You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 295 No. 10, March 8, 2006 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Special Communication
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Correction
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on ISI (87)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related articles
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Topic Collections
 •Statistics and Research Methods
 •Randomized Controlled Trial
 •Alert me on articles by topic

Reporting of Noninferiority and Equivalence Randomized Trials

An Extension of the CONSORT Statement

Gilda Piaggio, PhD; Diana R. Elbourne, PhD; Douglas G. Altman, DSc; Stuart J. Pocock, PhD; Stephen J. W. Evans, MSc; for the CONSORT Group

JAMA. 2006;295:1152-1160.

The CONSORT (Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials) Statement, including a checklist and a flow diagram, was developed to help authors improve their reporting of randomized controlled trials. Its primary focus was on individually randomized trials with 2 parallel groups that assess the possible superiority of one treatment compared with another but is now being extended to other trial designs. Noninferiority and equivalence trials have methodological features that differ from superiority trials and present particular difficulties in design, conduct, analysis, and interpretation. Although the rationale for such trials occurs frequently, those designed and described specifically as noninferiority or equivalence trials appear less commonly in the medical literature. The quality of reporting of those that are published is often inadequate. In this article, we present an adapted CONSORT checklist for reporting noninferiority and equivalence trials and provide illustrative examples and explanations for those items amended from the original CONSORT checklist. The intent is to improve reporting of noninferiority and equivalence trials, enabling readers to assess the validity of their results and conclusions.


Author Affiliations: Statistics and Informatics Services Group, Department of Reproductive Health and Research, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland (Dr Piaggio); Medical Statistics Unit, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London (Drs Elbourne and Pocock and Mr Evans) and Centre for Statistics in Medicine, Oxford (Dr Altman), England.


RELATED ARTICLES

Quality of Reporting of Noninferiority and Equivalence Randomized Trials
Anne Le Henanff, Bruno Giraudeau, Gabriel Baron, and Philippe Ravaud
JAMA. 2006;295(10):1147-1151.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Lessons From and Cautions About Noninferiority and Equivalence Randomized Trials
Peter C. Gøtzsche
JAMA. 2006;295(10):1172-1174.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Tests for equivalence or non-inferiority - why?
DTB 2008;46:55-56.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Most tumour necrosis factor inhibitor trials in rheumatology are undeservedly called 'efficacy and safety' trials: a survey of power considerations
Yazici et al.
Rheumatology (Oxford) 2008;47:1054-1057.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Editorial: Wine and drug evaluations: lessons on making comparisons of noninferiority
Allgulander and Nutt
J Psychopharmacol 2008;22:341-342.
 

Effects of Age, Gender, Obesity, and Diabetes on the Efficacy and Safety of the Selective A2A Agonist Regadenoson Versus Adenosine in Myocardial Perfusion Imaging: Integrated ADVANCE-MPI Trial Results
Cerqueira et al.
J Am Coll Cardiol Img 2008;1:307-316.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Reporting Mortality Findings in Trials of Rofecoxib for Alzheimer Disease or Cognitive Impairment: A Case Study Based on Documents From Rofecoxib Litigation
Psaty and Kronmal
JAMA 2008;299:1813-1817.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Extending the CONSORT Statement to Randomized Trials of Nonpharmacologic Treatment: Explanation and Elaboration
Boutron et al.
ANN INTERN MED 2008;148:295-309.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Methods and Processes of the CONSORT Group: Example of an Extension for Trials Assessing Nonpharmacologic Treatments
Boutron et al.
ANN INTERN MED 2008;148:W-60-W-66.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Sirolimus-eluting stents versus bare-metal stents in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: 9-month angiographic and intravascular ultrasound results and 12-month clinical outcome results from the MISSION! Intervention Study.
van der Hoeven et al.
J Am Coll Cardiol 2008;51:618-626.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Short-Course Nitrofurantoin for the Treatment of Acute Uncomplicated Cystitis in Women
Gupta et al.
Arch Intern Med 2007;167:2207-2212.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Randomized Clinical Trial Design for Assessing Noninferiority When Superiority Is Expected
Freidlin et al.
JCO 2007;25:5019-5023.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies
Elm et al.
BMJ 2007;335:806-808.
FULL TEXT  

The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies
von Elm et al.
ANN INTERN MED 2007;147:573-577.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

STROBE: new standards for reporting observational epidemiology, a chance to improve
Ebrahim and Clarke
Int J Epidemiol 2007;36:946-948.
FULL TEXT  

Response to Dr Gotzche and Dr Bjarnason
Bingham
Rheumatology (Oxford) 2007;46:1624-1625.
FULL TEXT  

Anidulafungin and fluconazole for candidiasis.
Aberegg et al.
NEJM 2007;357:1347-1348.
FULL TEXT  

When Not Being Superior May Not Be Good Enough
Farjah and Flum
JAMA 2007;298:924-925.
FULL TEXT  

Non-Inferiority Trials in Surgical Oncology
Fueglistaler et al.
Ann. Surg. Oncol. 2007;14:1532-1539.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Update in Critical Care 2006
Milbrandt et al.
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2007;175:638-648.
FULL TEXT  

Optimal Timing for Use of Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa Inhibitors in Acute Coronary Syndromes: Questions, Answers, and More Questions
Mahaffey and Harrington
JAMA 2007;297:636-639.
FULL TEXT  

Fixed-Dose Unfractionated Heparin vs Low-Molecular-Weight Heparin for Venous Thromboembolism
Edwards
JAMA 2007;297:262-262.
FULL TEXT  

Telephone Administered Cognitive Behaviour Therapy for Treatment of Obsessive Compulsive Disorder: Randomised Controlled Non-inferiority Trial
Lovell et al.
Focus 2007;5:338-343.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Interval versus Continuous High-Intensity Exercise in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Randomized Trial
Puhan et al.
ANN INTERN MED 2006;145:816-825.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Peer Reviewing for the Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine: What Does It Take?
Neale et al.
J Am Board Fam Med 2006;19:643-647.
FULL TEXT  

Telephone administered cognitive behaviour therapy for treatment of obsessive compulsive disorder: randomised controlled non-inferiority trial
Lovell et al.
BMJ 2006;333:883.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Interpreting the Medical Literature
Satya-Murti
JAMA 2006;296:1410-1411.
FULL TEXT  

Angiotensin Receptor Blockers May Increase Risk of Myocardial Infarction: Unraveling the ARB-MI Paradox
Strauss and Hall
Circulation 2006;114:838-854.
FULL TEXT  

Good Enough: A Primer on the Analysis and Interpretation of Noninferiority Trials
Kaul and Diamond
ANN INTERN MED 2006;145:62-69.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Circumferential pulmonary-vein ablation for atrial fibrillation.
Wazni et al.
NEJM 2006;354:2289-2291.
FULL TEXT  

Lessons From and Cautions About Noninferiority and Equivalence Randomized Trials
Gotzsche
JAMA 2006;295:1172-1174.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2006 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.