You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 296 No. 10, September 13, 2006 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Original Contribution
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Author in the Room Audio
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on ISI (8)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related letters
 •Related article
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Topic Collections
 •Drug Therapy, Other
 •Randomized Controlled Trial
 •Otolaryngology/ Head & Neck Surgery
 •Middle/ External Ear Disorders
 •Author in the Room
 •Alert me on articles by topic

Wait-and-See Prescription for the Treatment of Acute Otitis Media

A Randomized Controlled Trial

David M. Spiro, MD, MPH; Khoon-Yen Tay, MD; Donald H. Arnold, MD, MPH; James D. Dziura, PhD; Mark D. Baker, MD; Eugene D. Shapiro, MD

JAMA. 2006;296:1235-1241.

Context  Acute otitis media (AOM) is the most common diagnosis for which antibiotics are prescribed for children. Previous trials that have evaluated a "wait-and-see prescription" (WASP) for antibiotics, with which parents are asked not to fill the prescription unless the child either is not better or is worse in 48 hours, have excluded children with severe AOM. None of these trials were conducted in an emergency department.

Objectives  To determine whether treatment of AOM using a WASP significantly reduces use of antibiotics compared with a "standard prescription" (SP) and to evaluate the effects of this intervention on clinical symptoms and adverse outcomes related to antibiotic use.

Design, Setting, and Patients  A randomized controlled trial conducted between July 12, 2004, and July 11, 2005. Children with AOM aged 6 months to 12 years seen in an emergency department were randomly assigned to receive either a WASP or an SP. All patients received ibuprofen and otic analgesic drops for use at home. A research assistant, blinded to group assignment, conducted structured phone interviews 4 to 6, 11 to 14, and 30 to 40 days after enrollment to determine outcomes.

Main Outcome Measures  Filling of the antibiotic prescription and clinical course.

Results  Overall, 283 patients were randomized either to the WASP group (n = 138) or the SP group (n = 145). Substantially more parents in the WASP group did not fill the antibiotic prescription (62% vs 13%; P<.001). There was no statistically significant difference between the groups in the frequency of subsequent fever, otalgia, or unscheduled visits for medical care. Within the WASP group, both fever (relative risk [RR], 2.95; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.75 - 4.99; P<.001) and otalgia (RR, 1.62; 95% CI, 1.26 - 2.03; P<.001) were associated with filling the prescription.

Conclusion  The WASP approach substantially reduced unnecessary use of antibiotics in children with AOM seen in an emergency department and may be an alternative to routine use of antimicrobials for treatment of such children.

Trial Registration  clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00250900


Author Affiliations: Departments of Pediatrics (Drs Spiro, Tay, Dziura, Baker, and Shapiro), Epidemiology and Public Health (Dr Shapiro), and Medicine (Dr Dziura), Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Conn; and Departments of Emergency Medicine and Pediatrics, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tenn (Dr Arnold). Dr Spiro is now with the Departments of Emergency Medicine and Pediatrics, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland.


RELATED LETTERS

Wait-and-See Prescription for Acute Otitis Media
James R. Johnson
JAMA. 2007;297(2):152.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Wait-and-See Prescription for Acute Otitis Media—Reply
Paul Little
JAMA. 2007;297(2):152.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Wait-and-See Prescription for Acute Otitis Media—Reply
David M. Spiro and Eugene D. Shapiro
JAMA. 2007;297(2):152-153.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

RELATED ARTICLE

Delayed Prescribing—A Sensible Approach to the Management of Acute Otitis Media
Paul Little
JAMA. 2006;296(10):1290-1291.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Comparison of Two Approaches to Observation Therapy for Acute Otitis Media in the Emergency Department
Chao et al.
Pediatrics 2008;121:e1352-e1356.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Age Inconsistency in the American Academy of Pediatrics Guidelines for Acute Otitis Media
Meropol et al.
Pediatrics 2008;121:657-668.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Management of Acute Otitis Media by Primary Care Physicians: Trends Since the Release of the 2004 American Academy of Pediatrics/American Academy of Family Physicians Clinical Practice Guideline
Vernacchio et al.
Pediatrics 2007;120:281-287.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Wait-and-See Prescription for Acute Otitis Media
Johnson
JAMA 2007;297:152-152.
FULL TEXT  

Wait-and-See Program Reduces Antibiotic Use for Acute Otitis Media
JWatch Emergency Med. 2006;2006:1-1.
FULL TEXT  

Otitis Media: Treat or Wait?
JWatch Pediatrics 2006;2006:1-1.
FULL TEXT  

What's new in the other general journals
Tonks
BMJ 2006;333:643-644.
FULL TEXT  

Acute Otitis Media: Is Watchful Waiting OK?
JWatch Infect. Diseases 2006;2006:2-2.
FULL TEXT  

Delayed prescribing--a sensible approach to the management of acute otitis media.
Little
JAMA 2006;296:1290-1291.
FULL TEXT  

Wait-and-See Antibiotics for Otitis Media in the ER
JWatch General 2006;2006:1-1.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2006 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.