You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 294 No. 17, November 2, 2005 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Original Contribution
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on ISI (7)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related articles
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Topic Collections
 •Oncology
 •Cervical Cancer
 •Women's Health
 •Gynecology
 •Women's Health, Other
 •Randomized Controlled Trial
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati
What's this?

Feasibility of Management of High-Grade Cervical Lesions in a Single Visit

A Randomized Controlled Trial

Wendy R. Brewster, MD, PhD; F. Allan Hubbell, MD, MSPH; Joan Largent, MPH, PhD; Argyrios Ziogas, PhD; Fritz Lin, MD; Susan Howe, MPH; Theodore G. Ganiats, MD; Hoda Anton-Culver, PhD; Alberto Manetta, MD

JAMA. 2005;294:2182-2187.

Context  The incidence of cervical cancer is higher among low-income and minority women who have never undergone a conventional Papanicolaou test or who do not follow up after testing. Screening has been shown to reduce cervical cancer incidence rates.

Objectives  To determine the feasibility and acceptability of immediately treating women with severely abnormal Papanicolaou test results by using a single-visit cervical cancer screening and treatment program and to compare treatment rates and 12-month follow-up rates with those of women who received usual care.

Design, Setting, and Participants  Randomized controlled trial conducted among 3521 women aged 18 years or older recruited between January 1999 and April 2002 at US community health centers located in predominantly Latino underserved areas.

Interventions  Women randomized to usual care (n = 1805) were discharged immediately after examination. Women randomized to the single-visit group (n = 1716) remained at the clinic until the results of their conventional Papanicolaou test were available. Large loop electrosurgical excision procedure was performed in single-visit patients with either a diagnosis of a high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (HGSIL)/atypical glandular cells of undetermined significance (AGUS) or suspicion of carcinoma. All other patients with abnormal Papanicolaou test results were referred to abnormal cytology clinics or elected to receive follow-up care outside the study’s medical system.

Main Outcome Measures  Treatment rates for HGSIL/AGUS at 6 months, follow-up rates at 6 months for lower-grade lesions, and 1-year follow-up rates for all patients.

Results  The rate of abnormal Papanicolaou test results was 4.1%. One percent of results showed high-grade lesions. In the single-visit group, the mean visit time was 2.8 hours and the mean time for delivery and processing of the Papanicolaou tests was 66 minutes. Six months after randomization, 14 (88%) of 16 single-visit and 10 (53%) of 19 usual care patients with HGSIL/AGUS had completed treatment. Fifty percent in the single-visit program and 53% of usual care with less abnormal Papanicolaou tests completed treatment within 6 months. Overall, 36% in each group presented for a follow-up Papanicolaou test 1 year later. Women in the single-visit group with high-grade lesions (10/16; 63%) were significantly more likely to attend follow-up for Papanicolaou tests 12 months later than women with similar lesions in the usual care group (4/19; 21%).

Conclusions  For cervical cancer screening, the single-visit program was feasible and the degree of acceptability was high in this underserved population. Single visit programs provide an opportunity to increase the rate of immediate treatment and follow-up of women with severely abnormal Papanicolaou test results. This strategy did not improve follow-up rates for women with less-abnormal results.

Trial Registration  http://ClinicalTrials.govIdentifier: NCT00237562


Author Affiliations: Departments of Medicine (Drs Brewster, Hubbell, Largent, Ziogas, Lin, Anton-Culver, and Manetta), Obstetrics and Gynecology (Drs Brewster and Manetta), and Pathology (Dr Lin), School of Medicine, University of California, Irvine; Project Concern International, San Diego, Calif (Ms Howe); and Department of Family and Preventive Medicine, School of Medicine, University of California, San Diego (Dr Ganiats).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLES

Screen-and-Treat Approaches for Cervical Cancer Prevention in Low-Resource Settings: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Lynette Denny, Louise Kuhn, Michelle De Souza, Amy E. Pollack, William Dupree, and Thomas C. Wright, Jr
JAMA. 2005;294(17):2173-2181.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

A 21-Year-Old Woman With Atypical Squamous Cells of Undetermined Significance
George F. Sawaya
JAMA. 2005;294(17):2210-2218.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Cervical Cancer Prevention: Making Programs More Appropriate and Pragmatic
Paul D. Blumenthal and Lynne Gaffikin
JAMA. 2005;294(17):2225-2228.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Cost-Effectiveness of Cervical-Cancer Screening in Developing Countries
Suba et al.
NEJM 2006;354:1535-1536.
FULL TEXT  

Alternative Strategies for Preventing Cervical Cancer
JWatch Women's Health 2006;2006:6-6.
FULL TEXT  

A New Approach to Cervical Cancer Screening
JWatch General 2005;2005:2-2.
FULL TEXT  

Cervical Cancer Prevention: Making Programs More Appropriate and Pragmatic
Blumenthal and Gaffikin
JAMA 2005;294:2225-2228.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2005 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.