 |
|
CLINICIAN’S CORNER
Does the Clinical Examination Predict Lower Extremity Peripheral Arterial Disease?
Nadia A. Khan, MD, MSc;
Sherali A. Rahim, MD;
Sonia S. Anand, MD, PhD;
David L. Simel, MD, MHS;
Akbar Panju, MB, ChB
JAMA. 2006;295:536-546.
Context Lower extremity peripheral arterial disease (PAD) is common and associated with significant increases in morbidity and mortality. Physicians typically depend on the clinical examination to identify patients who need further diagnostic testing.
Objective To systematically review the accuracy and precision of the clinical examination for PAD.
Data Sources, Study Selection, and Data Extraction MEDLINE (January 1966 to March 2005) and Cochrane databases were searched for articles on the diagnosis of PAD based on physical examination published in the English language. Included studies compared an element of the history or physical examination with a reference standard of ankle-brachial index, duplex sonography, or angiogram. Seventeen of the 51 potential articles identified met inclusion criteria. Two of the authors independently extracted data, performed quality review, and used consensus to resolve any discrepancies.
Data Synthesis For asymptomatic patients, the most useful clinical findings to diagnose PAD are the presence of claudication (likelihood ratio [LR], 3.30; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.30-4.80), femoral bruit (LR, 4.80; 95% CI, 2.40-9.50), or any pulse abnormality (LR, 3.10; 95% CI, 1.40-6.60). While none of the clinical examination features help to lower the likelihood of any degree of PAD, the absence of claudication or the presence of normal pulses decreases the likelihood of moderate to severe disease. When considering patients who are symptomatic with leg complaints, the most useful clinical findings are the presence of cool skin (LR, 5.90; 95% CI, 4.10-8.60), the presence of at least 1 bruit (LR, 5.60; 95% CI, 4.70-6.70), or any palpable pulse abnormality (LR, 4.70; 95% CI, 2.20-9.90). The absence of any bruits (iliac, femoral, or popliteal) (LR, 0.39; 95% CI, 0.34-0.45) or pulse abnormality (LR, 0.38; 95% CI, 0.23-0.64) reduces the likelihood of PAD. Combinations of physical examination findings do not increase the likelihood of PAD beyond that of individual clinical findings. However, when combinations of clinical findings are all normal, the likelihood of disease is lower than when individual symptoms or signs are normal. A PAD scoring system, which includes auscultation of arterial components by handheld Doppler, provides greater diagnostic accuracy.
Conclusions Clinical examination findings must be used in the context of the pretest probability because they are not independently sufficient to include or exclude a diagnosis of PAD with certainty. The PAD screening score using the hand-held Doppler has the greatest diagnostic accuracy.
Author Affiliations: Department of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver (Dr Khan); Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario (Drs Rahim, Anand, and Panju); and Durham Veterans Affairs Medical Center and Department of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, NC (Dr Simel).
 CiteULike  Connotea  Del.icio.us  Digg  Reddit  Technorati  Twitter
What's this?
RELATED ARTICLES
Medical Treatment of Peripheral Arterial Disease
Graeme J. Hankey, Paul E. Norman, and John W. Eikelboom
JAMA. 2006;295(5):547-553.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Peripheral Arterial Disease
Lise M. Stevens, Cassio Lymn, and Richard M. Glass
JAMA. 2006;295(5):584.
EXTRACT
| FULL TEXT
THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES
|
The Ankle-Brachial Index as a Biomarker of Cardiovascular Risk: It's Not Just About the Legs
Perlstein and Creager
Circulation 2009;120:2033-2035.
FULL TEXT
The diagnostic value of history and physical examination for COPD in suspected or known cases: a systematic review
Broekhuizen et al.
Fam Pract 2009;26:260-268.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Emerging Evidence for Neuroischemic Diabetic Foot Ulcers: Model of Care and How to Adapt Practice
Ndip and Jude
INT J LOW EXTREM WOUNDS 2009;8:82-94.
ABSTRACT
A Review of the Pathophysiology, Classification, and Treatment of Foot Ulcers in Diabetic Patients
Clayton and Elasy
Clin. Diabetes 2009;27:52-58.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Different Calculations of Ankle-Brachial Index and Their Impact on Cardiovascular Risk Prediction
Espinola-Klein et al.
Circulation 2008;118:961-967.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Comprehensive Foot Examination and Risk Assessment: A report of the Task Force of the Foot Care Interest Group of the American Diabetes Association, with endorsement by the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists
Boulton et al.
Diabetes Care 2008;31:1679-1685.
FULL TEXT
Ankle-brachial index measured by palpation for the diagnosis of peripheral arterial disease
Migliacci et al.
Fam Pract 2008;25:228-232.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Arterial structure and function and environmental exposure to cadmium
Schutte et al.
Occup. Environ. Med. 2008;65:412-419.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Intramedullary nailing of fractures of the tibia in diabetics
Aderinto and Keating
J Bone Joint Surg Br 2008;90-B:638-642.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Basic Science Review: The Myopathy of Peripheral Arterial Occlusive Disease: Part 2. Oxidative Stress, Neuropathy, and Shift in Muscle Fiber Type
Pipinos et al.
VASC ENDOVASCULAR SURG 2008;42:101-112.
ABSTRACT
Does This Patient With Diabetes Have Osteomyelitis of the Lower Extremity?
Butalia et al.
JAMA 2008;299:806-813.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Sophia
Smith and Wyatt
Emerg. Med. J. 2006;23:586-586.
FULL TEXT
Risk Factors for Foot Infections in Individuals With Diabetes.
Lavery et al.
Diabetes Care 2006;29:1288-1293.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
|
