You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 295 No. 15, April 19, 2006 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Original Contribution
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (57)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related letters
 •Related articles
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Topic Collections
 •Dentistry/ Oral Medicine
 •Pediatrics
 •Pediatrics, Other
 •Randomized Controlled Trial
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Neuropsychological and Renal Effects of Dental Amalgam in Children

A Randomized Clinical Trial

David C. Bellinger, PhD, MSc; Felicia Trachtenberg, PhD; Lars Barregard, MD, PhD; Mary Tavares, DMD, MPH; Elsa Cernichiari, MS; David Daniel, PhD; Sonja McKinlay, PhD

JAMA. 2006;295:1775-1783.

Context  No randomized trials have been published that address the concern that inhalation of mercury vapor released by amalgam dental restorations causes adverse health effects.

Objective  To compare the neuropsychological and renal function of children whose dental caries were restored using amalgam or mercury-free materials.

Design and Setting  The New England Children's Amalgam Trial was a 2-group randomized safety trial involving 5 community health dental clinics in Boston, Mass, and 1 in Farmington, Me, between September 1997 and March 2005.

Participants and Intervention  A total of 534 children aged 6 to 10 years at baseline with no prior amalgam restorations and 2 or more posterior teeth with caries were randomly assigned to receive dental restoration of baseline and incident caries during a 5-year follow-up period using either amalgam (n=267) or resin composite (n =267) materials.

Main Outcome Measures  The primary neuropsychological outcome was 5-year change in full-scale IQ scores. Secondary outcomes included tests of memory and visuomotor ability. Renal glomerular function was measured by creatinine-adjusted albumin in urine.

Results  Children had a mean of 15 tooth surfaces (median, 14) restored during the 5-year period (range, 0-55). Assignment to the amalgam group was associated with a significantly higher mean urinary mercury level (0.9 vs 0.6 µg/g of creatinine at year 5, P<.001). After adjusting for randomization stratum and other covariates, no statistically significant differences were found between children in the amalgam and composite groups in 5-year change in full-scale IQ score (3.1 vs 2.1, P = .21). The difference in treatment group change scores was 1.0 (95% confidence interval, –0.6 to 2.5) full-scale IQ score point. No statistically significant differences were found for 4-year change in the general memory index (8.1 vs 7.2, P = .34), 4-year change in visuomotor composite (3.8 vs 3.7, P = .93), or year 5 urinary albumin (median, 7.5 vs 7.4 mg/g of creatinine, P = .61).

Conclusions  In this study, there were no statistically significant differences in adverse neuropsychological or renal effects observed over the 5-year period in children whose caries were restored using dental amalgam or composite materials. Although it is possible that very small IQ effects cannot be ruled out, these findings suggest that the health effects of amalgam restorations in children need not be the basis of treatment decisions when choosing restorative dental materials.

Trial Registration  clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00065988


Author Affiliations: Department of Neurology, Children's Hospital Boston, and Harvard Medical School and Department of Environmental Health, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, Mass (Dr Bellinger); New England Research Institutes, Watertown, Mass (Drs Trachtenberg and McKinlay); Department of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Sahlgrenska University Hospital and Academy, Goteborg University, Goteborg, Sweden (Dr Barregard); The Forsyth Institute, Boston, Mass (Dr Tavares); Department of Environmental Medicine, University of Rochester School of Medicine, Rochester, NY (Ms Cernichiari); and the Department of Psychology, University of Maine at Farmington (Dr Daniel).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

RELATED LETTERS

Risks of dental amalgam in children.
and
JAMA. ;296():1461-1461.
FULL TEXT  

Risks of Dental Amalgam in Children--Reply

JAMA. ;296():1461-1461.
FULL TEXT  

RELATED ARTICLES

Neurobehavioral effects of dental amalgam in children: a randomized clinical trial.
, , , , , , , , , , and
JAMA. ;295():1784-1792.
FULL TEXT  

Mercury in dental amalgam--a neurotoxic risk?

JAMA. ;295():1835-1836.
FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Does Fluoride in Compomers Prevent Future Caries in Children?
Trachtenberg et al.
JDR 2009;88:276-279.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Mercury Exposure: Effects Across the Lifespan
Taber and Hurley
J. Neuropsychiatry Clin. Neurosi. 2008;20:iv-389.
FULL TEXT  

Legislation and Informed Consent Brochures for Dental Patients Receiving Amalgam Restorations
Edlich et al.
International Journal of Toxicology 2008;27:313-316.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Dental Amalgam and Psychosocial Status: The New England Children's Amalgam Trial
Bellinger et al.
JDR 2008;87:470-474.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Dental Amalgam and Antibiotic- and/or Mercury-resistant Bacteria
Roberts et al.
JDR 2008;87:475-479.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Reply
David et al.
Nephrol Dial Transplant 2008;23:1777-1778.
FULL TEXT  

Treatment of Health Complaints Attributed to Amalgam
Melchart et al.
JDR 2008;87:349-353.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Neurological outcomes in children with and without amalgam-related mercury exposure: Seven years of longitudinal observations in a randomized trial
Lauterbach et al.
Journal of the American Dental Association 2008;139:138-145.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

A Dose-Effect Analysis of Children's Exposure to Dental Amalgam and Neuropsychological Function: The New England Children's Amalgam Trial
Bellinger et al.
Journal of the American Dental Association 2007;138:1210-1216.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The longevity of amalgam versus compomer/composite restorations in posterior primary and permanent teeth: Findings From the New England Children's Amalgam Trial
Soncini et al.
Journal of the American Dental Association 2007;138:763-772.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Dental restoration with amalgam was not worse than resin composite material for children's health
Wray
Evid. Based Med. 2006;11:183-183.
FULL TEXT  

Neurobehavioral and Renal Effects of Dental Amalgam in Children
JWatch Neurology 2006;2006:9-9.
FULL TEXT  

Risks of dental amalgam in children.
Pigatto and Meroni
JAMA 2006;296:1461-1461.
FULL TEXT  

Neurotoxicity of mercury in dental amalgam.
Fung et al.
JAMA 2006;296:1462-1462.
FULL TEXT  

Neurotoxicity of Mercury in Dental Amalgam--Reply
Needleman
JAMA 2006;296:1462-1463.
FULL TEXT  

CARPHOLOGY by Rajendra
PN 2006;6:268-268.
FULL TEXT  

No Neurobehavioral Effect of Mercury in Dental Amalgam
Schiff
AAP Grand Rounds 2006;16:80-81.
FULL TEXT  

No Harm Found from Mercury in Dental Amalgam
JWatch Pediatrics 2006;2006:5-5.
FULL TEXT  

What's new in the other general journals.
Tonks
BMJ 2006;332:1025-1026.
FULL TEXT  

Mercury in dental amalgam--a neurotoxic risk?
Needleman
JAMA 2006;295:1835-1836.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2006 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.