 |
|
Controlled Delivery of High vs Low Humidity vs Mist Therapy for Croup in Emergency Departments
A Randomized Controlled Trial
Dennis Scolnik, MB, ChB;
Allan L. Coates, MD;
Derek Stephens, MSc;
Zelia Da Silva, RRT;
Elana Lavine, MD;
Suzanne Schuh, MD
JAMA. 2006;295:1274-1280.
Context Children with croup are often treated with humidity even though this is not scientifically based, consumes time, and can be harmful. Although humidity using the traditional blow-by technique is similar to room air and no water droplets reach the nasopharynx, particles sized for laryngeal deposition (5-10 µm) could be beneficial.
Objective To determine whether a significant difference in the clinical Westley croup score exists in children with moderate to severe croup who were admitted to the emergency department and who received either 100% humidity or 40% humidity via nebulizer or blow-by humidity.
Design and Setting A randomized, single-blind, controlled trial conducted between 2001 and 2004 in a tertiary care pediatric emergency department.
Participants A convenience sample of 140 previously healthy children 3 months to 10 years of age with Westley croup score of more than 1 or 2 or higher (scoring system range, 0-17); 21 families refused participation.
Intervention Thirty-minute administration of humidity using traditional blow-by technique (commonly used placebo, n = 48), controlled delivery of 40% humidity (optimally delivered placebo, n = 46), or 100% humidity (n = 46) with water particles of mass median diameter 6.21 µm.
Main Outcome Measure A priori defined change in the Westley croup score from baseline to 30 and 60 minutes in the 3 groups.
Results Groups were comparable before treatment. At 30 minutes the difference in the improvement in the croup score between the blow-by and low-humidity groups was 0.03 (95% confidence interval [CI], –0.72 to 0.66), between low- and high-humidity groups, 0.16 (95% CI, –0.86 to 0.53), and between blow-by and high-humidity groups, 0.19 (95% CI, –0.87 to 0.49). Results were similar at 60 minutes. Differences between groups in pulse and respiratory rates and oxygen saturation changes were insignificant, as were proportions of excellent responders; proportions with croup score of 0 at study conclusion; and proportions receiving dexamethasone, epinephrine, or requiring additional medical care or hospitalization.
Conclusions One hundred percent humidity with particles specifically sized to deposit in the larynx failed to result in greater improvement than 40% humidity or humidity by blow-by technique. This study does not support the use of humidity for moderate croup for patients treated in the emergency department.
Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00230841
Author Affiliations: Divisions of Pediatric Emergency Medicine (Drs Scolnik and Schuh), Clinical Pharmacology and Toxicology (Dr Scolnik), and Respiratory Medicine (Dr Coates), the Research Institute (Drs Scolnik, Schuh, and Coates and Mr Stephens), Department of Respiratory Therapy (Ms Da Silva), and Department of Pediatrics (Drs Scolnik, Schuh, Lavine, and Coates), The Hospital for Sick Children, and University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario.
 CiteULike  Connotea  Del.icio.us  Digg  Reddit  Technorati  Twitter
What's this?
RELATED LETTERS
High Humidity, Low Humidity, and Mist Therapy for Croup
Richard Gabor
JAMA. 2006;296(4):393-394.
EXTRACT
| FULL TEXT
High Humidity, Low Humidity, and Mist Therapy for Croup—Reply
Dennis Scolnik, Allan L. Coates, Derek Stephens, Zelia Da Silva, Elana Lavine, and Suzanne Schuh
JAMA. 2006;296(4):394.
EXTRACT
| FULL TEXT
THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES
|
Medicines used in respiratory diseases only seen in children
Lenney et al.
Eur Respir J 2009;34:531-551.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Croup
Cherry
NEJM 2008;358:384-391.
FULL TEXT
Humidified air inhalation for treating croup: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Moore and Little
Fam Pract 2007;24:295-301.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Delivery of 100%, 40%, and blow-by humidity did not differ for change in croup scores in children with moderate croup
Wyer
Evid. Based Med. 2006;11:142-142.
FULL TEXT
Delivery of 100%, 40%, and blow-by humidity did not differ for change in croup scores in children with moderate croup
Carter
Evid. Based Nurs. 2006;9:105-105.
FULL TEXT
High humidity, low humidity, and mist therapy for croup.
Gabor
JAMA 2006;296:393-394.
FULL TEXT
Sophia
Smith and Wyatt
Emerg. Med. J. 2006;23:586-586.
FULL TEXT
Humidity Treatment Does Not Improve Croup in the ED
Bratton
AAP Grand Rounds 2006;15:65-66.
FULL TEXT
Humidity of No Value for Croup
JWatch Emergency Med. 2006;2006:2-2.
FULL TEXT
Mist Doesn't Work for Croup
JWatch Pediatrics 2006;2006:4-4.
FULL TEXT
What's new in the other general journals.
Tonks
BMJ 2006;332:713-714.
FULL TEXT
Humidity and Viral Croup: No Value in Any Form
JWatch General 2006;2006:1-1.
FULL TEXT
|
