You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 294 No. 21, December 7, 2005 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Original Contribution
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on ISI (48)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related letters
 •Related article
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Topic Collections
 •Hypertension
 •Transplantation
 •Kidney Transplantation
 •Alert me on articles by topic

Deceased-Donor Characteristics and the Survival Benefit of Kidney Transplantation

Robert M. Merion, MD; Valarie B. Ashby, MA; Robert A. Wolfe, PhD; Dale A. Distant, MD; Tempie E. Hulbert-Shearon, MS; Robert A. Metzger, MD; Akinlolu O. Ojo, MD, PhD; Friedrich K. Port, MD, MS

JAMA. 2005;294:2726-2733.

Context  Transplantation using kidneys from deceased donors who meet the expanded criteria donor (ECD) definition (age ≥60 years or 50 to 59 years with at least 2 of the following: history of hypertension, serum creatinine level >1.5 mg/dL [132.6 µmol/L], and cerebrovascular cause of death) is associated with 70% higher risk of graft failure compared with non-ECD transplants. However, if ECD transplants offer improved overall patient survival, inferior graft outcome may represent an acceptable trade-off.

Objective  To compare mortality after ECD kidney transplantation vs that in a combined standard-therapy group of non-ECD recipients and those still receiving dialysis.

Design, Setting, and Patients  Retrospective cohort study using data from a US national registry of mortality and graft outcomes among kidney transplant candidates and recipients. The cohort included 109 127 patients receiving dialysis and added to the kidney waiting list between January 1, 1995, and December 31, 2002, and followed up through July 31, 2004.

Main Outcome Measure  Long-term (3-year) relative risk of mortality for ECD kidney recipients vs those receiving standard therapy, estimated using time-dependent Cox regression models.

Results  By end of follow-up, 7790 ECD kidney transplants were performed. Because of excess ECD recipient mortality in the perioperative period, cumulative survival did not equal that of standard-therapy patients until 3.5 years posttransplantation. Long-term relative mortality risk was 17% lower for ECD recipients (relative risk, 0.83; 95% confidence interval, 0.77-0.90; P<.001). Subgroups with significant ECD survival benefit included patients older than 40 years, both sexes, non-Hispanics, all races, unsensitized patients, and those with diabetes or hypertension. In organ procurement organizations (OPOs) with long median waiting times (>1350 days), ECD recipients had a 27% lower risk of death (relative risk, 0.73; 95% confidence interval, 0.64-0.83; P<.001). In areas with shorter waiting times, only recipients with diabetes demonstrated an ECD survival benefit.

Conclusions  ECD kidney transplants should be offered principally to candidates older than 40 years in OPOs with long waiting times. In OPOs with shorter waiting times, in which non-ECD kidney transplant availability is higher, candidates should be counseled that ECD survival benefit is observed only for patients with diabetes.


Author Affiliations: Departments of Surgery (Dr Merion) and Internal Medicine (Dr Ojo), University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor; Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients, Ann Arbor (Drs Merion, Wolfe, Ojo, and Port and Mss Ashby and Hulbert-Shearon); Department of Biostatistics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor (Dr Wolfe and Mss Ashby and Hulbert-Shearon); Department of Surgery, State University of New York Health Science Center at Brooklyn (Dr Distant); TransLife-Florida Hospital Medical Center, Orlando (Dr Metzger); and University Renal Research and Education Association, Ann Arbor (Dr Port).


RELATED LETTERS

Deceased Donor Characteristics and Kidney Transplantation
Colm C. Magee
JAMA. 2006;295(18):2140.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Deceased Donor Characteristics and Kidney Transplantation—Reply
Robert M. Merion, Valarie B. Ashby, and Friedrich K. Port
JAMA. 2006;295(18):2140.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

RELATED ARTICLE

Kidney Transplantation
Janet M. Torpy, Cassio Lynm, and Richard M. Glass
JAMA. 2005;294(21):2800.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Should we pay donors to increase the supply of organs for transplantation? Yes
Matas
BMJ 2008;336:1342-1342.
FULL TEXT  

Aortic Stiffness of Kidney Transplant Recipients Correlates with Donor Age
Delahousse et al.
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2008;19:798-805.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Novel Methods for Tracking Long-Term Maintenance Immunosuppression Regimens
Buchanan et al.
CJASN 2008;3:117-124.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Why We Should Develop a Regulated System of Kidney Sales: A Call for Action!
Matas
CJASN 2006;1:1129-1132.
FULL TEXT  

Long-term outcome of renal transplantation from older donors.
Raspollini et al.
NEJM 2006;354:2071-2074.
FULL TEXT  

Deceased donor characteristics and kidney transplantation.
Magee
JAMA 2006;295:2140-2140.
FULL TEXT  

Maximizing the Success of Transplantation with Kidneys from Older Donors
Delmonico and Burdick
NEJM 2006;354:411-413.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2005 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.