You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 294 No. 8, August 24/31, 2005 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Original Contribution
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (27)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Topic Collections
 •Pathology & Laboratory Medicine
 •Pediatrics
 •Neonatology and Infant Care
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Screening Healthy Infants for Iron Deficiency Using Reticulocyte Hemoglobin Content

Christina Ullrich, MD; Ann Wu, MD; Carrie Armsby, MD; Sarah Rieber, MPH; Sarah Wingerter, MD; Carlo Brugnara, MD; David Shapiro, PhD; Henry Bernstein, DO

JAMA. 2005;294:924-930.

Context  Current clinical practice relies on hemoglobin to detect iron deficiency, which misses infants not yet anemic and places them at higher risk for neurocognitive impairment. Reticulocyte hemoglobin content (CHr) has never been compared with hemoglobin for screening healthy infants.

Objectives  To evaluate CHr for detecting iron deficiency without anemia in healthy 9- to 12-month-old infants and to compare CHr with hemoglobin in screening for iron deficiency in this population. A secondary objective was to explore the association between CHr and subsequent development of anemia.

Design, Setting, and Patients  A prospective observational cohort study of 202 healthy 9- to 12-month-old infants from an urban, hospital-based, primary care clinic in Boston, Mass, who were screened for iron deficiency between June 2000 and April 2003, and followed up for a median of 5.6 months.

Main Outcome Measures  Iron deficiency (transferrin saturation <10%) and anemia (hemoglobin <11 g/dL).

Results  Of 202 infants enrolled, 23 (11.4%) had iron deficiency and 6 (3%) had iron deficiency and anemia. Iron-deficient and non–iron-deficient infants had significantly different values for all measured hematological and biochemical markers for iron deficiency. Optimal CHr cutoff for detecting iron deficiency was 27.5 pg (sensitivity, 83% and specificity, 72%); a hemoglobin level of less than 11 g/dL resulted in a sensitivity of 26% and a specificity of 95%. Reticulocyte hemoglobin content was more accurate overall than hemoglobin was for detecting iron deficiency (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, 0.85 vs 0.73; P = .007). A CHr of less than 27.5 pg without anemia at initial screening was associated with subsequent anemia when screened again in the second year of life (risk ratio, 9.1; 95% confidence interval, 1.04-78.9; P = .01).

Conclusions  A CHr of less than 27.5 pg is a more accurate hematological indicator of iron deficiency compared with hemoglobin of less than 11 g/dL in these healthy 9- to 12-month-old infants. Further studies are warranted to determine whether CHr should be the preferred screening tool in the early detection of iron deficiency in infants.


Author Affiliations: Departments of Medicine (Drs Ullrich, Wu, Armsby, Wingerter, and Bernstein, and Ms Rieber), Anesthesia (Dr Armsby), Infectious Disease and Emergency Medicine (Dr Wingerter), and Laboratory Medicine and Pathology (Dr Brugnara), Children’s Hospital Boston; and Department of Pediatric Oncology, Dana Farber Cancer Institute (Dr Ullrich), Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass; Department of Pediatrics, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Conn (Dr Wu); and Department of Biostatistics, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, Mass (Dr Shapiro).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2005 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.