You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 294 No. 9, September 7, 2005 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Original Contribution
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on ISI (20)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Topic Collections
 •Statistics and Research Methods
 •Journalology/ Peer Review/ Authorship
 •Medical Education
 •Alert me on articles by topic

Costs and Funding for Published Medical Education Research

Darcy A. Reed, MD, MPH; David E. Kern, MD, MPH; Rachel B. Levine, MD, MPH; Scott M. Wright, MD

JAMA. 2005;294:1052-1057.

Context  The Institute of Medicine has called for increased rigor of education research and funding to support educational innovation. However, funding for medical education research is scarce. The costs of conducting studies in medical education and how such research is currently funded have not been systematically evaluated.

Objectives  To determine how medical education research studies that were recently published were funded and to approximate the costs of conducting these studies.

Design, Setting, and Participants  We conducted a cross-sectional survey of first authors of medical education studies published from September 1, 2002, to December 31, 2003. Original medical education research studies conducted at US institutions and published in 13 prominent peer-reviewed journals were included.

Main Outcome Measures  For each study we measured duration, percentage of the authors’ total work commitment ("percentage effort") devoted to the study, resources used and their costs, attainment of funding, and the first author’s estimated cost of conducting the study. The cost of each study was calculated by multiplying the percentage effort of each author for the duration of the study by the national median salary for each author, according to specialty and academic rank, and then adding the costs of resources used.

Results  Responses were received from authors of 243 (84%) of 290 identified medical education studies. The median calculated cost of conducting the 243 studies was $24 471 (interquartile range [IQR], $11 531-$63 808). The median authors’ estimate of study cost was $10 000 (IQR, $4000-$25 000). Some funding was obtained for 72 (29.6%) of the studies. Of studies that were funded, the median amount of funding was $15 000 (IQR, $5000-$66 500). The median calculated cost of funded studies was $37 315 (IQR, $18 731-$82 393). Private foundation grants were the most common funding source (n = 30 [41.7%]). Factors independently associated with attaining funding were training in grant writing (odds ratio, 2.05; 95% confidence interval, 1.11-3.79) and number of medical education studies published by the first author (odds ratio, 2.4; 95% confidence interval, 1.24-4.63).

Conclusions  The majority of published medical education research is not formally funded, and the studies that do receive support are substantially underfunded. To realize the Institute of Medicine’s directive and to improve the quality of medical research, policy reform that increases funding for medical education scholarship will likely be required.


Author Affiliations: Division of Primary Care Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, Minn (Dr Reed); Division of General Internal Medicine, Johns Hopkins Bayview Medical Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Md (Drs Kern, Levine, and Wright).



THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Education Research: A program perspective on learning how to teach
Sheth et al.
Neurology 2008;70:e75-e77.
FULL TEXT  

Invited article: Neurology education research
Stern et al.
Neurology 2008;70:876-883.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Association Between Funding and Quality of Published Medical Education Research
Reed et al.
JAMA 2007;298:1002-1009.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Trends in Study Methods Used in Undergraduate Medical Education Research, 1969-2007
Baernstein et al.
JAMA 2007;298:1038-1045.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Medical education research remains the poor relation
Todres et al.
BMJ 2007;335:333-335.
FULL TEXT  

Effect of Multisource Feedback on Resident Communication Skills and Professionalism: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Brinkman et al.
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2007;161:44-49.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Writing the Methods
Coverdale et al.
Acad. Psychiatry 2006;30:361-364.
FULL TEXT  

A New Series on Medical Education.
Cox and Irby
NEJM 2006;355:1375-1376.
FULL TEXT  

Challenges for educationalists.
Schuwirth and van der Vleuten
BMJ 2006;333:544-546.
FULL TEXT  

Medical Education Theme Issue 2006: Call for Papers
Golub
JAMA 2006;295:330-330.
FULL TEXT  

Medical Education 2005: From Allegory to Bull Moose
Golub
JAMA 2005;294:1108-1110.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2005 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.