You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 295 No. 13, April 5, 2006 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  The Rational Clinical Examination
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (17)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related letters
 •Related article
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Topic Collections
 •Diagnosis
 •The Rational Clinical Examination
 •Gastroenterology
 •Gastrointestinal Diseases
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

CLINICIAN'S CORNER
Can the Clinical History Distinguish Between Organic and Functional Dyspepsia?

Paul Moayyedi, MD; Nicholas J. Talley, MD, PhD; M. Brian Fennerty, MD; Nimish Vakil, MD

JAMA. 2006;295:1566-1576.

Context  Upper gastrointestinal symptoms occur in 40% of the population. An accurate diagnosis would help rationalize investigation and treatment.

Objective  To systematically review the literature of the accuracy of primary care physicians, gastroenterologists, or computer models in diagnosing organic dyspepsia.

Data Sources  A search of Cochrane Controlled Trials Register (December 2003), MEDLINE (1966-December 2003), EMBASE (1988-December 2003), and CINAHL (1982-December 2003) for studies that reported on cohorts of patients attending for endoscopy that had symptoms, clinical opinion, or both recorded before investigation.

Study Selection  Studies that prospectively compared the diagnosis reached by a clinician, computer model, or both with results of upper gastrointestinal endoscopy in adult patients with upper gastrointestinal symptoms.

Data Extraction  Two authors independently assessed studies (n = 79) for eligibility and abstracted data for estimating likelihood ratios (LRs) of clinical opinion, computer models, or both in diagnosing an organic cause for dyspepsia.

Data Synthesis  Fifteen studies were identified that evaluated 11 366 patients, with 4817 patients (42%) classified as having organic dyspepsia. The computer models performed similarly to the clinician; therefore, the 2 approaches were combined. The diagnosis reached by the clinician or computer model suggesting organic dyspepsia had an LR of 1.6 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.4-1.8), and a negative result decreased the likelihood of organic dyspepsia (LR, 0.46; 95% CI, 0.38-0.55). A diagnosis of peptic ulcer disease performed similarly with an LR of 2.2 (95% CI, 1.9-2.6), but an evaluation that suggested the absence of peptic ulcer disease had an LR of 0.45 (95% CI, 0.38-0.53). A clinical history suggesting esophagitis had an LR of 2.4 (95% CI, 1.9-3.0) vs a negative history that had an LR of 0.50 (95% CI, 0.42-0.60).

Conclusion  Neither clinical impression nor computer models that incorporated patient demographics, risk factors, history items, and symptoms adequately distinguished between organic and functional disease in patients referred for endoscopic evaluation of dyspepsia.


Author Affiliations: Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario (Dr Moayyedi); Center for Enteric Neurosciences and Translational Epidemiological Research, Rochester, Minn (Dr Talley); Oregon Health and Science University, Portland (Dr Fennerty); and University of Wisconsin Medical School and College of Health Sciences, Marquette University, Milwaukee (Dr Vakil).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

RELATED LETTERS

Distinguishing Organic and Functional Dyspepsia by History
Robert Badgett
JAMA. 2006;296(11):1352.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Distinguishing Organic and Functional Dyspepsia by History—Reply
Paul Moayyedi, Nicholas J. Talley, M. Brian Fennerty, and Nimish Vakil
JAMA. 2006;296(11):1352-1353.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

RELATED ARTICLE

Dyspepsia
Janet M. Torpy, Cassio Lynm, and Richard M. Glass
JAMA. 2006;295(13):1612.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Investigating dyspepsia
Zagari et al.
BMJ 2008;337:a1400-a1400.
FULL TEXT  

A 32-Year-Old Woman With Chronic Abdominal Pain
Lacy and Cash
JAMA 2008;299:555-565.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Dyspepsia in general practice: incidence, risk factors, comorbidity and mortality
Wallander et al.
Fam Pract 2007;24:403-411.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Thermal Care of Functional Dyspepsia Based on Bicarbonate-Sulphate-Calcium Water: A Sequential Clinical Trial
Rocca et al.
Evid Based Complement Alternat Med 2007;4:381-391.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Distinguishing organic and functional dyspepsia by history.
Badgett
JAMA 2006;296:1352-1352.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2006 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.