You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 293 No. 6, February 9, 2005 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Original Contribution
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on ISI (21)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related letters
 •Related articles
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Topic Collections
 •Neurology
 •Cerebrovascular Disease
 •Stroke
 •Arrhythmias
 •Cardiovascular Intervention
 •Thrombolysis
 •Alert me on articles by topic

Costs and Effectiveness of Ximelagatran for Stroke Prophylaxis in Chronic Atrial Fibrillation

Cara L. O’Brien, MD; Brian F. Gage, MD, MSc

JAMA. 2005;293:699-706.

Context  Recent trials have found that ximelagatran and warfarin are equally effective in stroke prevention for patients with atrial fibrillation. Because ximelagatran can be taken in a fixed, oral dose without international normalized ratio monitoring and may have a lower risk of hemorrhage, it might improve quality-adjusted survival compared with dose-adjusted warfarin.

Objective  To compare quality-adjusted survival and cost among 3 alternative therapies for patients with chronic atrial fibrillation: ximelagatran, warfarin, and aspirin.

Design  Semi-Markov decision model.

Patients  Hypothetical cohort of 70-year-old patients with chronic atrial fibrillation, varying risk of stroke, and no contraindications to anticoagulation therapy.

Main Outcome Measures  Quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) and costs in US dollars.

Results  For patients with atrial fibrillation but no additional risk factors for stroke, both ximelagatran and warfarin cost more than $50 000 per QALY compared with aspirin. For patients with additional stroke risk factors and low hemorrhage risk, ximelagatran modestly increased quality-adjusted survival (0.12 QALY) at a substantial cost ($116 000 per QALY) compared with warfarin. For ximelagatran to cost less than $50 000 per QALY it would have to cost less than $1100 per year or be prescribed to patients who have an elevated risk of intracranial hemorrhage (>1.0% per year of warfarin) or a low quality of life with warfarin therapy.

Conclusion  Assuming equal effectiveness in stroke prevention and decreased hemorrhage risk, ximelagatran is not likely to be cost-effective in patients with atrial fibrillation unless they have a high risk of intracranial hemorrhage or a low quality of life with warfarin.


Author Affiliations: Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Mo.


RELATED LETTERS

Cost-effectiveness of Ximelagatran for Stroke Prevention
Christine Perret-Guillaume and Denis Wahl
JAMA. 2005;293(23):2860-2861.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Cost-effectiveness of Ximelagatran for Stroke Prevention—Reply
Cara L. O’Brien and Brian F. Gage
JAMA. 2005;293(23):2861.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

RELATED ARTICLES

Ximelagatran vs Low-Molecular-Weight Heparin and Warfarin for the Treatment of Deep Vein Thrombosis: A Randomized Trial
Jean-Noel Fiessinger, Menno V. Huisman, Bruce L. Davidson, Henri Bounameaux, Charles W. Francis, Henry Eriksson, Torbjörn Lundström, Scott D. Berkowitz, Per Nyström, Mona Thorsén, Jeffrey S. Ginsberg, and for the THRIVE Treatment Study Investigators
JAMA. 2005;293(6):681-689.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Ximelagatran vs Warfarin for Stroke Prevention in Patients With Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation: A Randomized Trial
SPORTIF Executive Steering Committee for the SPORTIF V Investigators
JAMA. 2005;293(6):690-698.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Ximelagatran—Promises and Concerns
Victor Gurewich
JAMA. 2005;293(6):736-739.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Bone Health and Osteoporosis: The Role of Vitamin K and Potential Antagonism by Anticoagulants
Pearson
Nutr Clin Pract 2007;22:517-544.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Incremental Benefit and Cost-Effectiveness of High-Dose Statin Therapy in High-Risk Patients With Coronary Artery Disease
Chan et al.
Circulation 2007;115:2398-2409.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Secondary Stroke Prevention With Ximelagatran Versus Warfarin in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation: Pooled Analysis of SPORTIF III and V Clinical Trials
Akins et al.
Stroke 2007;38:874-880.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Antithrombotic and interventional treatment options in cardioembolic transient ischaemic attack and ischaemic stroke
McCabe and Rakhit
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 2007;78:14-24.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Cost-Effectiveness of Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation
Chan et al.
J Am Coll Cardiol 2006;47:2513-2520.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Risk of Osteoporotic Fracture in Elderly Patients Taking Warfarin: Results From the National Registry of Atrial Fibrillation 2
Gage et al.
Arch Intern Med 2006;166:241-246.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Cost-effectiveness of Ximelagatran for Stroke Prevention
Perret-Guillaume and Wahl
JAMA 2005;293:2860-2861.
FULL TEXT  

Why Are We Still Using Warfarin?
JWatch Neurology 2005;2005:3-3.
FULL TEXT  

JournalScan
Malik
Heart 2005;91:703-704.
FULL TEXT  

Cost-Effectiveness of Ximelagatran for Stroke Prophylaxis
Journal Watch Cardiology 2005;2005:3-3.
FULL TEXT  

Ximelagatran--Promises and Concerns
Gurewich
JAMA 2005;293:736-739.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2005 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.