You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 294 No. 6, August 10, 2005 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Clinical Review
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Topic Collections
 •Neurology
 •Prognosis/ Outcomes
 •Stroke
 •Critical Care/ Intensive Care Medicine
 •Adult Critical Care
 •Alert me on articles by topic

CLINICIAN’S CORNER
Prognosis and Decision Making in Severe Stroke

Robert G. Holloway, MD, MPH; Curtis G. Benesch, MD, MPH; W. Scott Burgin, MD; Justine B. Zentner, MSN, ANP

JAMA. 2005;294:725-733.

Context  An increasing number of deaths following severe stroke are due to terminal extubations. Variation in withdrawal-of-care practices suggests the possibility of unnecessary prolongation of suffering or of unwanted deaths.

Objectives  To review the available evidence on prognosis in mechanically ventilated stroke patients and to provide an overall framework to optimize decision making for clinicians, patients, and families.

Data Sources  Search of MEDLINE from 1980 through March 2005 for English-language articles addressing prognosis in mechanically ventilated stroke patients. From 689 articles identified, we selected 17 for further review. We also identified factors that influence, and decision-making biases that may result, in overuse or underuse of life-sustaining therapies, with a particular emphasis on mechanical ventilation.

Evidence Synthesis  Overall mortality among mechanically ventilated stroke patients is high, with a 30-day death rate approximating 58% (range in literature, 46%-75%). Although data are limited, among survivors as many as one third may have no or only slight disability, yet many others have severe disability. One can further refine prognosis according to knowledge of stroke syndromes, early patient characteristics, use of clinical prediction rules, and the need for continuing interventions. Factors influencing preferences for life-sustaining treatments include the severity and pattern of future clinical deficits, the probability of these deficits, and the burdens of treatments. Decision-making biases that may affect withdrawal-of-treatment decisions include erroneous prognostic estimates, inappropriate methods of communicating evidence, misunderstanding patient values and expectations, and failing to appreciate the extent to which patients can physically and psychologically adapt.

Conclusions  Although prognosis among mechanically ventilated stroke patients is generally poor, a minority do survive without severe disability. Prognosis can be assessed according to clinical presentation and patient characteristics. There is an urgent need to better understand the marked variation in the care of these patients and to reliably measure and improve the patient-centeredness of such decisions.


Author Affiliations: Department of Neurology (Drs Holloway, Benesch, and Burgin and Ms Zentner), Department of Community and Preventive Medicine (Dr Holloway), Department of Imaging Sciences (Dr Burgin), and the Center for Palliative Care and Clinical Ethics (Dr Holloway), University of Rochester School of Medicine, Rochester, NY.



THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Other articles noted
Evid. Based Med. 2006;11:31-32.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2005 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.