 |
|
The Long Road to Patient Safety
A Status Report on Patient Safety Systems
Daniel R. Longo, OblSB, ScD;
John E. Hewett, PhD;
Bin Ge, MD, MA;
Shari Schubert, BA
JAMA. 2005;294:2858-2865.
Context Since the Institute of Medicine (IOM) reports on medical errors and quality, national attention has focused on improving patient safety through changes in "systems" of care. These reports resulted in a new paradigm that, rather than centering on individual errors, focuses on the "systems" necessary to facilitate and enhance quality and protect patients.
Objectives To assess the status of hospital patient safety systems since the release of the IOM reports and to identify changes over time in 2 states that collaborated on a patient safety project funded by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality.
Design, Setting, and Participants Survey of all acute care hospitals in Missouri and Utah at 2 points in time, in 2002 and 2004, using a 91-item comprehensive questionnaire (n = 126 for survey 1 and n = 128 for survey 2). To assess changes over time, we also studied the cohort of 107 hospitals that responded to both surveys.
Main Outcome Measures Responses to the 91-question survey as well as changes in responses to the survey questions over an 18-month period. Seven latent variables were constructed to represent the most important patient safety constructs studied: computerized physician order entry systems, computerized test results, and assessments of adverse events; specific patient safety policies; use of data in patient safety programs; drug storage, administration, and safety procedures; manner of handling adverse event/error reporting; prevention policies; and root cause analysis. For each hospital, the 7 latent variables were summed to give an overall measure of the patient safety status of the hospital.
Results Development and implementation of patient safety systems is at best modest. Self-reported regression in patient safety systems was also found. While 74% of hospitals reported full implementation of a written patient safety plan, nearly 9% reported no plan. The area of surgery appears to have the greatest level of patient safety systems. Other areas, such as medications, with a long history of efforts in patient safety and error prevention, showed improvements, but the percentage of hospitals with various safety systems was already high at baseline for many systems. Some findings are surprising, given the overall trends; for example, while a substantial percentage of hospitals have medication safety systems, only 34.1% reported full implementation at survey 2 of computerized physician order entry systems for medications, despite the growth of computer technology in general and in hospital billing systems in particular.
Conclusions The current status of hospital patient safety systems is not close to meeting IOM recommendations. Data are consistent with recent reports that patient safety system progress is slow and is a cause for great concern. Efforts for improvement must be accelerated.
Author Affiliations: Department of Family and Community Medicine (Dr Longo and Ms Schubert) and Biostatistics Group (Drs Hewett and Ge), School of Medicine, University of Missouri–Columbia.
 CiteULike  Connotea  Del.icio.us  Digg  Reddit  Technorati
What's this?
RELATED ARTICLE
Creating a Safer Health Care System: Finding the Constraint
, , and
JAMA. ;294():2906-2908.
FULL TEXT
THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES
|
Market-based control mechanisms for patient safety
Coiera and Braithwaite
Qual Saf Health Care 2009;18:99-103.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Excess Cost and Length of Stay Associated With Voluntary Patient Safety Event Reports in Hospitals
Paradis et al.
American Journal of Medical Quality 2009;24:53-60.
ABSTRACT
Invited Article: The US health care system: Part 1: Our current system
Nuwer et al.
Neurology 2008;71:1907-1913.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
In-Hospital Falls of Newborn Infants: Data From a Multihospital Health Care System
Monson et al.
Pediatrics 2008;122:e277-e280.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
The Role for Leaders of Health Care Organizations in Patient Safety
Clarke et al.
American Journal of Medical Quality 2007;22:311-318.
ABSTRACT
The Extent and Importance of Unintended Consequences Related to Computerized Provider Order Entry
Ash et al.
J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 2007;14:415-423.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Rates and types of events reported to established incident reporting systems in two US hospitals
Nuckols et al.
Qual Saf Health Care 2007;16:164-168.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
A Survey of the Use of Ultrasound During Central Venous Catheterization
Bailey et al.
Anesth. Analg. 2007;104:491-497.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
The moderate success of quality of care improvement efforts: three observations on the situation
Katz-Navon et al.
Int J Qual Health Care 2007;19:4-7.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Patient Safety Rounds: Description of an Inexpensive but Important Strategy to Improve the Safety Culture
Campbell and Thompson
American Journal of Medical Quality 2007;22:26-33.
ABSTRACT
Comparison of Methodologies for Calculating Quality Measures Based on Administrative Data versus Clinical Data from an Electronic Health Record System: Implications for Performance Measures
Tang et al.
J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 2007;14:10-15.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Association of perceived medical errors with resident distress and empathy: a prospective longitudinal study.
West et al.
JAMA 2006;296:1071-1078.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Preventing Ventilator-associated Pneumonia: Tiptoeing through a Minefield.
Craven and Duncan
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2006;173:1297-1298.
FULL TEXT
Creating a Safer Health Care System: Finding the Constraint
Pauker et al.
JAMA 2005;294:2906-2908.
FULL TEXT
|
