This Article  • Full text  • PDF  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Citation map  • Citing articles on HighWire  • Citing articles on Web of Science (40)  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Related letters  • Related article  • Similar articles in JAMA  Topic Collections  • Women's Health  • Pregnancy and Breast Feeding  • Review  • Prognosis/ Outcomes  • Alert me on articles by topic  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

A Meta-analysis

Agustin Conde-Agudelo, MD, MPH; Anyeli Rosas-Bermúdez, MPH; Ana Cecilia Kafury-Goeta, MD

JAMA. 2006;295:1809-1823.

Context  Both short and long interpregnancy intervals have been associated with an increased risk of adverse perinatal outcomes. However, whether this possible association is confounded by maternal characteristics or socioeconomic status is uncertain.

Objective  To examine the association between birth spacing and relative risk of adverse perinatal outcomes.

Data Sources  Studies published in any language were retrieved by searching MEDLINE (1966 through January 2006), EMBASE, ECLA, POPLINE, CINAHL, and LILACS, proceedings of meetings on birth spacing, and bibliographies of retrieved articles, and by contact with relevant researchers in the field.

Study Selection  Included studies were cohort, cross-sectional, and case-control studies with results adjusted for at least maternal age and socioeconomic status, reporting risk estimates and 95% confidence intervals (or data to calculate them) of birth spacing and perinatal outcomes. Of 130 articles identified in the search, 67 (52%) were included.

Data Extraction  Information on study design, participant characteristics, measure of birth spacing used, measures of outcome, control for potential confounding factors, and risk estimates was abstracted independently by 2 investigators using a standardized protocol.

Data Synthesis  A random-effects model and meta-regression analyses were used to pool data from individual studies. Compared with interpregnancy intervals of 18 to 23 months, interpregnancy intervals shorter than 6 months were associated with increased risks of preterm birth, low birth weight, and small for gestational age (pooled adjusted odds ratios [95% confidence intervals]: 1.40 [1.24-1.58], 1.61 [1.39-1.86], and 1.26 [1.18-1.33], respectively). Intervals of 6 to 17 months and longer than 59 months were also associated with a significantly greater risk for the 3 adverse perinatal outcomes.

Conclusions  Interpregnancy intervals shorter than 18 months and longer than 59 months are significantly associated with increased risk of adverse perinatal outcomes. These data suggest that spacing pregnancies appropriately could help prevent such adverse perinatal outcomes.

Author Affiliations: Centro de Estudios e Investigación en Salud and Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Fundación Santa Fe de Bogotá, Bogotá, Colombia (Dr Conde-Agudelo); Department of Biostatistics, Universidad Autonoma de Occidente, Cali, Colombia (Ms Rosas-Bermúdez); and Clínica Materno-Infantil Los Farallones, Cali, Colombia (Dr Kafury-Goeta).

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter     What's this?

RELATED LETTERS

Birth Spacing and Adverse Perinatal Outcomes
H. C. J. Scheepers and Didi Braat
JAMA. 2006;296(8):929.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Birth Spacing and Adverse Perinatal Outcomes—Reply
Agustín Conde-Agudelo, Anyeli Rosas-Bermúdez, and Ana Cecilia Kafury-Goeta
JAMA. 2006;296(8):929-930.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

RELATED ARTICLE

Birth Spacing—The Long and Short of It
Rachel A. Royce
JAMA. 2006;295(15):1837-1838.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Re: "Risk of Oral Clefts in Relation to Prepregnancy Weight Change and Interpregnancy Interval"
Smits and Hukkelhoven
Am J Epidemiol 2008;168:1092-1093.
FULL TEXT  

Birth Interval and Risk of Stillbirth or Neonatal Death: Findings from Rural North India
Williams et al.
J Trop Pediatr 2008;54:321-327.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Association between short interpregnancy intervals and term birth weight: the role of folate depletion
van Eijsden et al.
Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2008;88:147-153.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Maternal Age, Exposure to Siblings, and Risk of Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis
Fang et al.
Am J Epidemiol 2008;167:1281-1286.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

History of Fetal Growth Restriction Is More Strongly Associated With Severe Rather Than Milder Pregnancy-Induced Hypertension
Rasmussen and Irgens
Hypertension 2008;51:1231-1238.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Birth spacing and adverse perinatal outcomes.
Scheepers and Braat
JAMA 2006;296:929-929.
FULL TEXT  

What's new in the other general journals.
Tonks
BMJ 2006;332:1025-1026.
FULL TEXT  

Birth spacing--the long and short of it.
Royce
JAMA 2006;295:1837-1838.
FULL TEXT