the CCU: women with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome may do no worse despite less intervention
Bradshaw and Thompson
Heart 2007;93:1327-1328.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Efficacy and Safety of Fondaparinux Versus Enoxaparin in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndromes Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Results From the OASIS-5 Trial
Mehta et al.
J Am Coll Cardiol 2007;50:1742-1751.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

COURAGE Under Fire: On the Management of Stable Coronary Disease
Diamond and Kaul
J Am Coll Cardiol 2007;50:1604-1609.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The Truth and Consequences of the COURAGE Trial
Kereiakes et al.
J Am Coll Cardiol 2007;50:1598-1603.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Growth Differentiation Factor 15 for Risk Stratification and Selection of an Invasive Treatment Strategy in Non ST-Elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome
Wollert et al.
Circulation 2007;116:1540-1548.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Are acute coronary syndromes risk models too complex? reply
Yan et al.
Eur Heart J 2007;28:2176-2177.
FULL TEXT  

ACC/AHA 2007 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Unstable Angina/Non-ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Revise the 2002 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Unstable Angina/Non-ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction) Developed in Collaboration with the American College of Emergency Physicians, the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and the Society of Thoracic Surgeons Endorsed by the American Association of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Rehabilitation and the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine
Anderson et al.
J Am Coll Cardiol 2007;50:e1-e157.
FULL TEXT  

ACC/AHA 2007 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Unstable Angina/Non ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction Executive Summary: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Revise the 2002 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Unstable Angina/Non ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction) Developed in Collaboration with the American College of Emergency Physicians, the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and the Society of Thoracic Surgeons Endorsed by the American Association of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Rehabilitation and the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine
Anderson et al.
J Am Coll Cardiol 2007;50:652-726.
FULL TEXT  

Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes: The Task Force for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Non-ST-Segment Elevation Acute Coronary Syndromes of the European Society of Cardiology
Authors/Task Force Members et al.
Eur Heart J 2007;28:1598-1660.
FULL TEXT  

Acute coronary syndromes without ST segment elevation
Peters et al.
BMJ 2007;334:1265-1269.
FULL TEXT  

Guidelines on diabetes, pre-diabetes, and cardiovascular diseases: full text: The Task Force on Diabetes and Cardiovascular Diseases of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and of the European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD)
Authors/Task Force Members et al.
Eur Heart J Suppl 2007;9:C3-C74.
FULL TEXT  

Acute Coronary Care in the Elderly, Part I: Non-ST-Segment-Elevation Acute Coronary Syndromes: A Scientific Statement for Healthcare Professionals From the American Heart Association Council on Clinical Cardiology: In Collaboration With the Society of Geriatric Cardiology
Alexander et al.
Circulation 2007;115:2549-2569.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Decline in Rates of Death and Heart Failure in Acute Coronary Syndromes, 1999-2006
Fox et al.
JAMA 2007;297:1892-1900.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Does Preventive PCI Work?
Hochman and Steg
NEJM 2007;356:1572-1574.
FULL TEXT  

Optimal Medical Therapy with or without PCI for Stable Coronary Disease
Boden et al.
NEJM 2007;356:1503-1516.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

A comprehensive view of sex-specific issues related to cardiovascular disease
Pilote et al.
CMAJ 2007;176:S1-S44.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Opening of Specialty Cardiac Hospitals and Use of Coronary Revascularization in Medicare Beneficiaries
Nallamothu et al.
JAMA 2007;297:962-968.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Temporal trends in mortality of patients with diabetes mellitus suffering acute myocardial infarction: a comparison of over 3000 patients between 1995 and 2003
Cubbon et al.
Eur Heart J 2007;28:540-545.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

In Unstable Angina or Non-ST-Segment Acute Coronary Syndrome, Should Patients With Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease Undergo Multivessel or Culprit-Only Stenting?
Shishehbor et al.
J Am Coll Cardiol 2007;49:849-854.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Coronary Heart Disease in Patients With Diabetes: Part II: Recent Advances in Coronary Revascularization
Berry et al.
J Am Coll Cardiol 2007;49:643-656.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Effects of revascularization within 14 days of hospital admission due to acute coronary syndrome on 1-year mortality in patients with previous coronary artery bypass graft surgery
Held et al.
Eur Heart J 2007;28:316-325.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Underuse of revascularisation in acute coronary syndromes
Neumann and Buttner
Heart 2007;93:147-148.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

New aspects in the treatment of acute coronary syndromes without ST-elevation: ICTUS and ISAR-COOL in perspective
Neumann et al.
Eur Heart J Suppl 2007;9:A4-A10.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Intervention in acute coronary syndromes: do patients undergo intervention on the basis of their risk characteristics? The Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events (GRACE)
Fox et al.
Heart 2007;93:177-182.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Analysis of Observational Studies in the Presence of Treatment Selection Bias: Effects of Invasive Cardiac Management on AMI Survival Using Propensity Score and Instrumental Variable Methods
Stukel et al.
JAMA 2007;297:278-285.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Guidelines on diabetes, pre-diabetes, and cardiovascular diseases: executive summary: The Task Force on Diabetes and Cardiovascular Diseases of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and of the European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD)
Authors/Task Force Members et al.
Eur Heart J 2007;28:88-136.
FULL TEXT  

Bivalirudin for Patients with Acute Coronary Syndromes.
Stone et al.
NEJM 2006;355:2203-2216.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The Year in Epidemiology, Health Services Research, and Outcomes Research
Krumholz and Masoudi
J Am Coll Cardiol 2006;48:1886-1895.
FULL TEXT  

MDCT in early triage of patients with acute chest pain.
Hoffmann et al.
Am. J. Roentgenol. 2006;187:1240-1247.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Benefit of Early Invasive Therapy in Acute Coronary Syndromes: A Meta-Analysis of Contemporary Randomized Clinical Trials
Bavry et al.
J Am Coll Cardiol 2006;48:1319-1325.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Clopidogrel in non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes
Mehta
Eur Heart J Suppl 2006;8:G25-G30.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Interventional versus conservative treatment in acute non-ST elevation coronary syndrome: time course of patient management and disease events over one year in the RITA 3 trial
Poole-Wilson et al.
Heart 2006;92:1473-1479.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Commentary on Clinical Guidelines and Practice: In Search of the Truth by Dean J. Kereiakes and Elliott M. Antman
de Winter
J Am Coll Cardiol 2006;48:1136-1138.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Clinical Guidelines and Practice: In Search of the Truth
Kereiakes and Antman
J Am Coll Cardiol 2006;48:1129-1135.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2005 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.