You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 295 No. 17, May 3, 2006 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Original Contribution
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on ISI (68)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related letters
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Topic Collections
 •Hypertension
 •Prognosis/ Outcomes
 •Cardiovascular Disease/ Myocardial Infarction
 •Alert me on articles by topic

Disease and Disadvantage in the United States and in England

James Banks, PhD; Michael Marmot, MD; Zoe Oldfield, MSc; James P. Smith, PhD

JAMA. 2006;295:2037-2045.

Context  The United States spends considerably more money on health care than the United Kingdom, but whether that translates to better health outcomes is unknown.

Objective  To assess the relative heath status of older individuals in England and the United States, especially how their health status varies by important indicators of socioeconomic position.

Design, Setting, and Participants  We analyzed representative samples of residents aged 55 to 64 years from both countries using 2002 data from the US Health and Retirement Survey (n = 4386) and the English Longitudinal Study of Aging (n = 3681), which were designed to have directly comparable measures of health, income, and education. This analysis is supplemented by samples of those aged 40 to 70 years from the 1999-2002 waves of National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (n = 2097) and the 2003 wave of the Health Survey for England (n = 5526). These surveys contain extensive and comparable biological disease markers on respondents, which are used to determine whether differential propensities to report illness can explain these health differences. To ensure that health differences are not solely due to health issues in the black or Latino populations in the United States, the analysis is limited to non-Hispanic whites in both countries.

Main Outcome Measure  Self-reported prevalence rates of several chronic diseases related to diabetes and heart disease, adjusted for age and health behavior risk factors, were compared between the 2 countries and across education and income classes within each country.

Results  The US population in late middle age is less healthy than the equivalent British population for diabetes, hypertension, heart disease, myocardial infarction, stroke, lung disease, and cancer. Within each country, there exists a pronounced negative socioeconomic status (SES) gradient with self-reported disease so that health disparities are largest at the bottom of the education or income variants of the SES hierarchy. This conclusion is generally robust to control for a standard set of behavioral risk factors, including smoking, overweight, obesity, and alcohol drinking, which explain very little of these health differences. These differences between countries or across SES groups within each country are not due to biases in self-reported disease because biological markers of disease exhibit exactly the same patterns. To illustrate, among those aged 55 to 64 years, diabetes prevalence is twice as high in the United States and only one fifth of this difference can be explained by a common set of risk factors. Similarly, among middle-aged adults, mean levels of C-reactive protein are 20% higher in the United States compared with England and mean high-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels are 14% lower. These differences are not solely driven by the bottom of the SES distribution. In many diseases, the top of the SES distribution is less healthy in the United States as well.

Conclusion  Based on self-reported illnesses and biological markers of disease, US residents are much less healthy than their English counterparts and these differences exist at all points of the SES distribution.


Author Affiliations: University College London and Institute for Fiscal Studies (Dr Banks), Department of Epidemiology, University College London (Dr Marmot) and Institute for Fiscal Studies (Ms Oldfield), London, England; and RAND Corp, Santa Monica, Calif (Dr Smith).


RELATED LETTERS

Comparison of Health Status Between the United States and England
Gwen Szwarc Hanson
JAMA. 2006;296(19):2312.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Comparison of Health Status Between the United States and England
Caroline F. Thorn
JAMA. 2006;296(19):2312.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Comparison of Health Status Between the United States and England
Edward Whitney
JAMA. 2006;296(19):2312-2313.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Comparison of Health Status Between the United States and England—Reply
James Banks, Michael Marmot, Zoe Oldfield, and James P. Smith
JAMA. 2006;296(19):2313.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Socioeconomic Disadvantage and Kidney Disease in the United States, Australia, and Thailand
White et al.
Am. J. Public Health 2008;98:1306-1313.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Racial Disparities in Receipt of Hip and Knee Joint Replacements Are Not Explained by Need: The Health and Retirement Study 1998-2004
Steel et al.
J. Gerontol. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci. 2008;63:629-634.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

US and Scottish Health Professionals' Attitudes toward DNA Biobanking
Leiman et al.
J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 2008;15:357-362.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Discretionary Decision Making By Primary Care Physicians And The Cost Of U.S. Health Care
Sirovich et al.
Health Aff (Millwood) 2008;27:813-823.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Racial disparity in hospice use in the United States in 2002
Connor et al.
Palliat Med 2008;22:205-213.
ABSTRACT  

Income Inequality and Socioeconomic Gradients in Mortality
Wilkinson and Pickett
Am. J. Public Health 2008;98:699-704.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Population health and the health system: a comparative analysis of avoidable mortality in three nations and their world cities
Weisz et al.
Eur J Public Health 2008;18:166-172.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Health Consequences of Declining Incomes
Muennig
JAMA 2008;299:633-633.
FULL TEXT  

Survival after liver transplantation in the United Kingdom and Ireland compared with the United States
Dawwas et al.
Gut 2007;56:1606-1613.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

A Cross-National Comparison of Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Low Birth Weight in the United States and England
Teitler et al.
Pediatrics 2007;120:e1182-e1189.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Social Gradients in Oral and General Health
Sabbah et al.
J. Dent. Res. 2007;86:992-996.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

On the potential for illogic with logically defined outcomes
Li et al.
Biostatistics 2007;8:800-804.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Does participation in a population-based dietary intervention scheme have a lasting impact on fruit intake in young children?
Fogarty et al.
Int J Epidemiol 2007;36:1080-1085.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Health Spending In OECD Countries In 2004: An Update
Anderson et al.
Health Aff (Millwood) 2007;26:1481-1489.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Economics of Health and Mortality Special Feature: Nature and causes of trends in male diabetes prevalence, undiagnosed diabetes, and the socioeconomic status health gradient
Smith
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2007;104:13225-13231.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Cognitive Impairment, Chronic Disease Burden, and Functional Disability: A Population Study of Older Italians
Scanlan et al.
AJGP 2007;15:716-724.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Differences in pharmacy terminology and practice between the United Kingdom and the United States
Brock and Franklin
Am J Health Syst Pharm 2007;64:1541-1546.
FULL TEXT  

Baseline Health, Socioeconomic Status, and 10-Year Mortality Among Older Middle-Aged Americans: Findings From the Health and Retirement Study, 1992 2002
Feinglass et al.
J. Gerontol. B Psychol. Sci. Soc. Sci. 2007;62:S209-S217.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Diabetes, Common Mental Disorders, and Disability: Findings From the UK National Psychiatric Morbidity Survey
Das-Munshi et al.
Psychosom. Med. 2007;69:543-550.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Who Participates in Diabetes Self-management Interventions?: Issues of Recruitment and Retainment
Thoolen et al.
The Diabetes Educator 2007;33:465-474.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Self-Rated Health Trajectories in the United States and the United Kingdom: A Comparative Study
Sacker et al.
Am. J. Public Health 2007;97:812-818.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Leading the Elephant Out of the Corner: The Future of Health Care: Presidential Address at the American Heart Association 2006 Scientific Sessions
Gibbons
Circulation 2007;115:2221-2230.
FULL TEXT  

Invited Commentary: Beyond the Metrics for Measuring Neighborhood Effects
Messer
Am J Epidemiol 2007;165:868-871.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Household Wealth and the Metabolic Syndrome in the Whitehall II Study
Perel et al.
Diabetes Care 2006;29:2694-2700.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Comparison of Health Status Between the United States and England.
Hanson
JAMA 2006;296:2312-2312.
FULL TEXT  

Comparison of Health Status Between the United States and England.
Thorn
JAMA 2006;296:2312-2312.
FULL TEXT  

Comparison of Health Status Between the United States and England.
Whitney
JAMA 2006;296:2312-2313.
FULL TEXT  

A Jacobian Future: Can Everyone Have a Medical Home?
Pan
Pediatrics 2006;118:1254-1256.
FULL TEXT  

Some frontiers in social science.
Butz and Torrey
Science 2006;312:1898-1900.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Health in the U.S. Is Worse Than in England
JWatch Emergency Med. 2006;2006:9-9.
FULL TEXT  

Disease and Socioeconomic Status in the U.S. and England
Journal Watch Cardiology 2006;2006:6-6.
FULL TEXT  

Middle aged white people are healthier in England than US
Tanne
BMJ 2006;332:1047-1047.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2006 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.