You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 295 No. 5, February 1, 2006 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  The Rational Clinical Examination
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •VIDEO SUPPLEMENT
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on ISI (18)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related articles
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Topic Collections
 •Diagnosis
 •The Rational Clinical Examination
 •Physical Examination
 •Alert me on articles by topic

CLINICIAN’S CORNER
Does the Clinical Examination Predict Lower Extremity Peripheral Arterial Disease?

Nadia A. Khan, MD, MSc; Sherali A. Rahim, MD; Sonia S. Anand, MD, PhD; David L. Simel, MD, MHS; Akbar Panju, MB, ChB

JAMA. 2006;295:536-546.

Context  Lower extremity peripheral arterial disease (PAD) is common and associated with significant increases in morbidity and mortality. Physicians typically depend on the clinical examination to identify patients who need further diagnostic testing.

Objective  To systematically review the accuracy and precision of the clinical examination for PAD.

Data Sources, Study Selection, and Data Extraction  MEDLINE (January 1966 to March 2005) and Cochrane databases were searched for articles on the diagnosis of PAD based on physical examination published in the English language. Included studies compared an element of the history or physical examination with a reference standard of ankle-brachial index, duplex sonography, or angiogram. Seventeen of the 51 potential articles identified met inclusion criteria. Two of the authors independently extracted data, performed quality review, and used consensus to resolve any discrepancies.

Data Synthesis  For asymptomatic patients, the most useful clinical findings to diagnose PAD are the presence of claudication (likelihood ratio [LR], 3.30; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.30-4.80), femoral bruit (LR, 4.80; 95% CI, 2.40-9.50), or any pulse abnormality (LR, 3.10; 95% CI, 1.40-6.60). While none of the clinical examination features help to lower the likelihood of any degree of PAD, the absence of claudication or the presence of normal pulses decreases the likelihood of moderate to severe disease. When considering patients who are symptomatic with leg complaints, the most useful clinical findings are the presence of cool skin (LR, 5.90; 95% CI, 4.10-8.60), the presence of at least 1 bruit (LR, 5.60; 95% CI, 4.70-6.70), or any palpable pulse abnormality (LR, 4.70; 95% CI, 2.20-9.90). The absence of any bruits (iliac, femoral, or popliteal) (LR, 0.39; 95% CI, 0.34-0.45) or pulse abnormality (LR, 0.38; 95% CI, 0.23-0.64) reduces the likelihood of PAD. Combinations of physical examination findings do not increase the likelihood of PAD beyond that of individual clinical findings. However, when combinations of clinical findings are all normal, the likelihood of disease is lower than when individual symptoms or signs are normal. A PAD scoring system, which includes auscultation of arterial components by handheld Doppler, provides greater diagnostic accuracy.

Conclusions  Clinical examination findings must be used in the context of the pretest probability because they are not independently sufficient to include or exclude a diagnosis of PAD with certainty. The PAD screening score using the hand-held Doppler has the greatest diagnostic accuracy.


Author Affiliations: Department of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver (Dr Khan); Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario (Drs Rahim, Anand, and Panju); and Durham Veterans Affairs Medical Center and Department of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, NC (Dr Simel).


RELATED ARTICLES

Medical Treatment of Peripheral Arterial Disease
Graeme J. Hankey, Paul E. Norman, and John W. Eikelboom
JAMA. 2006;295(5):547-553.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Peripheral Arterial Disease
Lise M. Stevens, Cassio Lymn, and Richard M. Glass
JAMA. 2006;295(5):584.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Ankle-brachial index measured by palpation for the diagnosis of peripheral arterial disease
Migliacci et al.
Fam Pract 2008;0:cmn035v1-cmn035.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Arterial structure and function and environmental exposure to cadmium
Schutte et al.
Occup. Environ. Med. 2008;65:412-419.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Intramedullary nailing of fractures of the tibia in diabetics
Aderinto and Keating
J Bone Joint Surg Br 2008;90-B:638-642.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Basic Science Review: The Myopathy of Peripheral Arterial Occlusive Disease: Part 2. Oxidative Stress, Neuropathy, and Shift in Muscle Fiber Type
Pipinos et al.
VASC ENDOVASCULAR SURG 2008;42:101-112.
ABSTRACT  

Does This Patient With Diabetes Have Osteomyelitis of the Lower Extremity?
Butalia et al.
JAMA 2008;299:806-813.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Sophia
Smith and Wyatt
Emerg. Med. J. 2006;23:586-586.
FULL TEXT  

Risk Factors for Foot Infections in Individuals With Diabetes.
Lavery et al.
Diabetes Care 2006;29:1288-1293.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2006 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.