 |
|
CLINICIAN’S CORNER
Value and Limitations of Chest Pain History in the Evaluation of Patients With Suspected Acute Coronary Syndromes
Clifford J. Swap, MD, MS;
John T. Nagurney, MD, MPH
JAMA. 2005;294:2623-2629.
Context The chest pain history, physical examination, determination of coronary artery disease (CAD) risk factors, and the initial electrocardiogram compose the information immediately available to clinicians to help determine the probability of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) or acute coronary syndrome (ACS) in patients with chest pain. However, conflicting data exist about the usefulness of the chest pain history and which components are most useful.
Objective To identify the elements of the chest pain history that may be most helpful to the clinician in identifying ACS in patients presenting with chest pain.
Evidence Acquisition MEDLINE and Ovid were searched from 1970 to September 2005 by using specific key words and Medical Subject Heading terms. Reference lists of these articles and current cardiology textbooks were also consulted.
Evidence Synthesis Certain chest pain characteristics decrease the likelihood of ACS or AMI, namely, pain that is stabbing, pleuritic, positional, or reproducible by palpation (likelihood ratios [LRs] 0.2-0.3). Conversely, chest pain that radiates to one shoulder or both shoulders or arms or is precipitated by exertion is associated with LRs (2.3-4.7) that increase the likelihood of ACS. The chest pain history itself has not proven to be a powerful enough predictive tool to obviate the need for at least some diagnostic testing. Combinations of elements of the chest pain history with other initially available information, such as a history of CAD, have identified certain groups that may be safe for discharge without further evaluation, but further study is needed before such a recommendation can be considered reasonable.
Conclusion Although certain elements of the chest pain history are associated with increased or decreased likelihoods of a diagnosis of ACS or AMI, none of them alone or in combination identify a group of patients that can be safely discharged without further diagnostic testing.
Author Affiliations: Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston.
RELATED LETTERS
Cocktails for Two
Keith Wrenn
JAMA. 2006;295(19):2248-2249.
EXTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Cocktails for Two
Steve Goodacre
JAMA. 2006;295(19):2249.
EXTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Cocktails for Two—Reply
John T. Nagurney and Clifford J. Swap
JAMA. 2006;295(19):2249.
EXTRACT
| FULL TEXT
THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES
|
Chest Pain in the Emergency Department: Role of Multidetector CT
White and Kuo
Radiology 2007;245:672-681.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
ACC/AHA 2007 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Unstable Angina/Non-ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Revise the 2002 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Unstable Angina/Non-ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction) Developed in Collaboration with the American College of Emergency Physicians, the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and the Society of Thoracic Surgeons Endorsed by the American Association of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Rehabilitation and the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine
Anderson et al.
J Am Coll Cardiol 2007;50:e1-e157.
FULL TEXT
ACC/AHA 2007 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Unstable Angina/Non ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction Executive Summary: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Revise the 2002 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Unstable Angina/Non ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction) Developed in Collaboration with the American College of Emergency Physicians, the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and the Society of Thoracic Surgeons Endorsed by the American Association of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Rehabilitation and the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine
Anderson et al.
J Am Coll Cardiol 2007;50:652-726.
FULL TEXT
Coronary Artery Disease in Primary Care--Reply
Sequist and Lee
Arch Intern Med 2007;167:971-971.
FULL TEXT
Approach to managing undiagnosed chest pain: Could gastroesophageal reflux disease be the cause?
Flook et al.
cfp 2007;53:261-266.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Coronary Multidetector Computed Tomography in the Assessment of Patients With Acute Chest Pain
Hoffmann et al.
Circulation 2006;114:2251-2260.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Missed opportunities in the primary care management of early acute ischemic heart disease.
Sequist et al.
Arch Intern Med 2006;166:2237-2243.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Cocktails for two.
Goodacre
JAMA 2006;295:2249-2249.
FULL TEXT
Cocktails for two.
Wrenn
JAMA 2006;295:2248-2249.
FULL TEXT
Biomarkers of Cardiovascular Disease: Molecular Basis and Practical Considerations
Vasan
Circulation 2006;113:2335-2362.
FULL TEXT
Sophia
Spencer and Wyatt
Emerg. Med. J. 2006;23:328-328.
FULL TEXT
Really, How Helpful Is the Chest Pain History?
JWatch Emergency Med. 2006;2006:4-4.
FULL TEXT
Venous thromboembolism: Potentially dangerous diagnostic pitfalls arise from diagnostic tests
Jolobe
BMJ 2006;332:364-364.
FULL TEXT
What's new in the other general journals
Tonks
BMJ 2005;331:1293-1294.
FULL TEXT
|
