You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 293 No. 5, February 2, 2005 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Original Contribution
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on ISI (30)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related article
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Topic Collections
 •Informatics/ Internet in Medicine
 •Medical Informatics
 •Primary Care/ Family Medicine
 •Quality of Care
 •Quality of Care, Other
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati
What's this?

Missing Clinical Information During Primary Care Visits

Peter C. Smith, MD; Rodrigo Araya-Guerra, BA; Caroline Bublitz, MS; Bennett Parnes, MD; L. Miriam Dickinson, PhD; Rebecca Van Vorst, BA; John M. Westfall, MD, MPH; Wilson D. Pace, MD

JAMA. 2005;293:565-571.

Context  The coordinating function of primary care is information-intensive and may be impeded by missing clinical information. However, missing clinical information has not been explicitly investigated in the primary care setting.

Objective  To describe primary care clinicians’ reports of missing clinical information.

Design, Setting, and Participants  Cross-sectional survey conducted in 32 primary care clinics within State Networks of Colorado Ambulatory Practices and Partners (SNOCAP), a consortium of practice-based research networks participating in the Applied Strategies for Improving Patient Safety medical error reporting study. Two hundred fifty-three clinicians were surveyed about 1614 patient visits between May and December 2003. For every visit during 1 half-day session, each clinician completed a questionnaire about patient and visit characteristics and stated whether important clinical information had been missing. Clinician characteristics were also recorded.

Main Outcome Measures  Reports of missing clinical information frequency, type, and presumed location; perceived likelihood of adverse effects, delays in care, and additional services; and time spent looking for missing information. Multivariate analysis was conducted to assess the relationship of missing information to patient, visit, or clinician characteristics, adjusting for potential confounders and effects of clustering.

Results  Clinicians reported missing clinical information in 13.6% of visits; missing information included laboratory results (6.1% of all visits), letters/dictation (5.4%), radiology results (3.8%), history and physical examination (3.7%), and medications (3.2%). Missing clinical information was frequently reported to be located outside their clinical system but within the United States (52.3%), to be at least somewhat likely to adversely affect patients (44%), and to potentially result in delayed care or additional services (59.5%). Significant time was reportedly spent unsuccessfully searching for missing clinical information (5-10 minutes, 25.6%; >10 minutes, 10.4%). After adjustment, reported missing clinical information was more likely when patients were recent immigrants (odds ratio [OR], 1.78; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.06-2.99), new patients (OR, 2.39; 95% CI, 1.70-3.35), or had multiple medical problems compared with no problems (1 problem: OR, 1.09; 95% CI, 0.69-1.73; 2-5 problems: OR, 1.87; 95% CI, 1.21-2.89; >5 problems: OR, 2.78; 95% CI, 1.61-4.80). Missing clinical information was less likely in rural practices (OR, 0.52; 95% CI, 0.29-0.92) and when individual clinicians reported having full electronic records (OR, 0.40; 95% CI, 0.17-0.94).

Conclusions  Primary care clinicians report that missing clinical information is common, multifaceted, likely to consume time and other resources, and may adversely affect patients. Additional research on missing information is needed to focus on validating clinicians’ perceptions and on conducting prospective studies of its causes and sequelae.


Author Affiliations: Department of Family Medicine, University of Colorado Health Sciences Center, Denver.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLE

Missing Clinical Information: The System Is Down
Nancy C. Elder and John Hickner
JAMA. 2005;293(5):617-619.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Breaking the mould in patient safety
Degos et al.
BMJ 2009;338:b2585-b2585.
FULL TEXT  

Lack of Impact of Direct-to-Consumer Advertising on the Physician-Patient Encounter in Primary Care: A SNOCAP Report
Parnes et al.
Ann Fam Med 2009;7:41-46.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Electronic Results Management in Pediatric Ambulatory Care: Qualitative Assessment
Ferris et al.
Pediatrics 2009;123:S85-S91.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Information exchange among physicians caring for the same patient in the community
van Walraven et al.
CMAJ 2008;179:1013-1018.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Computerized Alerts Improve Outpatient Laboratory Monitoring of Transplant Patients
Staes et al.
J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 2008;15:324-332.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

A theoretical framework and competency-based approach to improving handoffs
Arora et al.
Qual Saf Health Care 2008;17:11-14.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Emergency Physicians' Perceptions of Health Information Exchange
Shapiro et al.
J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 2007;14:700-705.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Another Lesson From Santa Barbara
Holmquest
Health Aff (Millwood) 2007;26:w592-w594.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Electronic Medical Records and Diabetes Quality of Care: Results From a Sample of Family Medicine Practices
Crosson et al.
Ann Fam Med 2007;5:209-215.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Ambulatory care adverse events and preventable adverse events leading to a hospital admission
Woods et al.
Qual Saf Health Care 2007;16:127-131.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Effect of Provider Continuity on Test Repetition
van Walraven et al.
Clin. Chem. 2006;52:2219-2228.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

e-Prescribing, Efficiency, Quality: Lessons from the Computerization of UK Family Practice
Schade et al.
J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 2006;13:470-475.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

It Ain't Necessarily So: The Electronic Health Record And The Unlikely Prospect Of Reducing Health Care Costs.
Sidorov
Health Aff (Millwood) 2006;25:1079-1085.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Adherence to black box warnings for prescription medications in outpatients.
Lasser et al.
Arch Intern Med 2006;166:338-344.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Informatics Challenges for the Impending Patient Information Explosion
Berner and Moss
J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 2005;12:614-617.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Missing Clinical Information: The System Is Down
Elder and Hickner
JAMA 2005;293:617-619.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2005 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.