You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 294 No. 2, July 13, 2005 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Original Contribution
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on ISI (18)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Topic Collections
 •Quality of Care, Other
 •Randomized Controlled Trial
 •Patient-Physician Communication
 •End-of-life Care/ Palliative Medicine
 •Alert me on articles by topic

Improving the Use of Hospice Services in Nursing Homes

A Randomized Controlled Trial

David Casarett, MD, MA; Jason Karlawish, MD; Knashawn Morales, ScD; Roxane Crowley, BA; Terre Mirsch, RN, BSN, CHPN; David A. Asch, MD, MBA

JAMA. 2005;294:211-217.

Context  Hospice care may improve the quality of end-of-life care for nursing home residents, but hospice is underutilized by this population, at least in part because physicians are not aware of their patients’ preferences.

Objective  To determine whether it is possible to increase hospice utilization and improve the quality of end-of-life care by identifying residents whose goals and preferences are consistent with hospice care.

Design, Setting, and Participants  Randomized controlled trial (December 2003-December 2004) of nursing home residents and their surrogate decision makers (N=205) in 3 US nursing homes.

Intervention  A structured interview identified residents whose goals for care, treatment preferences, and palliative care needs made them appropriate for hospice care. These residents’ physicians were notified and asked to authorize a hospice informational visit.

Main Outcome Measures  The primary outcome measures were (1) hospice enrollment within 30 days of the intervention and (2) families’ ratings of the quality of care for residents who died during the 6-month follow-up period.

Results  Of the 205 residents in the study sample, 107 were randomly assigned to receive the intervention, and 98 received usual care. Intervention residents were more likely than usual care residents to enroll in hospice within 30 days (21/107 [20%] vs 1/98 [1%]; P<.001 [Fisher exact test]) and to enroll in hospice during the follow-up period (27/207 [25%] vs 6/98 [6%]; P<.001). Intervention residents had fewer acute care admissions (mean: 0.28 vs 0.49; P = .04 [Wilcoxon rank sum test]) and spent fewer days in an acute care setting (mean: 1.2 vs 3.0; P = .03 [Wilcoxon rank sum test]). Families of intervention residents rated the resident’s care more highly than did families of usual care residents (mean on a scale of 1-5: 4.1 vs 2.5; P = .04 [Wilcoxon rank sum test]).

Conclusion  A simple communication intervention can increase rates of hospice referrals and families’ ratings of end-of-life care and may also decrease utilization of acute care resources.


Author Affiliations: Center for Health Equity Research and Promotion at the Philadelphia Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Philadelphia, Pa (Drs Casarett and Asch); the Division of Geriatric Medicine (Drs Casarett and Karlawish), Center for Bioethics (Drs Casarett, Karlawish, and Asch), Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics (Drs Casarett, Karlawish, and Asch), and the Center for Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics (Dr Morales) at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia; Temple University Law School, Philadelphia, Pa (Ms Crowley); and Holy Redeemer Home Health and Hospice Care, Philadelphia, Pa (Ms Mirsch).



THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Effectiveness of Specialized Palliative Care: A Systematic Review
Zimmermann et al.
JAMA 2008;299:1698-1709.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Racial Differences in Hospice Use and In-Hospital Death Among Medicare and Medicaid Dual-Eligible Nursing Home Residents
Kwak et al.
Gerontologist 2008;48:32-41.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Evidence-Based Interventions to Improve the Palliative Care of Pain, Dyspnea, and Depression at the End of Life: A Clinical Practice Guideline from the American College of Physicians
Qaseem et al.
ANN INTERN MED 2008;148:141-146.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Evidence for Improving Palliative Care at the End of Life: A Systematic Review
Lorenz et al.
ANN INTERN MED 2008;148:147-159.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Absence of Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment in Elderly Medicaid-Insured Nursing Home Residents
Bradley et al.
JNCI J Natl Cancer Inst 2008;100:21-31.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

"I'm Not Ready for Hospice": Strategies for Timely and Effective Hospice Discussions
Casarett and Quill
ANN INTERN MED 2007;146:443-449.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

National trends in adult hospice use: 1991-1992 to 1999-2000.
Han et al.
Health Aff (Millwood) 2006;25:792-799.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Identifying hospice-appropriate nursing home residents for physicians increased hospice referrals and enrolment
Bishop
Evid. Based Med. 2006;11:49-49.
FULL TEXT  

Bridging the Continuum: Nutrition Support in Palliative and Hospice Care
Fuhrman and Herrmann
Nutr Clin Pract 2006;21:134-141.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Meeting Palliative Care Needs in Post-Acute Care Settings: "To Help Them Live Until They Die"
Hanson and Ersek
JAMA 2006;295:681-686.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Use of Hospice Services by Nursing Home Residents
JWatch General 2005;2005:6-6.
FULL TEXT  

What's new in the other general journals
BMJ 2005;331:181-182.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2005 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.